Effect of Paracervical Block on Post Operative Pain in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of placing numbing medication around the cervix prior to performing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in decreasing pain after surgery. The study focuses on laparoscopic hysterectomies and robotic-assisted myomectomies. It will assess whether patients who receive the medication experience less pain and require less pain medication post operatively and if it helps reduce the number of patients who require hospitalization for pain control following surgery.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A variety of traditionally open surgical procedures have recently become minimally invasive through the use of laparoscopic technology. Gynecologic surgeries are no exception. However, some gynecologic laparoscopic procedures are associated with significant post-operative pain, necessitating prolonged hospitalization, use of post-operative opioids, and in some cases, the development of chronic post-operative pain. Prolonged hospitalization and use of opioids pose important patient safety concerns, such as increased risk of hospital borne illnesses and medication errors; in addition, opioids may cause respiratory depression and addiction. Given the rising cost of health care there is also an economic incentive to eliminate the need for hospital admission due to post-operative pain.
Preemptive analgesia involves nerve blockade or administration of pain medication systemically prior to incision to reduce post-procedure pain. Paracervical blockade is a form of preemptive analgesia. Paracervical blocks have been demonstrated to be safe and effective for obstetrical procedures in reducing post-operative pain since the 1970s. Recently they have also been shown to be efficacious for reducing post-operative pain in vaginal hysterectomy (Long et al, Int Urogynecol J (2009) 20:5-10).
For the present investigation, we intend to study the effectiveness of paracervical blockade for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery. We hypothesize that paracervical blockade prior to surgical incision will lessen levels of post-operative pain, reduce use of opioids, and decrease the number of patients requiring hospitalization for pain control. We also hypothesize that the effects may be longer lasting than the immediate post-operative period and may decrease the amount of time to return to normal activity after surgery.
Using anecdotal evidence from the primary investigator, Dr. Ascher-Walsh the rate of hospitalization for laparoscopic hysterectomy (laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy) is approximately 67%. In this study, we wish to decrease hospitalization with the paracervical block by 50%, thus obtaining an overall post-operative hospitalization rate of 33%. For robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, the rate of hospitalization is 50%. We wish to decrease this by 50% as well. Overall we are aiming to achieve a rate of 30% for post-operative hospitalization for pain control for laparoscopic hysterectomies and robotic myomectomies combined.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Bupivacaine Subjects receive paracervical block with bupivacaine-epinephrine |
Drug: Bupivacaine
Subjects are injected paracervically with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Saline Subjects receive paracervical injection of normal saline |
Drug: Normal Saline
Subjects are injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Hospital Admission for Postoperative Pain Control [Four hours after conclusion of surgery]
Unplanned hospital admissions and the hospital admissions at the request of the patients for pain management
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Postoperative Pain Score [1and 2 hour postoperatively]
Postoperative pain levels assessed using the visual analogue pain scale. This scale pairs faces with numbers 1-10, with 1 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain. In the PACU pain assessed using this scale by the nursing staff.
- Postoperative Pain Score [1, 2, 4 hour postoperatively, Day 1 post operatively, Day 2 postoperative]
Postoperative pain levels assessed using the visual analogue pain scale. This scale pairs faces with numbers 1-10, with 1 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain. In the PACU pain assessed using this scale by the nursing staff. On postoperative days 1 and 2 the subjects self-reported their pain level.
- Postoperative Day Pain Medication Use [Postoperative days 0-10]
Numbers of Patients Using Pain Medication on Postoperative Days 1-10. The subjects recorded at home the type and amount of pain medication they use for 10 days postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Female
-
Age 18 or older
-
Scheduled for robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy, including total and supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
-
Surgery being performed for benign disease
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Male
-
Women under 18 years old
-
Pregnancy
-
Suspected or known malignant disease
-
Immunocompromised
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | United States | 10029 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charles Ascher-Walsh, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- GCO 11-0021
- HS# 11-00013
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign indications were enrolled between 2011 and 2013 |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Saline |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision. | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 68 | 64 |
COMPLETED | 68 | 64 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Saline | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision. | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 68 | 64 | 132 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
48.4
(9.2)
|
47.8
(9.3)
|
48.1
(9.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
68
100%
|
64
100%
|
132
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
White |
36
52.9%
|
28
43.8%
|
64
48.5%
|
Black |
12
17.6%
|
20
31.3%
|
32
24.2%
|
Hispanic |
13
19.1%
|
10
15.6%
|
23
17.4%
|
Asian |
4
5.9%
|
3
4.7%
|
7
5.3%
|
Other |
2
2.9%
|
2
3.1%
|
4
3%
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
27.2
(5.7)
|
29.1
(6.9)
|
28.1
(6.4)
|
Parity (Count of Participants) | |||
0 |
21
30.9%
|
38
59.4%
|
59
44.7%
|
1 |
10
14.7%
|
10
15.6%
|
20
15.2%
|
2 |
22
32.4%
|
19
29.7%
|
41
31.1%
|
≥3 |
15
22.1%
|
11
17.2%
|
26
19.7%
|
Surgical Indication (Count of Participants) | |||
Fibroids |
7
10.3%
|
9
14.1%
|
16
12.1%
|
Bleeding |
2
2.9%
|
1
1.6%
|
3
2.3%
|
Prolapse |
14
20.6%
|
8
12.5%
|
22
16.7%
|
Pain |
4
5.9%
|
1
1.6%
|
5
3.8%
|
Other |
0
0%
|
3
4.7%
|
3
2.3%
|
Fibroids & bleeding |
19
27.9%
|
14
21.9%
|
33
25%
|
Fibroids, bleeding & pain |
18
26.5%
|
23
35.9%
|
41
31.1%
|
Bleeding & pain |
4
5.9%
|
5
7.8%
|
9
6.8%
|
Uterine Size (weeks) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [weeks] |
13.7
(5.5)
|
14.2
(4.6)
|
14.0
(5.1)
|
Preoperative Hematocrit (% of cells) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [% of cells] |
36.8
(4.0)
|
36.6
(4.2)
|
36.7
(4.1)
|
Admission Planned (admissions) [Number] | |||
Number [admissions] |
5
|
1
|
6
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Hospital Admission for Postoperative Pain Control |
---|---|
Description | Unplanned hospital admissions and the hospital admissions at the request of the patients for pain management |
Time Frame | Four hours after conclusion of surgery |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Saline |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision. | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision. |
Measure Participants | 68 | 64 |
Unplanned admission |
23
33.8%
|
17
26.6%
|
Unplanned admission for pain |
10
14.7%
|
11
17.2%
|
Title | Postoperative Pain Score |
---|---|
Description | Postoperative pain levels assessed using the visual analogue pain scale. This scale pairs faces with numbers 1-10, with 1 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain. In the PACU pain assessed using this scale by the nursing staff. |
Time Frame | 1and 2 hour postoperatively |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This doesn't include hospitalization for reasons other than pain management. |
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Bupivacaine Discharged | Saline Group | Saline Discharged Participants |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision and admitted for pain management. Participants who requested admission specifically for pain management. | Subjects who received bupivacaine and epinephrine and discharged home after surgery. Participants in the Bupivacaine arm who were not admitted. | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision who were admitted for pain management. participants in the Saline arm who requested admission specifically for pain management. | Subjects who received saline and discharged after surgery. Participants in the Saline arm who were discharged after procedure and not admitted. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 40 | 11 | 46 |
1 hour postoperative |
4.7
(2.9)
|
3.9
(2.2)
|
5.1
(2.0)
|
4.5
(2.4)
|
2 hours postoperative |
4.3
(2.5)
|
2.7
(1.8)
|
4.5
(2.4)
|
3.8
(2.3)
|
Title | Postoperative Pain Score |
---|---|
Description | Postoperative pain levels assessed using the visual analogue pain scale. This scale pairs faces with numbers 1-10, with 1 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain. In the PACU pain assessed using this scale by the nursing staff. On postoperative days 1 and 2 the subjects self-reported their pain level. |
Time Frame | 1, 2, 4 hour postoperatively, Day 1 post operatively, Day 2 postoperative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only those subjects with pain analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Saline Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision and admitted for pain management | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision who were admitted for pain management |
Measure Participants | 64 | 59 |
1 hour postoperative |
4.30
(2.55)
|
4.69
(2.29)
|
2 hours postoperative |
3.37
(2.19)
|
4.01
(2.32)
|
4 hours postoperative |
3.83
(2.57)
|
4.35
(2.43)
|
Day 1 postoperative |
3.80
(2.53)
|
4.35
(2.14)
|
Day 2 postoperative |
3.16
(2.34)
|
3.37
(2.39)
|
Title | Postoperative Day Pain Medication Use |
---|---|
Description | Numbers of Patients Using Pain Medication on Postoperative Days 1-10. The subjects recorded at home the type and amount of pain medication they use for 10 days postoperatively. |
Time Frame | Postoperative days 0-10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
missing data from 5 participants in Bupivacaine Arm and 4 in Saline Arm |
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine Narcotics Use | Saline Narcotics Use | Bupivacaine OTC Analgesics Use | Saline OTC Analgesics Use |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | OTC - over-the-counter | |||
Measure Participants | 63 | 60 | 63 | 60 |
Postoperative Day 1 |
52
76.5%
|
52
81.3%
|
17
12.9%
|
10
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 2 |
43
63.2%
|
39
60.9%
|
24
18.2%
|
18
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 3 |
28
41.2%
|
33
51.6%
|
29
22%
|
22
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 4 |
19
27.9%
|
26
40.6%
|
28
21.2%
|
26
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 5 |
13
19.1%
|
15
23.4%
|
19
14.4%
|
28
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 6 |
12
17.6%
|
13
20.3%
|
15
11.4%
|
24
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 7 |
5
7.4%
|
11
17.2%
|
16
12.1%
|
16
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 8 |
3
4.4%
|
10
15.6%
|
12
9.1%
|
12
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 9 |
2
2.9%
|
6
9.4%
|
9
6.8%
|
11
NaN
|
Postoperative Day 10 |
3
4.4%
|
7
10.9%
|
9
6.8%
|
10
NaN
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Complications were noted up to 6 weeks after surgery using the Clavien-Dindo Classification system. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Grade I Any deviation from normal postoperative course without need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, & radiological interventions II Require pharmacological treatment with drug other than such allowed for Grade I complications III Require surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention IIIa Intervention not under general anaesthesia IIIb Intervention under general anaesthesia IV Life-threatening complication IVa Single organ IVb Multiorgan V Death | |||
Arm/Group Title | Bupivacaine | Saline | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received a 20mL paracervical injection of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 units epinephrine prior to surgical incision. | Subjects injected paracervically with 10 ml of normal saline prior to surgical incision. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Bupivacaine | Saline | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/68 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Bupivacaine | Saline | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Stress Incontinence | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Bupivacaine | Saline | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 17/68 (25%) | 16/64 (25%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Seizure | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Emergency Room Visit | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Incisional Infection | 4/68 (5.9%) | 4/64 (6.3%) | ||
Small Bowel Mesenteric Hematoma | 0/68 (0%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | ||
Skin laceration | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Retropubic hematoma | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1/64 (1.6%) | ||
Bladder performation | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/64 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Urinary Tract Infection | 0/68 (0%) | 3/64 (4.7%) | ||
Urinary Retention | 6/68 (8.8%) | 6/64 (9.4%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Cervical infection | 2/68 (2.9%) | 1/64 (1.6%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Rachel L. Barr Grzesh |
---|---|
Organization | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai |
Phone | 212-241-2995 |
rachel.barr@mssm.edu |
- GCO 11-0021
- HS# 11-00013