Study of the Efficacy of Plain Soap and Water Versus Alcohol-based Rubs for Surgical Hand Preparation

Sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00987402
Collaborator
World Health Organization (Other), AIC Kijabe Hospital (Other)
3,317
1
2
10
332.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute a significant health-economic and clinical challenge. The investigators conducted a cluster-randomized, cross-over study to compare the efficacy of plain soap and water (PSW), used ubiquitously across sub-Saharan Africa for surgical hand preparation, to alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR), with SSI rates as the main outcome measure.

A total of 3317 patients undergoing clean and clean-contaminated surgery were included in the study and followed up for 30 days.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Plain soap and water (PSW)
  • Other: Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR)
Phase 1/Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
3317 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Surgical Site Infections: a Cluster-randomized, Cross-over Study of the Efficacy of Plain Soap and Water Versus Alcohol-based Rubs for Surgical Hand Preparation
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2007

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Plain soap and water

Surgical hand preparation with plain soap and water

Other: Plain soap and water (PSW)
Presence or absence of infection
Other Names:
  • Plain bar soap
  • WHO recommended alcohol based hand rub formulation II
  • Active Comparator: Alcohol based hand rubs

    Surgical hand preparation with alcohol based alcohol hand rub

    Other: Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR)
    Presence or absence of infection

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Surgical Site Infection [30 days post-operatively]

      255 (8.1%) patients developed SSIs. Rates for the two study arms were similar (8.3% for alcohol-based handrub versus 8.0% for plain soap and water; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80 - 1.33).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Cost of Hand Preparation Agent [30 days]

      Average weekly costs were estimated for the plain soap and water used each week in the operating room as well as for the procurement, preparation and dispensing of the alcohol-based handrub to enable a comparison between the two study arms.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All patients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated surgery at AIC Kijabe Hospital
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • All patients undergoing contaminated, dirty surgeries and those undergoing repeat procedures within 2 weeks after the initial surgical intervention.

    • Patients who did not consent to participate in the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Africa Inland Church Kijabe Hospital Kijabe Central Kenya 00220

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital, Geneva
    • World Health Organization
    • AIC Kijabe Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Peter M Nthumba, MD, AIC Kijabe Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00987402
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • KH-PSW-ABHR
    First Posted:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2009

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Patients undergoing surgery at AIC Kijabe Hospital recruited between January 2007 to November 2007
    Pre-assignment Detail Patients who declined consent for participation were excluded, as were those undergoing a second procedure within 2 weeks of the first.
    Arm/Group Title Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Arm/Group Description Surgical hand preparation with plain soap and water Surgical hand preparation with alcohol based alcohol hand rub
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 1682 1635
    COMPLETED 1596 1537
    NOT COMPLETED 86 98

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs Total
    Arm/Group Description Surgical hand preparation with plain soap and water Surgical hand preparation with alcohol based alcohol hand rub Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 1682 1635 3317
    Age (Mean) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Participants]
    28
    (23) 1.7%
    29
    (19) 1.8%
    29
    (22) 0.9%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    964
    57.3%
    908
    55.5%
    1872
    56.4%
    Male
    718
    42.7%
    727
    44.5%
    1445
    43.6%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Kenya
    1682
    100%
    1635
    100%
    3317
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cost of Hand Preparation Agent
    Description Average weekly costs were estimated for the plain soap and water used each week in the operating room as well as for the procurement, preparation and dispensing of the alcohol-based handrub to enable a comparison between the two study arms.
    Time Frame 30 days

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Surgical Site Infection
    Description 255 (8.1%) patients developed SSIs. Rates for the two study arms were similar (8.3% for alcohol-based handrub versus 8.0% for plain soap and water; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80 - 1.33).
    Time Frame 30 days post-operatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Arm/Group Description Surgical hand preparation with plain soap and water Surgical hand preparation with alcohol based alcohol hand rub
    Measure Participants 1682 1635
    Number [Participants]
    128
    7.6%
    127
    7.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Plain Soap and Water, Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Comments Power calculations assumed a 2-sided alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 80%. We performed power calculations using a statistical model for a cluster-randomized trial with 8, 10 or 12 clusters including 6 operating rooms each, with different levels of reduction (10%, 30%, 50%) in surgical site infection rates in the active intervention period. By reaching a sample size of 3133 patients, the study was powered to detect a 30% reduction effect in SSI rates, from 10% to 7%.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.05
    Comments
    Method generalized estimating equation
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Arm/Group Description Surgical hand preparation with plain soap and water Surgical hand preparation with alcohol based alcohol hand rub
    All Cause Mortality
    Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/1596 (0%) 0/1537 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Plain Soap and Water Alcohol Based Hand Rubs
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/1596 (0%) 0/1537 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Most cases, post-discharge monitoring was not conducted by outpatient clinic visits following a standard protocol, some data was not collected, and routine microbiologic cultures were not obtained.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Stephan Harbarth MD
    Organization University Hospital, Geneva
    Phone +41-22-372.3357
    Email stephan.harbarth@hcuge.ch
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00987402
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • KH-PSW-ABHR
    First Posted:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2009