A Study to Evaluate SAGE-217 in Participants With Severe Postpartum Depression

Sponsor
Sage Therapeutics (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02978326
Collaborator
(none)
276
27
3
23.2
10.2
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study was to determine if treatment with SAGE-217 reduces depressive symptoms in participants with severe postpartum depression (PPD) compared to placebo as assessed by the change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score at Day 15 and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SAGE-217 compared to placebo as assessed by the incidence of adverse events, vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution
  • Drug: Placebo
  • Drug: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
276 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of SAGE-217 in the Treatment of Adult Female Subjects With Severe Postpartum Depression
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 4, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 15, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 11, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution

Participants received SAGE-217, 15 milligrams (mg), oral solution, twice daily (BID) for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated.

Drug: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution
SAGE-217, 15 mg oral solution, BID for Days 1 to 2 followed by 20 mg oral solution BID for Days 3 to 14. If not tolerated, 15 mg for the rest of study (Days 3 to 14).

Placebo Comparator: Part B: Placebo

Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.

Drug: Placebo
SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.

Experimental: Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules

Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.

Drug: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in the 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15 [Parts A and B: Baseline, Day 15]

    The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Items scored in a range of 0 to 2 include: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following items are scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Days 3, 8, 21 and 45 [Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 21 and 45]

    The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Items scored in a range of 0 to 2 include: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following items are scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.

  2. Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response [Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    HAM-D Response was defined as having a 50 percent (%) or greater reduction from Baseline in HAM-D total score. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. The items on HAM-D included: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early night, middle night, early hours [morning]), work and activities, retardation (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Higher scores indicated more depression.

  3. Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission [Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    HAM-D Remission was defined as a HAM-D total score of less than or equal to (<=)7. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. The items on HAM-D included: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early night, middle night, early hours [morning]), work and activities, retardation (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Higher scores indicated more depression.

  4. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Subscales Scores [Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. HAM-D subscales: Core subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, and retardation ); Anxiety subscale (symptoms-anxiety [psychic and somatic], somatic symptoms [gastrointestinal and general], hypochondriasis, loss of weight); Bech-6 subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, anxiety psychic, and somatic symptoms general); Meier subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, agitation, and anxiety psychic). Each item was scored in a range of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, higher scores=greater degree of depression. Subscale scores were calculated as the sum of the individual item scores comprising each subscale. Scores were transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.

  5. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Scores [Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Individual items on the scale were scored in a range of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. Symptoms scored in a range of 0 to 2: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following symptoms were scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. Higher scores indicated a greater degree of depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.

  6. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.

  7. Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Response [Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) item of the CGI scale uses a 7-point Likert scale to measure the overall improvement in the participant's condition posttreatment. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. Response choices included: 0=not assessed, 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. CGI response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). The percentage of participants with overall improvement in post-treatment condition, rated by investigator as very much improved (CGI-I score of 1) or much improved (CGI-I score of 2) is reported.

  8. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score [Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    The 14-item HAM-A was used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. Each of the 14 items was defined by a series of symptoms and measured both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). The individual items were scored in a range of 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The HAM-A total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 56 where a score of <17=mild severity; 18-24= mild to moderate severity and 25-30=moderate to severe severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates less anxiety.

  9. Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response [Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    MADRS response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from Baseline in MADRS total score. The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more depression.

  10. Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission [Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45]

    MADRS Remission was defined as a MADRS total score of <=10. The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more depression.

  11. Parts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Part A: Up to Day 75; Part B: Up to Day 45]

    An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

  12. Part B: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Measurements [Part B: From first dose of study drug up to 45 days]

    Vital signs included assessments of supine and standing systolic blood pressure (SBP), supine and standing diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate.

  13. Part B: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Evaluations [Part B: From first dose of study drug up to 45 days]

    Laboratory tests included tests of Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis.

  14. Part B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter Heart Rate [Part B: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21]

    ECG parameters included assessment of the standard 12-lead ECG intervals: QT, QTcF, PR, RR, QRS, and heart rate. Heart rate was measured in terms of beats per minute. Change from Baseline in heart rate at specified time points were reported.

  15. Part B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters-PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval [Part B: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21]

    ECG parameters included assessment of the standard 12-lead ECG intervals: QT, QTcF, PR, RR, QRS, and heart rate. Change from Baseline in PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval is reported.

  16. Part B: Number of Participants With a Response of "Yes" to Any Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behaviors Item Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [Part B: Up to Day 45]

    C-SSRS was used to assess the suicidality of participants during the study. The assessment included "yes" or "no" responses for 5 questions, each related to suicidal ideation (wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods, active suicidal ideation with some intent, active suicidal ideation with specific plan) and suicidal behavior (preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, suicide). Numeric ratings were provided for severity of ideation (if present), from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most severe. Number of participants with a response of 'yes' to any suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior item as measured by C-SSRS is reported.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Key Inclusion Criteria:
  • Participant either must have ceased lactating at screening or, if still lactating or actively breastfeeding at screening, must agree to temporarily cease giving breast milk to her infant(s)

  • Participant has had a Major Depressive Episode that began no earlier than the third trimester and no later than the first 4 weeks following delivery, as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Axis I Disorders (SCID-I)

  • Participant was <=six months postpartum.

Key Exclusion Criteria:
  • Active psychosis

  • Attempted suicide associated with current episode of postpartum depression

  • Medical history of seizures

  • Medical history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and/or schizoaffective disorder.

Note: suicidal ideation was not an exclusion. Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria might apply.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sage Investigational Site Little Rock Arkansas United States 72209
2 Sage Investigational Site Beverly Hills California United States 90212
3 Sage Investigational Site Oceanside California United States 92056
4 Sage Investigational Site Wildomar California United States 92595
5 Sage Investigational Site Washington District of Columbia United States 20011
6 Sage Investigational Site Aventura Florida United States 33027
7 Sage Investigational Site Miami Florida United States 33173
8 Sage Investigational Site Orlando Florida United States 32807
9 Sage Investigational Site Pensacola Florida United States 32502
10 Sage Investigational SIte Pinellas Park Florida United States 33782
11 Sage Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia United States 30331
12 Sage Investigational Site Decatur Georgia United States 30030
13 Sage Investigational Site Hoffman Estates Illinois United States 60169
14 Sage Investigational Site Owensboro Kentucky United States 42303
15 Sage Investigational Site Lake Charles Louisiana United States 70629
16 Sage Investigational Site New Orleans Louisiana United States 70115
17 Sage Investigational Site Saint Charles Missouri United States 63304
18 Sage Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89102
19 Sage Investigational Site Manhasset New York United States 11030
20 Sage Investigational Site New York New York United States 10036
21 Sage Investigational Site Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599
22 Sage Investigational Site Raleigh North Carolina United States 27612
23 Sage Investigational Site Providence Rhode Island United States 02904
24 Sage Investigational Site Fort Worth Texas United States 76060
25 Sage Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77058
26 Sage Investigational Site Richardson Texas United States 75080
27 Sage Investigational Site Orem Utah United States 84058

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sage Therapeutics

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sage Therapeutics
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02978326
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 217-PPD-201
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 10, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sage Therapeutics
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Participants took part in the study at 27 investigative centers in the United States of America from 04 January 2017 to 11 December 2018. Study was conducted in 2 parts. In Part A, only 1 participant was enrolled and thus no analysis was performed for Part A. All analysis sets were defined only for Part B. For Part A, only adverse events incidence were captured.
Pre-assignment Detail A total of 276 participants were enrolled and consented of which 154 eligible participants were randomized and thus presented in participant flow. Rest of the 123 participants were not randomized and not part of any analyses. 152 randomized participants received study drug and 143 completed the study.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 milligrams (mg), oral solution, twice daily (BID) for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Period Title: Part A (Up to 75 Days)
STARTED 1 0 0
COMPLETED 1 0 0
NOT COMPLETED 0 0 0
Period Title: Part A (Up to 75 Days)
STARTED 0 76 77
Received Study Drug 0 73 78
Safety Set (Part B) 0 73 78
Efficacy Set (Part B) 0 74 76
COMPLETED 0 69 73
NOT COMPLETED 0 7 4

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 1 74 76 151
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
1
100%
74
100%
76
100%
151
100%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
1
100%
74
100%
76
100%
151
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
18
1800%
16
21.6%
34
44.7%
Not Hispanic or Latino
56
5600%
60
81.1%
116
152.6%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
1
100%
1
1.4%
2
2.6%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1
100%
0
0%
1
1.3%
Black or African American
31
3100%
31
41.9%
62
81.6%
White
40
4000%
44
59.5%
84
110.5%
More than one race
1
100%
0
0%
1
1.3%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score (score on a scale) [Mean (Full Range) ]
Mean (Full Range) [score on a scale]
28.8
28.4
28.6
HAM-D Subscales Scores (score on a scale) [Mean (Full Range) ]
Core
50.1
51.3
50.7
Anxiety
56.3
53.1
54.7
Bech-6
64.5
66.3
65.4
Meier
57.1
59.1
58.1
HAM-D Individual Item Scores (score on a scale) [Mean (Full Range) ]
Depressed Mood
3.1
3.1
3.1
Feelings of Guilt
2.2
2.5
2.35
Suicide
0.4
0.4
0.4
Insomnia Early - Early Night
1.8
1.8
1.8
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night
1.9
1.7
1.8
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning
1.5
1.6
1.55
Work and Activities
3.1
3.0
3.05
Retardation
1.2
1.2
1.2
Agitation
1.4
1.4
1.4
Anxiety Psychic
2.7
2.9
2.8
Anxiety Somatic
1.9
1.9
1.9
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal
1.5
1.3
1.4
General Somatic Symptoms
1.8
1.8
1.8
Genital Symptoms
1.9
1.9
1.9
Hypochondriasis
1.3
1.0
1.15
Loss of Weight According to Patient
0.9
0.6
0.75
Insight
0.1
0.1
0.1
Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (score on a scale) [Mean (Full Range) ]
Mean (Full Range) [score on a scale]
36.3
34.9
35.6
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (score on a scale) [Mean (Full Range) ]
Mean (Full Range) [score on a scale]
27.2
26.1
26.65

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in the 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15
Description The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Items scored in a range of 0 to 2 include: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following items are scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.
Time Frame Parts A and B: Baseline, Day 15

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on a scale]
-13.6
(1.07)
-17.8
(1.04)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0028
Comments Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.9 to -1.5
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.37
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Days 3, 8, 21 and 45
Description The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Items scored in a range of 0 to 2 include: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following items are scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Change From Baseline at Day 3
-9.8
(0.95)
-12.5
(0.93)
Change From Baseline at Day 8
-12.9
(1.03)
-16.3
(1.00)
Change From Baseline at Day 21
-14.4
(1.11)
-17.6
(1.09)
Change From Baseline at Day 45
-15.1
(1.06)
-19.2
(1.02)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0252
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -2.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-5.1 to -0.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.19
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0106
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.0 to -0.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.31
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0321
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.0 to -0.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.44
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0027
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.7 to -1.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.34
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response
Description HAM-D Response was defined as having a 50 percent (%) or greater reduction from Baseline in HAM-D total score. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. The items on HAM-D included: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early night, middle night, early hours [morning]), work and activities, retardation (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Higher scores indicated more depression.
Time Frame Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Day 3
27.0
2700%
40.5
54.7%
Day 8
44.6
4460%
65.3
88.2%
Day 15
47.9
4790%
71.6
96.8%
Day 21
56.2
5620%
71.6
96.8%
Day 45
56.5
5650%
75.3
101.8%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1004
Comments Generalized estimating equations (GEE) for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.79
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.89 to 3.60
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0127
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.31
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.20 to 4.45
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0049
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.63
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.34 to 5.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0763
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.85
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.94 to 3.64
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Response at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0216
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.13 to 4.60
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission
Description HAM-D Remission was defined as a HAM-D total score of less than or equal to (<=)7. The HAM-D total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 52. The items on HAM-D included: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early night, middle night, early hours [morning]), work and activities, retardation (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Higher scores indicated more depression.
Time Frame Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Day 3
5.4
540%
18.9
25.5%
Day 8
18.9
1890%
32.0
43.2%
Day 15
23.3
2330%
44.6
60.3%
Day 21
28.8
2880%
41.9
56.6%
Day 45
30.4
3040%
53.4
72.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0200
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.89
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.24 to 12.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0990
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.91
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.89 to 4.13
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0110
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.53
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.24 to 5.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1982
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.79 to 3.19
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With HAM-D Remission at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0091
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline HAM-D total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.52
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.26 to 5.03
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Subscales Scores
Description HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. HAM-D subscales: Core subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, and retardation ); Anxiety subscale (symptoms-anxiety [psychic and somatic], somatic symptoms [gastrointestinal and general], hypochondriasis, loss of weight); Bech-6 subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, anxiety psychic, and somatic symptoms general); Meier subscale (symptoms-depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, agitation, and anxiety psychic). Each item was scored in a range of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, higher scores=greater degree of depression. Subscale scores were calculated as the sum of the individual item scores comprising each subscale. Scores were transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Core: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-16.7
(1.91)
-18.8
(1.88)
Core: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-23.4
(2.03)
-28.7
(1.99)
Core: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-26.8
(2.10)
-31.9
(2.06)
Core: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-27.3
(2.24)
-33.7
(2.20)
Core: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-29.5
(2.11)
-37.2
(2.05)
Anxiety: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-16.4
(1.98)
-23.5
(1.93)
Anxiety: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-23.2
(2.15)
-29.8
(2.09)
Anxiety: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-23.4
(2.19)
-33.2
(2.13)
Anxiety: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-27.3
(2.17)
-33.3
(2.11)
Anxiety: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-26.5
(2.19)
-34.5
(2.11)
Bech-6: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-19.5
(2.45)
-23.7
(2.41)
Bech-6: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-28.3
(2.58)
-34.9
(2.53)
Bech-6: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-30.9
(2.61)
-39.2
(2.56)
Bech-6: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-32.7
(2.72)
-40.7
(2.68)
Bech-6: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-34.6
(2.61)
-44.0
(2.54)
Meier: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-17.0
(2.17)
-21.7
(2.13)
Meier: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-25.0
(2.30)
-32.2
(2.24)
Meier: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-28.1
(2.35)
-35.5
(2.30)
Meier: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-29.9
(2.42)
-37.0
(2.37)
Meier: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-31.5
(2.32)
-41.0
(2.25)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Core: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3832
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -2.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.9 to 2.7
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Core: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0415
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -5.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-10.5 to -0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.60
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Core: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0606
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -5.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-10.5 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.71
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Core: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0318
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-12.1 to -0.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.91
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Core: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0047
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -7.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.0 to -2.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.69
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0053
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -7.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-12.0 to -2.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0181
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-12.1 to -1.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.76
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0007
Comments
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -9.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-15.3 to -4.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.82
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0332
Comments
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-11.5 to -0.5
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.79
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0048
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -8.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.5 to -2.5
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.80
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Bech-6: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1840
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-10.3 to 2.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Bech-6: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0462
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -6.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.2 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.31
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Bech-6: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0150
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -8.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-14.9 to -1.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.36
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Bech-6: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0245
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -8.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-15.0 to -1.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Bech-6: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0054
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -9.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-16.0 to -2.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.34
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Meier: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0972
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-10.1 to 0.9
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.77
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Meier: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0155
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -7.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.1 to -1.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.95
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Meier: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0149
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -7.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.4 to -1.5
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.03
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Meier: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0250
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -7.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.3 to -0.9
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 3.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo
Comments Meier: Change from Baseline in HAM-D Subscale Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0017
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D subscale score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -9.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-15.3 to -3.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 2.96
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Scores
Description The 17-item HAM-D is used to rate the severity of depression in participants who are already diagnosed as depressed. Individual items on the scale were scored in a range of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. Symptoms scored in a range of 0 to 2: insomnia (early, middle, late), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, loss of weight, and insight. The following symptoms were scored in a range of 0 to 4: agitation, depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, retardation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), and hypochondriasis. Higher scores indicated a greater degree of depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.8
(0.13)
-1.1
(0.13)
Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-1.3
(0.14)
-1.7
(0.13)
Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.5
(0.15)
-1.8
(0.13)
Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-1.5
(0.14)
-2.1
(0.13)
Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-1.7
(0.15)
-2.1
(0.12)
Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.9
(0.12)
-1.0
(0.13)
Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-1.1
(0.13)
-1.4
(0.12)
Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.3
(0.13)
-1.5
(0.11)
Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-1.2
(0.13)
-1.6
(0.12)
Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-1.5
(0.12)
-1.8
(0.11)
Suicide: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.2
(0.05)
-0.3
(0.04)
Suicide: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.2
(0.04)
-0.4
(0.03)
Suicide: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.3
(0.04)
-0.3
(0.04)
Suicide: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.2
(0.05)
-0.3
(0.05)
Suicide: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.2
(0.05)
-0.4
(0.03)
Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.2
(0.10)
Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.10)
Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.10)
Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.1
(0.10)
Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-1.0
(0.12)
-1.1
(0.11)
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-1.0
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.10)
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-1.0
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.09)
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.09)
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.8
(0.11)
-1.2
(0.09)
Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.3
(0.10)
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.8
(0.11)
-1.1
(0.10)
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.9
(0.10)
-1.2
(0.09)
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.0
(0.11)
-1.2
(0.09)
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.0
(0.10)
Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.9
(0.10)
-1.3
(0.08)
Work and Activities: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.8
(0.12)
-0.9
(0.13)
Work and Activities: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-1.3
(0.14)
-1.4
(0.14)
Work and Activities: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.4
(0.14)
-1.8
(0.13)
Work and Activities: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-1.7
(0.16)
-1.9
(0.14)
Work and Activities: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-1.7
(0.16)
-2.1
(0.14)
Retardation: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.5
(0.07)
-0.4
(0.10)
Retardation: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.7
(0.08)
-0.8
(0.07)
Retardation: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.8
(0.07)
-0.8
(0.07)
Retardation: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.8
(0.08)
-0.8
(0.07)
Retardation: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.9
(0.07)
-1.0
(0.07)
Agitation: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.4
(0.09)
-0.7
(0.09)
Agitation: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.6
(0.09)
-0.9
(0.08)
Agitation: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.6
(0.09)
-0.9
(0.09)
Agitation: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.8
(0.09)
-0.9
(0.08)
Agitation: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.8
(0.09)
-1.1
(0.07)
Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.7
(0.12)
-1.1
(0.13)
Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-1.1
(0.14)
-1.5
(0.13)
Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.2
(0.13)
-1.6
(0.13)
Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-1.3
(0.14)
-1.6
(0.12)
Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-1.3
(0.14)
-1.7
(0.12)
Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.6
(0.10)
-0.7
(0.10)
Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.7
(0.10)
-0.9
(0.10)
Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.8
(0.11)
-0.9
(0.10)
Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.9
(0.11)
-1.0
(0.11)
Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.8
(0.11)
-1.0
(0.10)
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.3
(0.09)
-0.6
(0.10)
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.6
(0.10)
-0.8
(0.09)
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.7
(0.11)
-1.0
(0.08)
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.8
(0.11)
-0.9
(0.09)
Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.8
(0.10)
-1.0
(0.09)
General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.6
(0.08)
-0.7
(0.09)
General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.8
(0.09)
-0.9
(0.09)
General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.6
(0.08)
-1.1
(0.09)
General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.7
(0.10)
-1.0
(0.08)
General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.8
(0.09)
-1.0
(0.09)
Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.3
(0.08)
-0.4
(0.09)
Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.6
(0.10)
-0.6
(0.09)
Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.7
(0.10)
-0.9
(0.10)
Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.7
(0.10)
-0.8
(0.10)
Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.8
(0.10)
-1.0
(0.10)
Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.5
(0.09)
-0.7
(0.08)
Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.6
(0.08)
-0.8
(0.07)
Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.5
(0.10)
-1.0
(0.06)
Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.6
(0.08)
-0.9
(0.06)
Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.7
(0.09)
-0.9
(0.07)
Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline at Day 3
-0.3
(0.08)
-0.5
(0.07)
Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-0.4
(0.07)
-0.5
(0.07)
Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.5
(0.07)
-0.5
(0.06)
Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-0.6
(0.06)
-0.6
(0.05)
Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline at Day 45
-0.5
(0.08)
-0.6
(0.05)
Insight: Change From Baseline at Day 3
0.0
(0.02)
-0.1
(0.02)
Insight: Change From Baseline at Day 8
0.0
(0.02)
-0.1
(0.02)
Insight: Change From Baseline at Day 15
0.0
(0.02)
-0.1
(0.02)
Insight: Change From Baseline at Day 21
0.0
(0.02)
-0.1
(0.02)
Insight: Change From Baseline at Day 45
0.0
(0.04)
-0.1
(0.02)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1569
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0376
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1035
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0037
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.9 to -0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Depressed Mood: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0061
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.8 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7878
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0498
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1719
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0161
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Feelings of Guilt: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0191
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Suicide: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2537
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.06
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Suicide: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0018
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.04
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Suicide: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2878
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.05
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Suicide: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2594
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.07
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Suicide: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0086
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.06
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0424
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0207
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0010
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0871
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early - Early Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5680
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 21
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0143
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 22
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0063
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 23
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0042
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 24
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0137
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 25
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Middle - Middle Night: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0099
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 26
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0507
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 27
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0205
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 28
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1409
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 29
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2021
Comments
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 30
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insomnia Early Hours - Morning: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0117
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 31
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Work and Activities: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5511
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 32
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Work and Activities: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4949
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 33
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Work and Activities: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0203
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.17
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 34
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Work and Activities: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2076
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.19
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 35
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Work and Activities: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0362
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.8 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.19
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 36
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Retardation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3589
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 37
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Retardation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6991
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 38
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Retardation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9655
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 39
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Retardation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8699
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 40
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Retardation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3715
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 41
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Agitation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0670
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 42
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Agitation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0104
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 43
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Agitation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0122
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 44
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Agitation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3157
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 45
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Agitation: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0077
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 46
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0078
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.8 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 47
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0372
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.18
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 48
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0244
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.17
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 49
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0993
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.17
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 50
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Psychic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0185
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.17
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 51
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2471
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 52
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1076
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 53
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2782
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 54
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4646
Comments
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 55
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Anxiety Somatic: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1600
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 56
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0474
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 57
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0446
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 58
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0093
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 59
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2998
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 60
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Somatic Symptoms Gastrointestinal: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0545
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 61
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2177
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 62
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2300
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 63
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0001
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.7 to -0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 64
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0151
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 65
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments General Somatic Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0502
Comments
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 66
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3659
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 67
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6003
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 68
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0785
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 69
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3668
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 70
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Genital Symptoms: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1827
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.13
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 71
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1327
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 72
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0993
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.4 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 73
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.6 to -0.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 74
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0056
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 75
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Hypochondriasis: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0122
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5 to -0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 76
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1305
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 77
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6638
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 78
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4341
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.08
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 79
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9085
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.07
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 80
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Loss of Weight According to Patient: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1820
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.3 to 0.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 81
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insight: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1593
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.03
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 82
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insight: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6555
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.03
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 83
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insight: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0170
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.03
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 84
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insight: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0188
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.1 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.03
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 85
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Insight: Change From Baseline in HAM-D Individual Item Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0726
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-D individual item score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.05
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Description The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from Baseline indicates less depression.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Change From Baseline at Day 3
-11.7
(1.36)
-14.8
(1.33)
Change From Baseline at Day 8
-16.3
(1.45)
-20.3
(1.42)
Change From Baseline at Day 15
-17.6
(1.48)
-22.1
(1.45)
Change From Baseline at Day 21
-17.8
(1.49)
-22.1
(1.46)
Change From Baseline at Day 45
-19.0
(1.44)
-24.8
(1.39)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0791
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment with treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.5 to 0.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.72
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0322
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment with treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 1.86%
-7.7 to -0.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.86
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0180
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment with treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-8.3 to -0.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.91
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in MADRS Total Score at 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0271
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment with treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-8.1 to -0.5
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.92
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in MADRS Total Score at 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0018
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment with treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -5.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-9.4 to -2.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.82
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Response
Description The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) item of the CGI scale uses a 7-point Likert scale to measure the overall improvement in the participant's condition posttreatment. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. Response choices included: 0=not assessed, 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. CGI response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). The percentage of participants with overall improvement in post-treatment condition, rated by investigator as very much improved (CGI-I score of 1) or much improved (CGI-I score of 2) is reported.
Time Frame Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Day 3
28.4
2840%
37.8
51.1%
Day 8
50.0
5000%
65.3
88.2%
Day 15
52.1
5210%
71.6
96.8%
Day 21
54.8
5480%
70.3
95%
Day 45
55.9
5590%
71.2
96.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3372
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline CGI-S score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.40
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.70 to 2.81
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0935
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline CGI-S score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.77
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.91 to 3.47
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0276
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline CGI-S score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.09 to 4.28
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0920
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment: Baseline CGI-S score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.79
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.91 to 3.54
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1109
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline CGI-S score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.76
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.88 to 3.51
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
Description The 14-item HAM-A was used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. Each of the 14 items was defined by a series of symptoms and measured both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). The individual items were scored in a range of 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The HAM-A total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 56 where a score of <17=mild severity; 18-24= mild to moderate severity and 25-30=moderate to severe severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates less anxiety.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Change From Baseline at Day 3
-8.9
(1.02)
-12.0
(0.99)
Change From Baseline at Day 8
-11.7
(1.04)
-16.1
(1.01)
Change From Baseline at Day 15
-12.7
(1.09)
-16.6
(1.07)
Change From Baseline at Day 21
-13.1
(1.07)
-16.6
(1.05)
Change From Baseline at Day 45
-13.6
(1.02)
-18.6
(0.99)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0169
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-A total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-5.7 to -0.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.29
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0010
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-A total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -4.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-7.0 to -1.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.32
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0063
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-A total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.7 to -1.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0119
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-A total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -3.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.2 to -0.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.37
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Change from Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
Comments MMRM was used for estimation with treatment, baseline HAM-A total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects.
Method Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -5.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-7.5 to -2.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.28
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response
Description MADRS response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from Baseline in MADRS total score. The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more depression.
Time Frame Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid Baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Day 3
27.0
2700%
40.5
54.7%
Day 8
50.0
5000%
64.0
86.5%
Day 15
47.9
4790%
73.0
98.6%
Day 21
52.1
5210%
70.3
95%
Day 45
56.5
5650%
74.0
100%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1145
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.87 to 3.53
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1069
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.71
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.89 to 3.30
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0045
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.36 to 5.27
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0421
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.03 to 3.93
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0541
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.99
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.99 to 4.03
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission
Description MADRS Remission was defined as a MADRS total score of <=10. The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored in a range of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores and could range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicated more depression.
Time Frame Part B: Days 3, 8, 15, 21 and 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated in the Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution arm group and due to low number of participants, no efficacy analyses were conducted for Part A of the study. Part B: Efficacy Set included all participants who were administered study drug, had a valid baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 0 74 76
Day 3
9.5
950%
24.3
32.8%
Day 8
28.4
2840%
37.3
50.4%
Day 15
30.1
3010%
54.1
73.1%
Day 21
31.5
3150%
52.7
71.2%
Day 45
37.7
3770%
58.9
79.6%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 3
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0326
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.84
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.09 to 7.38
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 8
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3749
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.38
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.68 to 2.79
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 15
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0087
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.49
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.26 to 4.92
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 21
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0257
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.10 to 4.31
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Part B: Placebo, Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Comments Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 45
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0339
Comments Generalized estimating equations for binary response model was used for estimation with factors for treatment, baseline MADRS total score, baseline antidepressant use, assessment time point, and time point-by-treatment interaction.
Method GEE for binary response model
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.06 to 4.09
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Parts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Time Frame Part A: Up to Day 75; Part B: Up to Day 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Part A: All randomized participants; Part B: Safety Set included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B of the study and analyzed as per actual treatment received.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 1 73 78
Count of Participants [Participants]
1
100%
38
51.4%
47
61.8%
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Part B: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Measurements
Description Vital signs included assessments of supine and standing systolic blood pressure (SBP), supine and standing diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate.
Time Frame Part B: From first dose of study drug up to 45 days

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Set (Part B) included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B of the study and analyzed by treatment actually received.
Arm/Group Title Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 73 78
Supine SBP: <90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
0
0%
3
4.1%
Supine SBP: Decrease From Baseline of >=30
2
200%
1
1.4%
Supine SBP: Increase From Baseline of >=30
1
100%
0
0%
Standing SBP: <90 mmHg
5
500%
4
5.4%
Standing SBP: Decrease From Baseline of >=30
4
400%
1
1.4%
Standing SBP: Increase From Baseline of >=30
1
100%
2
2.7%
Supine DBP: <50 mmHg
1
100%
1
1.4%
Supine DBP: Decrease From Baseline of >=20
5
500%
3
4.1%
Supine DBP: Increase From Baseline of >=20
1
100%
5
6.8%
Standing DBP: <50 mmHg
1
100%
1
1.4%
Standing DBP: >110 mmHg
0
0%
1
1.4%
Standing DBP: Decrease From Baseline of >=20
3
300%
7
9.5%
Standing DBP: Increase From Baseline of >=20
3
300%
4
5.4%
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Part B: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Evaluations
Description Laboratory tests included tests of Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis.
Time Frame Part B: From first dose of study drug up to 45 days

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Set (Part B) included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B and analyzed by treatment actually received.
Arm/Group Title Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 73 78
Hematology: Eosinophils >1.5 10^9/Liter(L)
0
0%
1
1.4%
Hematology: Hematocrit <0.359
11
1100%
8
10.8%
Hematology: Hematocrit >0.446
10
1000%
12
16.2%
Hematology: Hemoglobin <110 g/L
12
1200%
6
8.1%
Hematology: Leukocytes <2.5 10^9/L
2
200%
2
2.7%
Hematology: Neutrophils <1.5 10^9/L
15
1500%
11
14.9%
Serum Chemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase >3xUpper Limit of Normal Value (ULN)
1
100%
0
0%
Serum Chemistry: Calcium <2.0 millimoles (mmol)/L
0
0%
1
1.4%
Serum Chemistry: Chloride <90 mmol/L
1
100%
2
2.7%
Serum Chemistry: Glucose <2.8 mmol/L
0
0%
1
1.4%
Serum Chemistry: Glucose >13.9 mmol/L
0
0%
1
1.4%
Serum Chemistry: Phosphate >5 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
2
200%
1
1.4%
Serum Chemistry: Potassium <3.5 mmol/L
0
0%
1
1.4%
Serum Chemistry: Potassium >5.2 mmol/L
6
600%
5
6.8%
Serum Chemistry: Sodium >145 mmol/L
3
300%
5
6.8%
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Part B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter Heart Rate
Description ECG parameters included assessment of the standard 12-lead ECG intervals: QT, QTcF, PR, RR, QRS, and heart rate. Heart rate was measured in terms of beats per minute. Change from Baseline in heart rate at specified time points were reported.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Set (Part B) included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B and analyzed by treatment actually received. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Arm/Group Title Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 73 78
Baseline
68.2
(9.55)
69.9
(10.85)
Change From Baseline at Day 8
0.8
(9.91)
1.5
(12.62)
Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.1
(8.16)
0.9
(12.69)
Change From Baseline at Day 21
2.5
(8.93)
-0.6
(11.33)
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Part B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters-PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval
Description ECG parameters included assessment of the standard 12-lead ECG intervals: QT, QTcF, PR, RR, QRS, and heart rate. Change from Baseline in PR Interval, RR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval is reported.
Time Frame Part B: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 21

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Set (Part B) included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B and analyzed by treatment actually received.
Arm/Group Title Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 73 78
PR Interval: Baseline
151.4
(20.38)
151.7
(17.12)
PR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 8
3.4
(26.97)
0.6
(11.95)
PR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 15
1.1
(11.81)
0.8
(11.02)
PR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 21
2.5
(14.66)
2.5
(11.82)
RR Interval: Baseline
892.2
(131.63)
871.6
(124.16)
RR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-9.9
(137.12)
-16.9
(149.42)
RR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.9
(107.37)
-8.4
(147.36)
RR Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-32.0
(113.89)
13.9
(141.69)
QRS Duration: Baseline
87.3
(9.50)
90.2
(9.81)
QRS Duration: Change From Baseline at Day 8
0.0
(8.19)
-0.3
(6.98)
QRS Duration: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-0.7
(7.14)
-0.3
(6.69)
QRS Duration: Change From Baseline at Day 21
0.1
(7.58)
0.0
(6.84)
QT Interval: Baseline
395.1
(28.85)
393.0
(28.66)
QT Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-5.5
(24.23)
-4.3
(29.89)
QT Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.4
(22.96)
-2.7
(28.53)
QT Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-5.9
(23.70)
0.1
(30.60)
QTcF Interval: Baseline
411.3
(20.92)
412.2
(18.83)
QTcF Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 8
-4.1
(15.80)
-1.7
(15.57)
QTcF Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 15
-1.2
(14.75)
-1.5
(14.94)
QTcF Interval: Change From Baseline at Day 21
-1.1
(19.39)
-1.8
(20.77)
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Part B: Number of Participants With a Response of "Yes" to Any Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behaviors Item Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Description C-SSRS was used to assess the suicidality of participants during the study. The assessment included "yes" or "no" responses for 5 questions, each related to suicidal ideation (wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods, active suicidal ideation with some intent, active suicidal ideation with specific plan) and suicidal behavior (preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, suicide). Numeric ratings were provided for severity of ideation (if present), from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most severe. Number of participants with a response of 'yes' to any suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior item as measured by C-SSRS is reported.
Time Frame Part B: Up to Day 45

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Set (Part B) included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B and analyzed by treatment actually received.
Arm/Group Title Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
Measure Participants 73 78
Suicidal Ideation
13
1300%
6
8.1%
Suicidal Behavior
0
0%
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame Part A: Up to Day 75; Part B: Up to Day 45
Adverse Event Reporting Description Part A: All randomized participants; Part B: Safety Set included all participants who were administered study drug in Part B of the study and analyzed as per actual treatment received.
Arm/Group Title Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Arm/Group Description Participants received SAGE-217, 15 mg, oral solution, BID for first 2 days followed by SAGE-217, 15 or 20 mg, oral solution, BID, starting on Day 3 for up to 14 days as tolerated. Participants received SAGE-217 matching placebo, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days. Participants received SAGE-217, 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily, for up to 14 days.
All Cause Mortality
Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1 (0%) 0/73 (0%) 0/78 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1 (0%) 1/73 (1.4%) 1/78 (1.3%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis 0/1 (0%) 1/73 (1.4%) 0/78 (0%)
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state 0/1 (0%) 0/73 (0%) 1/78 (1.3%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Part A: SAGE-217 15/20 mg Oral Solution Part B: Placebo Part B: SAGE 217 30 mg Capsules
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/1 (100%) 26/73 (35.6%) 31/78 (39.7%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea 0/1 (0%) 2/73 (2.7%) 5/78 (6.4%)
Nausea 0/1 (0%) 6/73 (8.2%) 3/78 (3.8%)
Vomiting 0/1 (0%) 4/73 (5.5%) 1/78 (1.3%)
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection 0/1 (0%) 1/73 (1.4%) 6/78 (7.7%)
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence 0/1 (0%) 8/73 (11%) 12/78 (15.4%)
Headache 0/1 (0%) 9/73 (12.3%) 7/78 (9%)
Dizziness 0/1 (0%) 4/73 (5.5%) 6/78 (7.7%)
Sedation 0/1 (0%) 0/73 (0%) 4/78 (5.1%)
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal dreams 0/1 (0%) 4/73 (5.5%) 0/78 (0%)
Insomnia 1/1 (100%) 0/73 (0%) 0/78 (0%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis 0/1 (0%) 4/73 (5.5%) 0/78 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The PI can either be a party and subject to the same restrictions as the institution, or if not a party, the restrictions are described on the face of the contract (i.e., PI is a contractor of the institution; PI is part of a larger group of study personnel; institution has contracted with or otherwise bound all study personnel under confidentiality obligations and requirements to vest intellectual property to the institution).

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Medical Monitor
Organization Sage Therapeutics
Phone (617) 299-8380
Email info@sagerx.com
Responsible Party:
Sage Therapeutics
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02978326
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 217-PPD-201
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 10, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022