POINTPM: Prediction of Outcome of Interventional Pain Management

Sponsor
Benno Rehberg-Klug (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02774694
Collaborator
(none)
350
20

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Interventional pain management for back and neck pain is widely used, but the indications and relative merits of these techniques rest subject to discussion. This study aims to identify prognostic criteria for patients who might specifically benefit from interventional pain management. Specifically, the nociceptive reflex threshold will be investigated, which is a measure of central sensibilisation and thus a potentially important prognostic factor.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold ("Paintracker", Dolosys GmbH, Berlin, Germany)

Detailed Description

Interventional pain management is resource-intensive and carries non-negligible risks. Not all patients profit equally from such procedures. For those who do not benefit, the risk of potential complications is futile, and the resources are wasted. Therefore, a possibility to distinguish responding patients from non-responders would be important.

Central pain sensitization has been related to poor outcome, and electrical pain and reflex thresholds are a good measure of pain hypersensitivity at least in chronic low back pain. Especially the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold has been identified to correlate well with central pain hypersensibility. Successful interventional pain treatment has been shown to reverse central hypersensibility as measured by the NFR threshold.

NFR threshold, in contrast to pain threshold, seems to be a measure independent of psychological factors. Thus the NFR threshold could give information independent of psychological factors in order to predict poor outcome of interventional pain management procedures.

The study will be a prospective observational trial of diagnostic accuracy.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
350 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Observational Study of the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold to Predict Outcome After Interventional Pain Management Procedures in Patients With Chronic Back and Neck Pain. A Study of Diagnostic Accuracy
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
observational cohort

patients undergoing interventional pain management procedures

Device: nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold ("Paintracker", Dolosys GmbH, Berlin, Germany)
measurement of the NFR threshold using the "Paintracker" device
Other Names:
  • R3 reflex
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. ROC-AUC for incidence of pain reduction>30% at 1 week [1 week]

      Primary study outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of the NFR threshold, measured as area under the "receiver operating characteristic ROC" curve, for the following main pain management outcome: "pain reduction of 30% one week after the interventional procedure

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. ROC-AUC for incidence of pain reduction>30% at 1 month [1 month]

      Area Under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) of the relation between NFR reflex threshold and the incidence of pain reduction>30% at 1 month

    2. ROC-AUC for incidence of pain reduction>30% at 3 months [3 months]

      Area Under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) of the relation between NFR reflex threshold and the incidence of pain reduction>30% at 3 months

    3. ROC-AUC for incidence of pain reduction>30% at 6 months [6 months]

      Area Under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) of the relation between NFR reflex threshold and the incidence of pain reduction>30% at 6 months

    4. ROC-AUC for physical functioning at 1 week [1 week]

    5. ROC-AUC for emotional functioning at 1 week [1 week]

    6. ROC-AUC for patient rating of improvement and satisfaction at 1 week [1 week]

    7. adverse events of interventional pain management [1 week]

    8. patient disposition at 1 week, 1,3, and 6 months [6 months]

      The presence or unexcused absence of the patient at each consultation visit is noted

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • patients with chronic low back or neck pain (duration >3 months)

    • scheduled for the following interventions: epidural injection, facet block, medial branch block, facet radiofrequency denervation, spinal cord stimulator implantation

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • inability to understand the patient information or the study questionnaires

    • patients <18 years old

    • patients with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Benno Rehberg-Klug

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Benno Rehberg-Klug, MD, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Benno Rehberg-Klug, Médecin adjoint agrégé, University Hospital, Geneva
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02774694
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 15-072
    First Posted:
    May 17, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Keywords provided by Benno Rehberg-Klug, Médecin adjoint agrégé, University Hospital, Geneva
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 18, 2022