MP3-RD: Predictive Models for Spine and Lower Extremity Injury After Discharge From Rehab

Sponsor
Brooke Army Medical Center (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02776930
Collaborator
Womack Army Medical Center (U.S. Fed), William Beaumont Army Medical Center (U.S. Fed), Madigan Army Medical Center (U.S. Fed)
480
4
44.6
120
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop algorithms that will help predict future injury and/or re-injury after being returned to duty from a musculoskeletal injury. After completion of an episode of care with a physical therapist, the subjects will undergo a battery of physical performance tests and fill out associated surveys. The subjects will then be followed for a year to identify the occurrence/re-occurence of any injuries. Based on the performance on the physical evaluation tests, algorithms will be derived using regression analysis to predict injury.

Subjects will be recruited from the pool of patients that have recently completed physical rehabilitation in physical therapy clinics for their lower extremity or lumbar/thoracic spine injury.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Subjects will be recruited across 4 medical centers after having completed a regimen of physical therapy for a spine or lower extremity injury. Upon discharge back to full duty, they will be given the opportunity to enroll in the study and undergo a battery of physical performance tests and associated surveys. The subjects will then be followed for a year to identify the occurrence of any injuries. Prediction algorithms will be derived using regression analysis to predict injury based on performance on the physical evaluation tests.

    The overall hypothesis is that Service Member performance on a battery of physical performance tests performed upon discharge from care and return to duty, will be able to predict 1) the risk of sustaining any injury as well as 2) reoccurrence of the same injury that they were seeking care for during the year following discharge from rehabilitation. The current assumption is that when a Service Member is discharged from medical care, it has been done based on the expectation that it is appropriate and safe for them to return to function in their operational environment. Because history of prior injury is a well-established risk factor, every single Service Member that is returned to duty after medical care for a musculoskeletal (MSK) injury is already at a higher risk for future injury than his or her non-injured counterpart. The investigators hypothesize that decreased performance on the proposed testing protocol will be related to increase in the risk of 1 year-injury and recurrence of injury. Successfully identifying those at increased risk of recurrence provides the ability for secondary and tertiary prevention programs to optimize return to duty rates. Injury will be defined as any new musculoskeletal injury or the re-occurrence of the same injury during the 1-year surveillance period.

    The battery of physical performance tests will include: Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA), Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Upper Quarter Y-balance Test (YBT-UQ), Lower Quarter Y-balance Test (YBT-LQ), Closed Kinetic Chain Dorsiflexion (CKC DF), a Single Hop Test, Triple Hop Test, Triple Crossover Hop Test, Carry Test, and a un-weighted and weighted 300 yard Shuttle Run Test.

    Each subject will then also be contacted monthly via a SMS (Short Message Service, e.g. text message) survey for the following year to identify information about additional injury or profile that they may have sustained during the prior period of time. Information about injury will also be calculated from patient chart reviews and Department of Defense healthcare utilization database (claims data). This will provide a robust method in which to capture data injury data regardless of subject availability for follow-up.

    Subjects will be dichotomized as injured or non-injured based on the injury surveillance data. Key demographic, physical performance (FMS, YBT, SFMA, Hop Test, Carry test, & Shuttle Run), and self-report measures will be examined for group differences. Potential predictor variables will be entered into a backward stepwise logistic regression model to determine the most accurate set of variables predictive of musculoskeletal injury status.

    Risk stratification (low, moderate, or high) will be based on likelihood ratios (LR) associated with the clinical prediction rule for injury outlined above. A positive LR > 10 will place the individual as high risk, a LR between 2 and 10 would place the individual as moderate risk. Those with a positive LR less than 2 will be listed as low risk.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    480 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Development of Predictive Models for Lower Extremity, Lumbar, and Thoracic Injury After Discharge From Physical Rehabilitation
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Mar 1, 2016
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Sep 19, 2018
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Nov 19, 2019

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Return to Duty after Rehab from Injury

    Patients deemed healthy enough to return to full duty without any restrictions after completing a course of rehabilitation for a lumbar/thoracic spine or lower extremity injury.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Injury Occurrence [1 year]

      Monthly SMS survey capturing new musculoskeletal injury since the prior survey

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Injury-Related Healthcare Utilization [1 year]

      Healthcare utilization for musculoskeletal injury taken from the Tricare claims database (MHS Data Repository)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 45 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Active duty service member eligible for Tricare benefits

    2. Lower extremity or lumbar/thoracic spine injury is the patient's primary complaint.

    3. Determined fit for duty (cleared to return to work) after completing a course of physical therapy for a lower extremity or lumbar/thoracic spine musculoskeletal injury

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Individuals planing on leaving the military within the next 10 months.

    2. Trauma or polytrauma that results in amputation of any limbs or appendages.

    3. Pregnancy, or recently pregnant within the last 6 months - subjects that become pregnant during the course of the study will be withdrawn based on the different injury risk factors that are associated with pregnancy.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Womack Army Medical Center Fort Bragg North Carolina United States 28307
    2 William Beaumont Army Medical Center Fort Bliss Texas United States 79920
    3 Brooke Army Medical Center San Antonio Texas United States 78234
    4 Madigan Army Medical Center Tacoma Washington United States 98431

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Brooke Army Medical Center
    • Womack Army Medical Center
    • William Beaumont Army Medical Center
    • Madigan Army Medical Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Daniel Rhon, DSc, Brooke Army Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Dan Rhon, Director of Physical Therapy, Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02776930
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 215032
    First Posted:
    May 18, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 18, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Keywords provided by Dan Rhon, Director of Physical Therapy, Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 18, 2020