The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration

Sponsor
Bahçeşehir University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04818658
Collaborator
(none)
26
1
9.1
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars

Detailed Description

comparing the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
26 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Other
Official Title:
The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration: A 5-year Retro-prospective Clinical Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 8, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 3, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 10, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Preformed Metal Crowns using Hall Technique

Other: Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars
Intra-oral clinical examination is performed and restorations are evaluated by the practitioner. Periapical radiography is taken according to national guidelines.

Compomer Restoration

Other: Assessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars
Intra-oral clinical examination is performed and restorations are evaluated by the practitioner. Periapical radiography is taken according to national guidelines.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The survival rate of Hall Technique and Compomer Restorations [5 year]

    Successful: restoration satisfactory, no additional treatment required, no clinical sign and symptoms of pulpal pathology or tooth exfoliated, Minor failure: restoration wear/fracture/loss (restorable) or crown perforation, secondary caries or new caries, reversible pulpitis treated without requiring extraction or pulpotomy, Major failure: the tooth is broken down (unrestorable), inter-radicular radiolucency or internal root resorption, signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis requiring extraction or pulpotomy. The survival analysis: the restorations are assessed as successful or failure.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
5 Years to 8 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients aged five to eight years at the time of dental treatment,

  • patients attending follow-up appointments

  • patients with compomer restoration and Hall restoration in their teeth

  • patients with matching the extent of caries in the two groups

Exclusion Criteria:
  • patients not attending follow-up appointments

  • patients without both treatment

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Bahcesehir University Istanbul Turkey

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bahçeşehir University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Betul Sen Yavuz, Bahçeşehir University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Betul Sen Yavuz, Assistant Professor, Bahçeşehir University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04818658
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 441555555
First Posted:
Mar 26, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 21, 2022