A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DR-103 for the Prevention of Pregnancy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is an open-label, single-treatment study. All subjects will receive 12 months of oral contraceptive therapy with DR-103. Study participants will receive physical and gynecological exams, including Pap smear. During the study, all participants will be required to complete a diary.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: DR-103 Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. |
Drug: DR-103
One tablet daily.
Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen:
42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)
- Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)
- Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)
- All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)
- Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)
- Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)
- Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [Day 1 up to 13 months]
The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.
- Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight [Day 1 up to year 1]
A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Sexually active at risk for pregnancy
-
Agreement to use study OC therapy as their only method of birth control during the study
-
history of regular spontaneous menstrual cycles or withdrawal bleeding episodes
-
Others as dictated by FDA-approved protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Any contraindication to the use of oral contraceptives
-
Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant in the next 14 months
-
Smoker and age ≥ 35 years
-
Others as dictated by FDA-approved protocol
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Montgomery | Alabama | United States | 36116 |
2 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85015 |
3 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85037 |
4 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | United States | 85741 |
5 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | 72205 |
6 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Anaheim | California | United States | 92801 |
7 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Irvine | California | United States | 92618 |
8 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90033 |
9 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | National City | California | United States | 91950 |
10 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | United States | 29103 |
11 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | United States | 92108 |
12 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | United States | 92123 |
13 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Francisco | California | United States | 92103 |
14 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Torrance | California | United States | 90502 |
15 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | 80909 |
16 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Pueblo | Colorado | United States | 81001 |
17 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20036 |
18 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Clearwater | Florida | United States | 33759 |
19 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32207 |
20 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Leesburg | Florida | United States | 34748 |
21 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | United States | 33143 |
22 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | United States | 33186 |
23 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Port Richey | Florida | United States | 34652 |
24 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Palm Beach | Florida | United States | 33409 |
25 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | St. Petersburg | Florida | United States | 33709 |
26 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33613 |
27 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States | 33401 |
28 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30303 |
29 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Decatur | Georgia | United States | 30034 |
30 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Roswell | Georgia | United States | 30075 |
31 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Sandy Springs | Georgia | United States | 30328 |
32 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Savannah | Georgia | United States | 31406 |
33 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Meridian | Idaho | United States | 83642 |
34 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Champaign | Illinois | United States | 61820 |
35 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas | United States | 67207 |
36 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky | United States | 40509 |
37 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | 40291 |
38 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Mt Sterling | Kentucky | United States | 40353 |
39 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | United States | 70808 |
40 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Metairie | Louisiana | United States | 70006 |
41 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21201 |
42 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 64108 |
43 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | St. Louis | Missouri | United States | 63117 |
44 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lincoln | Nebraska | United States | 68510 |
45 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | 89146 |
46 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Berlin | New Jersey | United States | 08009 |
47 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lawrenceville | New Jersey | United States | 08648 |
48 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Moorestown | New Jersey | United States | 08057 |
49 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Brunswick | New Jersey | United States | 08901 |
50 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States | 87102 |
51 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Port Jefferson | New York | United States | 11777 |
52 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Rochester | New York | United States | 14609 |
53 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Cary | North Carolina | United States | 27518 |
54 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28209 |
55 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Bern | North Carolina | United States | 28562 |
56 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States | 27609 |
57 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States | 27612 |
58 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Salisbury | North Carolina | United States | 28144 |
59 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Wilmington | North Carolina | United States | 28401 |
60 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27103 |
61 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43210 |
62 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43213 |
63 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Edmond | Oklahoma | United States | 73013 |
64 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73112 |
65 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Eugene | Oregon | United States | 97401 |
66 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Medford | Oregon | United States | 97504 |
67 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19114 |
68 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15206 |
69 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | 29425 |
70 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbia | South Carolina | United States | 29201 |
71 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Goose Creek | South Carolina | United States | 29445 |
72 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Greenville | South Carolina | United States | 29605 |
73 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Greer | South Carolina | United States | 29651 |
74 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Hilton Head Island | South Carolina | United States | 29926 |
75 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Bristol | Tennessee | United States | 37620 |
76 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Jackson | Tennessee | United States | 38305 |
77 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Knoxville | Tennessee | United States | 37920 |
78 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee | United States | 38120 |
79 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37203 |
80 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Austin | Texas | United States | 78759 |
81 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75234 |
82 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75390 |
83 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Ft. Worth | Texas | United States | 76135 |
84 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | United States | 77054 |
85 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
86 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Waco | Texas | United States | 76712 |
87 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84107 |
88 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Arlington | Virginia | United States | 22203 |
89 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Newport News | Virginia | United States | 23602 |
90 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | 23502 |
91 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | 23507 |
92 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23233 |
93 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98105 |
94 | Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tacoma | Washington | United States | 98405 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Teva Women's Health
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- DR-103-301
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | A total of 4,962 subjects were screened for participation in this study, and 3,597 took at least one dose of investigational product (Safety population). |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103 |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 3597 |
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population | 3019 |
COMPLETED | 2144 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1453 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | DR-103 |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. |
Overall Participants | 3597 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
27.4
(7.0)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
3597
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
14
0.4%
|
Asian |
78
2.2%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
10
0.3%
|
Black or African American |
696
19.3%
|
White |
2324
64.6%
|
Hispanic or Latino |
404
11.2%
|
Other |
71
2%
|
Height (inches) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [inches] |
64.6
(2.7)
|
Weight (pounds) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [pounds] |
162.5
(43.2)
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
27.4
(7.0)
|
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg] |
113.1
(10.4)
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg] |
72.3
(8.3)
|
Heart Rate (beats/minute) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [beats/minute] |
74.6
(10.0)
|
Oral Contraceptive Use History (participants) [Number] | |
Continuous user |
1570
43.6%
|
New Start |
619
17.2%
|
Prior User |
1408
39.1%
|
Smoking Status (participants) [Number] | |
Current Smoker |
602
16.7%
|
Former Smoker |
636
17.7%
|
Never Smoked |
2359
65.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle. |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2769 | 2276 | 493 |
Measure Treatment cycles | 9217 | 7633 | 1584 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
2.82
|
2.46
|
4.54
|
Title | Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'Typical-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods including condoms were used. |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2606 | 2149 | 457 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
3.25
|
2.83
|
5.32
|
Title | Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2505 | 2067 | 438 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
3.71
|
3.23
|
6.04
|
Title | All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle. |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2769 | 2276 | 493 |
Cycle 1 |
0.0074
|
0.0060
|
0.0139
|
Cycle 2 |
0.0134
|
0.0114
|
0.0231
|
Cycle 3 |
0.0212
|
0.0185
|
0.0339
|
Cycle 4 |
0.0272
|
0.0239
|
0.0429
|
Title | All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle. |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 3019 | 2479 | 540 |
Measure Treatment cycles | 30785 | 25487 | 5298 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
2.74
|
2.40
|
4.42
|
Title | Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'Typical-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle and no other birth control methods including condoms were used. |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2972 | 2436 | 536 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
2.92
|
2.55
|
4.72
|
Title | Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2941 | 2531 | 531 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure] |
3.07
|
2.68
|
4.94
|
Title | Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events |
---|---|
Description | The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention. |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to 13 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety population of treated participants |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103 |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. |
Measure Participants | 3597 |
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) |
2605
72.4%
|
Treatment-related AEs |
1086
30.2%
|
Serious AEs |
58
1.6%
|
TEAEs leading to discontinuation |
463
12.9%
|
Title | Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
---|---|
Description | A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. |
Time Frame | Day 1 up to year 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication |
Arm/Group Title | DR-103: Total | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
Measure Participants | 2505 | 2067 | 438 |
Cycle 1 |
0.0080
|
0.0062
|
0.0164
|
Cycle 2 |
0.0134
|
0.0116
|
0.0215
|
Cycle 3 |
0.0236
|
0.0203
|
0.0392
|
Cycle 4 |
0.0291
|
0.0256
|
0.0457
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Day 1 - one year and three weeks | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | DR-103 | |
Arm/Group Description | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
DR-103 | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
DR-103 | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 58/3597 (1.6%) | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Anemia | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Cardiac disorders | ||
Supraventricular tachycardia | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Atrial fibrillation | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Angina pectoris | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | ||
Hip dysplasia | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Colitis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Abdominal pain | 3/3597 (0.1%) | |
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Ileitis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||
Cholecystitis | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Cholelithiasis | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Cholecystitis acute | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Pneumonia | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Staphylococcal infection | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pelvic inflammatory disease | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pharyngitis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Hepatitis C | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Viral infection | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Rectal abscess | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Appendicitis | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Urinary tract infection | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pyelonephritis | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Salpingitis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Helicobacter gastritis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Injury | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Overdose | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Lower limb fracture | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Spinal fracture | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Joint injury | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Multiple drug overdose | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Bursitis | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pain in extremity | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Intervertebral disc protrusion | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Convulsion | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Convulsion | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Syncope | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Headache | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | ||
Abortion spontaneous | 5/3597 (0.1%) | |
Abortion missed | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Premature separation of placenta | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Blighted ovum | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Ectopic pregnancy | 2/3597 (0.1%) | |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Depression suicidal | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Depression | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Suicide attempt | 5/3597 (0.1%) | |
Anxiety | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Mental status changes | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Drug dependence | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
Uterine inflammation | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Pleural effusion | 1/3597 (0%) | |
Vascular disorders | ||
Deep vein thrombosis | 3/3597 (0.1%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
DR-103 | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1567/3597 (43.6%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Nausea | 241/3597 (6.7%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Nasopharyngitis | 342/3597 (9.5%) | |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 323/3597 (9%) | |
Sinusitis | 246/3597 (6.8%) | |
Urinary tract infection | 214/3597 (5.9%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Headache | 420/3597 (11.7%) | |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
Metrorrhagia | 216/3597 (6%) | |
Dysmenorrhoea | 188/3597 (5.2%) | |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
Acne | 193/3597 (5.4%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Details of the study and its results shall not be publicized or published in any form to cooperative publication without prior, written consent of sponsor. Such approval is necessary to prevent premature disclosure of trade secrets and other confidential information.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Director, Clinical Research |
---|---|
Organization | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. |
Phone | 215-591-3000 |
ustevatrials@tevapharm.com |
- DR-103-301