Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation for Maternal Anemia Prevention in Tanzania ( MMS-MAP ) - MMS vs IFA Trial

Sponsor
George Washington University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06069856
Collaborator
Ifakara Health Institute (Other), Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) (Other), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (Other), Africa Academy for Public Health (Other), Columbia University (Other)
130
2
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a mixed methods cross-over study to compare acceptability of IFA with 60 mg of iron to MMS with 60 mg of iron. This cross-over study will help contribute evidence to the remaining question about acceptability, preference adherence, and side effects between IFA and MMS (with the same amount of iron). By holding the amount of iron constant, the study can help answer the question about whether the addition of micronutrients affects adherence or acceptability.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Dietary Supplement: Iron Folic Acid Tablets with 60 mg of iron
  • Dietary Supplement: Multiple Micronutrient Supplements with 60 mg of elemental iron
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
130 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) The trial is quadruple blind with all trial participants, outcome assessors (research staff and care providers), investigators, and trials statistician and data analysts being unable to determine the allocated trial arm for any trial participant or identify trial participants who are on the same trial regimen.
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Individually Randomized Trial of Higher-dose Iron (60 mg, 45 mg) Compared to Low-dose Iron (30 mg) in Multiple Micronutrient Supplements in Pregnancy on Moderate and Severe Maternal Anemia- MMS Versus IFA Crossover Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2025
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: MMS with 60 mg of iron first, then IFA with 60 mg of iron

Women will receive the first regimen (MMS with 60 mg of iron) for 2 months and then crossover on to the second regimen (IFA with 60 mg of iron) for 2 months

Dietary Supplement: Iron Folic Acid Tablets with 60 mg of iron
IFA with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. IFA with 60 mg of iron will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization

Dietary Supplement: Multiple Micronutrient Supplements with 60 mg of elemental iron
MMS with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. MMS with 60 mg of iron plus standard UNIMMAP formulation for other 14 micronutrients will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization.

Experimental: IFA with 60 mg of iron first, then MMS with 60 mg of iron

Women will receive the first regimen (IFA with 60 mg of iron) for 2 months and then crossover on to the second regimen (MMS with 60 mg of iron) for 2 months

Dietary Supplement: Iron Folic Acid Tablets with 60 mg of iron
IFA with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. IFA with 60 mg of iron will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization

Dietary Supplement: Multiple Micronutrient Supplements with 60 mg of elemental iron
MMS with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. MMS with 60 mg of iron plus standard UNIMMAP formulation for other 14 micronutrients will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Acceptability of MMS formulation [Month 1]

    To assess acceptability of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using Likert scales

  2. Preference of MMS formulation [Month 1]

    To assess preference of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  3. Side Effects of MMS formulation [Month 1]

    To assess perceived side effects of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron through questionnaires

  4. Acceptability of MMS formulation [Month 2]

    To assess acceptability of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using Likert scales

  5. Preference of MMS formulation [Month 2]

    To assess preference of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  6. Side Effects of MMS formulation [Month 2]

    To assess perceived side effects of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  7. Acceptability of MMS formulation [Month 3]

    To assess acceptability of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using Likert scales

  8. Preference of MMS formulation [Month 3]

    To assess preference of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  9. Side Effects of MMS formulation [Month 3]

    To assess perceived side effects of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  10. Acceptability of IFA formulation [Month 1]

    To assess acceptability of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using Likert scale

  11. Preference of IFA formulation [Month 1]

    To assess preference of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  12. Side Effects of IFA formulation [Month 1]

    To assess perceived side effects of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  13. Acceptability of IFA formulation [Month 2]

    To assess acceptability of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using Likert scale

  14. Preference of IFA formulation [Month 2]

    To assess preference of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  15. Side Effects of IFA formulation [Month 2]

    To assess perceived side effects of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  16. Acceptability of IFA formulation [Month 3]

    To assess acceptability of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using Likert scales

  17. Preference of IFA formulation [Month 3]

    To assess preference of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

  18. Side Effects of IFA formulation [Month 3]

    To assess perceived side effects of IFA containing 60 mg of iron using questionnaires

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Attending first ANC visit at the study clinic

  • Pregnant women ≤ 15 weeks of gestation

  • Aged ≥ 18 years

  • Intending to stay in the study area for the duration of study

  • Provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Severe anemia (defined as Hb <8.5 g/dL per Tanzania standard of care)

  • Sickle cell disease (homozygous) as tested by HemoTypeSC

  • Concurrent participation in other nutritional supplementation trial

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • George Washington University
  • Ifakara Health Institute
  • Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
  • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • Africa Academy for Public Health
  • Columbia University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blair Wylie, MD, MPH, Columbia University
  • Principal Investigator: Honorati Masanja, PhD, Ifakara Health Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Alfa Muhihi, PhD, Africa Academy of Public Health
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Pembe, MD, MMed, PhD, FCOG, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Emily R Smith, ScD, MPH, The George Washington University
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher R Sudfeld, ScD, ScM, Harvard University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
George Washington University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06069856
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MMS-MAP IFA Crossover
First Posted:
Oct 6, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Oct 6, 2023
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by George Washington University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 6, 2023