Comparison of Fluoxetine, Calcium and Placebo for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)

Sponsor
Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00965562
Collaborator
Yale University (Other)
49
1
3
121
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate to fluoxetine in the treatment of moderate to severe PMS. Second, to compare each active agent to a placebo control. Third, to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment for specific symptom clusters (i.e. affective and somatic). Fourth, to determine whether the addition of calcium to on going fluoxetine treatment leads to additional therapeutic benefit.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, parallel study that will randomize 60 women at the Yale site into treatment. Participants will be screened at various collaborating ob-gyn centers for possible PMS symptoms, and direct referrals from the community will also be accepted. Subject participation length is about 7 months with 6 scheduled study visits.

Methodology: After successfully completing the screening and qualification phase, participants will be randomized to treatment at Visit 1 for 5 cycles of double-blind treatment. Participants will be evaluated monthly during the randomization phase for adverse events, concurrent medication, and primary and secondary efficacy variables.

.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
49 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Double-blind, Parallel Comparison of Fluoxetine, Calcium and Placebo for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2000
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: I

Fluoxetine

Drug: Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. For the fifth menstrual cycle, all women will receive calcium. Women on Fluoxetine will continue taking it in addition to 1200mg of calcium.
Other Names:
  • Prozac
  • Active Comparator: II

    Calcium

    Drug: Calcium
    1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 5 menstrual cycles.

    Placebo Comparator: III

    Drug: Placebo
    For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo. At the end of the fourth cycle, all women will receive 1200 mg of calcium in addition to the placebo medication.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Comparison of the Change in IDS Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    2. Comparison of the Change in PMTS Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    3. Comparison of the Change in CGI-S Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression-Severity: a severity scale widely used in psychopharmacology research (1=normal not at all ill, 7=among most extremely ill). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    4. Comparison of the Change in DRSP Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    5. Comparison of the Change in CGI Improvement Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      CGI-I = Clinical Global Impression Improvement: the improvement subscale of CGI measuring change at each visit as compared to visit 1 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of Participants With DRSP LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      DRSP: Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. LOCF: the last observation carried forward.

    2. Proportion of Participants With IDS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      IDS: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=least severe, 84=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.

    3. Proportion of Participants With PMTS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      PMTS: Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.

    4. Proportion of Participants With DRSP Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme.

    5. Proportion of Patients With IDS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency, sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe).

    6. Proportion of Patients With PMTS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]

      Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 48 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Female outpatients between the ages of 18 and 48 who are:

    • Menstruating

    • Meet criteria for moderate to severe PMS

    • Report PMS symptoms for at least 9 our of the 12 months prior to screening; 4) *Are using an adequate method of birth control.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Any candidate who:

    • Fulfills MINI (DSM-IV) criteria for a serious AXIS 1 disorder

    • Fulfills DSM-IV criteria during the charting phase consistent with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder

    • Has a severe, co-existing condition that, in the investigator's opinion, renders the patient unsuitable for the study

    • Poses a significant risk of suicide

    • Takes ongoing medication that could treat PMS symptoms

    • Has a history of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to fluoxetine or calcium

    • Is lactating, pregnant or is planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut United States 06510

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Donaghue Medical Research Foundation
    • Yale University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Kimberly A Yonkers, MD, Yale School of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Kimberly Yonkers, Professor, Yale University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00965562
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0001011511
    • NCT00683605
    First Posted:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Keywords provided by Kimberly Yonkers, Professor, Yale University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Recruitment occurred through on-site screening in private gynecological practices and community advertisements. Recruitment occurred between 2001-2005 in Providence, Rhode Island and between 2001-2009 in New Haven, Connecticut. Potential subjects provided consent for screening and assessment.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 16 17 16
    Women With at Least 2 Follow up Visits 13 13 13
    Women Who Participated Full Follow up 6 10 11
    COMPLETED 13 13 13
    NOT COMPLETED 3 4 3

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 13 13 13 39
    Age, Customized (participants) [Number]
    25-29 years old
    1
    7.7%
    1
    7.7%
    2
    15.4%
    4
    10.3%
    30-39 years old
    11
    84.6%
    6
    46.2%
    7
    53.8%
    24
    61.5%
    40-45 years old
    1
    7.7%
    6
    46.2%
    4
    30.8%
    11
    28.2%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    13
    100%
    13
    100%
    13
    100%
    39
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
    White
    8
    61.5%
    10
    76.9%
    10
    76.9%
    28
    71.8%
    Black
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    Hispanic
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    1
    7.7%
    2
    5.1%
    Other/Mixed
    2
    15.4%
    1
    7.7%
    1
    7.7%
    4
    10.3%
    Not collected
    1
    7.7%
    2
    15.4%
    1
    7.7%
    4
    10.3%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    13
    100%
    13
    100%
    13
    100%
    39
    100%
    Marital Status (participants) [Number]
    Married
    7
    53.8%
    8
    61.5%
    9
    69.2%
    24
    61.5%
    Single/Divorced/Widowed
    5
    38.5%
    5
    38.5%
    4
    30.8%
    14
    35.9%
    Not collected
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    Number of pregnancies (participants) [Number]
    0 pregnancies
    6
    46.2%
    3
    23.1%
    5
    38.5%
    14
    35.9%
    1 pregnancy
    3
    23.1%
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    4
    10.3%
    2+ pregnancies
    4
    30.8%
    9
    69.2%
    8
    61.5%
    21
    53.8%
    Years with PMS (participants) [Number]
    <4 years
    6
    46.2%
    2
    15.4%
    6
    46.2%
    14
    35.9%
    5-10 years
    3
    23.1%
    6
    46.2%
    1
    7.7%
    10
    25.6%
    >10 years
    3
    23.1%
    5
    38.5%
    6
    46.2%
    14
    35.9%
    Number of years not collected
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    Ever spoken to a doctor about PMS (participants) [Number]
    Number [participants]
    4
    30.8%
    5
    38.5%
    6
    46.2%
    15
    38.5%
    OB-GYN asked about PMS (participants) [Number]
    Number [participants]
    2
    15.4%
    5
    38.5%
    2
    15.4%
    9
    23.1%
    Thought about getting help for PMS (participants) [Number]
    Number [participants]
    7
    53.8%
    7
    53.8%
    6
    46.2%
    20
    51.3%
    Concurrent oral contraceptive use (participants) [Number]
    Number [participants]
    4
    30.8%
    3
    23.1%
    3
    23.1%
    10
    25.6%
    Baseline Symptom Scores (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C30)
    31.85
    (9.14)
    30.92
    (7.62)
    28.85
    (9.97)
    30.54
    (5.17)
    Premenstrual Tension Syndrome-Observer (PMTS-O)
    24.15
    (5.40)
    21.58
    (3.73)
    20.85
    (6.62)
    22.19
    (3.11)
    Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP)
    2.16
    (0.86)
    1.12
    (0.38)
    1.29
    (0.60)
    1.52
    (0.37)
    Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S)
    4.92
    (0.95)
    4.46
    (1.27)
    4.15
    (1.28)
    4.51
    (0.68)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Participants With DRSP LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description DRSP: Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. LOCF: the last observation carried forward.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 10 12 12
    Number [proportion of participants]
    0.80
    6.2%
    0.42
    3.2%
    0.42
    3.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.15
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Participants With IDS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description IDS: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=least severe, 84=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Number [proportion of participants]
    0.77
    5.9%
    0.31
    2.4%
    0.31
    2.4%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.05
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Participants With PMTS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description PMTS: Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 12 13
    Number [proportion of participants]
    0.62
    4.8%
    0.33
    2.5%
    0.16
    1.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.06
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Participants With DRSP Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5. However, Visit 5 DRSP calendars were missing for an additional 3 subjects in the fluoxetine group and for one subject in each of the calcium and placebo cells.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 5 8 6
    Number [proportion of participants]
    1.00
    7.7%
    0.50
    3.8%
    0.33
    2.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.09
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Patients With IDS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency, sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe).
    Time Frame over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 8 11 12
    Number [proportion of participants]
    1.00
    7.7%
    0.36
    2.8%
    0.33
    2.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.005
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Patients With PMTS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement)
    Description Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe).
    Time Frame over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 8 11 12
    Number [proportion of participants]
    0.75
    5.8%
    0.36
    2.8%
    0.17
    1.3%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.04
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Comparison of the Change in IDS Symptom Scores Among Groups
    Description IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intention to treat cohort.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Visit 1
    31.85
    (9.14)
    30.92
    (7.62)
    28.85
    (9.97)
    Visit 2
    14.08
    (9.53)
    25.77
    (7.74)
    20.69
    (12.20)
    Visit 3
    11.44
    (7.94)
    18.55
    (10.40)
    20.15
    (14.25)
    Visit 4
    11.78
    (8.50)
    18.50
    (9.01)
    16.46
    (11.00)
    Visit 5
    10.00
    (6.41)
    19.55
    (9.04)
    18.08
    (9.17)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.07
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -2.63
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.51 to 0.24
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group IDS score as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.94
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.10
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.85 to 2.65
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in calcium group IDS scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.07
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 1.15
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.94
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.10
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    8. Primary Outcome
    Title Comparison of the Change in PMTS Symptom Scores Among Groups
    Description PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intention to treat cohort.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Visit 1
    24.15
    (5.40)
    21.58
    (3.73)
    20.85
    (6.62)
    Visit 2
    11.15
    (5.77)
    18.54
    (5.36)
    16.00
    (8.15)
    Visit 3
    10.33
    (6.40)
    13.36
    (5.75)
    16.38
    (10.52)
    Visit 4
    12.11
    (7.13)
    12.83
    (4.73)
    12.77
    (8.21)
    Visit 5
    10.13
    (3.56)
    11.91
    (4.48)
    14.58
    (7.58)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.10
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -1.63
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -3.60 to 0.34
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group PMTS scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.40
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.81
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.71 to 1.09
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in calcium group PMTS scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.10
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 1.06
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.40
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.37
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    9. Primary Outcome
    Title Comparison of the Change in CGI-S Symptom Scores Among Groups
    Description CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression-Severity: a severity scale widely used in psychopharmacology research (1=normal not at all ill, 7=among most extremely ill). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intention to treat cohort.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Visit 1
    4.92
    (0.95)
    4.46
    (1.27)
    4.15
    (1.28)
    Visit 2
    2.54
    (1.13)
    4.23
    (1.01)
    3.38
    (1.66)
    Visit 3
    2.33
    (1.00)
    3.00
    (1.10)
    3.38
    (1.98)
    Visit 4
    2.56
    (1.13)
    2.73
    (0.90)
    2.92
    (1.50)
    Visit 5
    2.50
    (0.76)
    2.91
    (1.04)
    3.17
    (1.47)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.07
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.35
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.73 to 0.03
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group CGI-S scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.36
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.17
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.54 to 0.20
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in calcium group CGI-S scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.07
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.92
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.36
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.44
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    10. Primary Outcome
    Title Comparison of the Change in DRSP Symptom Scores Among Groups
    Description DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intention to treat cohort.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Visit 1
    2.16
    (0.86)
    1.12
    (0.38)
    1.29
    (0.60)
    Visit 2
    0.97
    (0.72)
    0.76
    (0.78)
    0.93
    (0.54)
    Visit 3
    0.27
    (0.78)
    0.61
    (0.78)
    1.19
    (1.06)
    Visit 4
    0.72
    (0.78)
    0.51
    (0.33)
    0.59
    (0.63)
    Visit 5
    0.44
    (0.34)
    0.75
    (0.42)
    0.74
    (0.54)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.02
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.28
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.53 to -0.04
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group DRSP scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.58
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value 0.06
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.16 to 0.28
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in calcium group DRSP scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.02
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 2.08
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.58
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.18
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    11. Primary Outcome
    Title Comparison of the Change in CGI Improvement Scores Among Groups
    Description CGI-I = Clinical Global Impression Improvement: the improvement subscale of CGI measuring change at each visit as compared to visit 1 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
    Time Frame over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intention to treat cohort.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    Measure Participants 13 13 13
    Visit 1
    NA
    (NA)
    NA
    (NA)
    NA
    (NA)
    Visit 2
    2.23
    (0.83)
    3.46
    (0.78)
    3.00
    (1.35)
    Visit 3
    1.67
    (0.87)
    2.30
    (0.82)
    3.08
    (1.50)
    Visit 4
    1.75
    (1.16)
    2.36
    (1.03)
    2.77
    (1.17)
    Visit 5
    1.88
    (0.64)
    2.45
    (0.82)
    2.83
    (1.19)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.04
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -1.03
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.70 to -0.35
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group CGI Improvement scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.54
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Slope
    Estimated Value -0.20
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.86 to 0.46
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Slope represents average change in calcium group CGI Improvement scores as compared to placebo
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.04
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.80
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 2 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 2 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection II: Calcium, III: Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.54
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Cohen's d effect size
    Estimated Value 0.32
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 2 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 2 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From patient randomization to completion of study
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Final adverse event data were only available for the 32 patients randomized at the Yale site. There were no severe adverse events by self-report. Events were uncommon and occurred in all 3 groups with a numerically higher number in the calcium group.
    Arm/Group Title I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo.
    All Cause Mortality
    I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 0/11 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    I: Fluoxetine II: Calcium III: Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 4/10 (40%) 8/11 (72.7%) 2/11 (18.2%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal ache 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0
    Burping 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0
    Constipation 1/10 (10%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0
    Decreased appetite 0/10 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1
    Diarrhea 1/10 (10%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0
    Nausea 1/10 (10%) 1 4/11 (36.4%) 4 2/11 (18.2%) 2
    General disorders
    Feeling spacy 0/10 (0%) 0 2/11 (18.2%) 2 0/11 (0%) 0
    Difficulty Concentrating 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0
    Dizziness 1/10 (10%) 1 2/11 (18.2%) 2 0/11 (0%) 0
    Dry mouth 2/10 (20%) 2 0/11 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0
    Fatigue 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 1/11 (9.1%) 1
    Headache 1/10 (10%) 1 3/11 (27.3%) 3 2/11 (18.2%) 2
    Irritability 0/10 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1
    Sweating 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0
    Vertigo 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Cramps 1/10 (10%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0 0/11 (0%) 0
    Decreased sex drive 0/10 (0%) 0 1/11 (9.1%) 1 0/11 (0%) 0

    Limitations/Caveats

    small sample size

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Kimberly Yonkers
    Organization Donaghue Medical Research Foundation
    Phone 1-203-764-6621
    Email Kimberly.Yonkers@yale.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Kimberly Yonkers, Professor, Yale University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00965562
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0001011511
    • NCT00683605
    First Posted:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2015