Comparison of Fluoxetine, Calcium and Placebo for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate to fluoxetine in the treatment of moderate to severe PMS. Second, to compare each active agent to a placebo control. Third, to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment for specific symptom clusters (i.e. affective and somatic). Fourth, to determine whether the addition of calcium to on going fluoxetine treatment leads to additional therapeutic benefit.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This is a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, parallel study that will randomize 60 women at the Yale site into treatment. Participants will be screened at various collaborating ob-gyn centers for possible PMS symptoms, and direct referrals from the community will also be accepted. Subject participation length is about 7 months with 6 scheduled study visits.
Methodology: After successfully completing the screening and qualification phase, participants will be randomized to treatment at Visit 1 for 5 cycles of double-blind treatment. Participants will be evaluated monthly during the randomization phase for adverse events, concurrent medication, and primary and secondary efficacy variables.
.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: I Fluoxetine |
Drug: Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. For the fifth menstrual cycle, all women will receive calcium. Women on Fluoxetine will continue taking it in addition to 1200mg of calcium.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: II Calcium |
Drug: Calcium
1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 5 menstrual cycles.
|
Placebo Comparator: III
|
Drug: Placebo
For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo. At the end of the fourth cycle, all women will receive 1200 mg of calcium in addition to the placebo medication.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Comparison of the Change in IDS Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
- Comparison of the Change in PMTS Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
- Comparison of the Change in CGI-S Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression-Severity: a severity scale widely used in psychopharmacology research (1=normal not at all ill, 7=among most extremely ill). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
- Comparison of the Change in DRSP Symptom Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
- Comparison of the Change in CGI Improvement Scores Among Groups [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
CGI-I = Clinical Global Impression Improvement: the improvement subscale of CGI measuring change at each visit as compared to visit 1 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of Participants With DRSP LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
DRSP: Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. LOCF: the last observation carried forward.
- Proportion of Participants With IDS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
IDS: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=least severe, 84=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.
- Proportion of Participants With PMTS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
PMTS: Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward.
- Proportion of Participants With DRSP Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme.
- Proportion of Patients With IDS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency, sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe).
- Proportion of Patients With PMTS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) [over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit]
Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Female outpatients between the ages of 18 and 48 who are:
-
Menstruating
-
Meet criteria for moderate to severe PMS
-
Report PMS symptoms for at least 9 our of the 12 months prior to screening; 4) *Are using an adequate method of birth control.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Any candidate who:
-
Fulfills MINI (DSM-IV) criteria for a serious AXIS 1 disorder
-
Fulfills DSM-IV criteria during the charting phase consistent with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder
-
Has a severe, co-existing condition that, in the investigator's opinion, renders the patient unsuitable for the study
-
Poses a significant risk of suicide
-
Takes ongoing medication that could treat PMS symptoms
-
Has a history of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to fluoxetine or calcium
-
Is lactating, pregnant or is planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yale School of Medicine | New Haven | Connecticut | United States | 06510 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Donaghue Medical Research Foundation
- Yale University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kimberly A Yonkers, MD, Yale School of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 0001011511
- NCT00683605
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Recruitment occurred through on-site screening in private gynecological practices and community advertisements. Recruitment occurred between 2001-2005 in Providence, Rhode Island and between 2001-2009 in New Haven, Connecticut. Potential subjects provided consent for screening and assessment. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 16 | 17 | 16 |
Women With at Least 2 Follow up Visits | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Women Who Participated Full Follow up | 6 | 10 | 11 |
COMPLETED | 13 | 13 | 13 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 | 39 |
Age, Customized (participants) [Number] | ||||
25-29 years old |
1
7.7%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
15.4%
|
4
10.3%
|
30-39 years old |
11
84.6%
|
6
46.2%
|
7
53.8%
|
24
61.5%
|
40-45 years old |
1
7.7%
|
6
46.2%
|
4
30.8%
|
11
28.2%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
39
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | ||||
White |
8
61.5%
|
10
76.9%
|
10
76.9%
|
28
71.8%
|
Black |
1
7.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.6%
|
Hispanic |
1
7.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
5.1%
|
Other/Mixed |
2
15.4%
|
1
7.7%
|
1
7.7%
|
4
10.3%
|
Not collected |
1
7.7%
|
2
15.4%
|
1
7.7%
|
4
10.3%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
39
100%
|
Marital Status (participants) [Number] | ||||
Married |
7
53.8%
|
8
61.5%
|
9
69.2%
|
24
61.5%
|
Single/Divorced/Widowed |
5
38.5%
|
5
38.5%
|
4
30.8%
|
14
35.9%
|
Not collected |
1
7.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.6%
|
Number of pregnancies (participants) [Number] | ||||
0 pregnancies |
6
46.2%
|
3
23.1%
|
5
38.5%
|
14
35.9%
|
1 pregnancy |
3
23.1%
|
1
7.7%
|
0
0%
|
4
10.3%
|
2+ pregnancies |
4
30.8%
|
9
69.2%
|
8
61.5%
|
21
53.8%
|
Years with PMS (participants) [Number] | ||||
<4 years |
6
46.2%
|
2
15.4%
|
6
46.2%
|
14
35.9%
|
5-10 years |
3
23.1%
|
6
46.2%
|
1
7.7%
|
10
25.6%
|
>10 years |
3
23.1%
|
5
38.5%
|
6
46.2%
|
14
35.9%
|
Number of years not collected |
1
7.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.6%
|
Ever spoken to a doctor about PMS (participants) [Number] | ||||
Number [participants] |
4
30.8%
|
5
38.5%
|
6
46.2%
|
15
38.5%
|
OB-GYN asked about PMS (participants) [Number] | ||||
Number [participants] |
2
15.4%
|
5
38.5%
|
2
15.4%
|
9
23.1%
|
Thought about getting help for PMS (participants) [Number] | ||||
Number [participants] |
7
53.8%
|
7
53.8%
|
6
46.2%
|
20
51.3%
|
Concurrent oral contraceptive use (participants) [Number] | ||||
Number [participants] |
4
30.8%
|
3
23.1%
|
3
23.1%
|
10
25.6%
|
Baseline Symptom Scores (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C30) |
31.85
(9.14)
|
30.92
(7.62)
|
28.85
(9.97)
|
30.54
(5.17)
|
Premenstrual Tension Syndrome-Observer (PMTS-O) |
24.15
(5.40)
|
21.58
(3.73)
|
20.85
(6.62)
|
22.19
(3.11)
|
Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) |
2.16
(0.86)
|
1.12
(0.38)
|
1.29
(0.60)
|
1.52
(0.37)
|
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) |
4.92
(0.95)
|
4.46
(1.27)
|
4.15
(1.28)
|
4.51
(0.68)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Proportion of Participants With DRSP LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | DRSP: Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. LOCF: the last observation carried forward. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 12 | 12 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
0.80
6.2%
|
0.42
3.2%
|
0.42
3.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.15 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Participants With IDS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | IDS: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=least severe, 84=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
0.77
5.9%
|
0.31
2.4%
|
0.31
2.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Participants With PMTS LOCF Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | PMTS: Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). LOCF: last observation carried forward. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Response analysis includes all data from all subjects with the last observation carried forward to Visit 5. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 12 | 13 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
0.62
4.8%
|
0.33
2.5%
|
0.16
1.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.06 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Participants With DRSP Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5. However, Visit 5 DRSP calendars were missing for an additional 3 subjects in the fluoxetine group and for one subject in each of the calcium and placebo cells. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 5 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 5 | 8 | 6 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
1.00
7.7%
|
0.50
3.8%
|
0.33
2.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.09 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Patients With IDS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency, sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 8 | 11 | 12 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
1.00
7.7%
|
0.36
2.8%
|
0.33
2.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.005 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Patients With PMTS Visit-wise Response to Treatment (50% Improvement) |
---|---|
Description | Visit-wise response considers participants who remained in the study until Visit 5 and provided data for the visit. PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment from baseline to visit 5, including 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
For fluoxetine, calcium and placebo groups, 8, 11 and 12 participants remained in the trial until Visit 5. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 8 | 11 | 12 |
Number [proportion of participants] |
0.75
5.8%
|
0.36
2.8%
|
0.17
1.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.04 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Comparison of the Change in IDS Symptom Scores Among Groups |
---|---|
Description | IDS = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: measures depressive symptoms during the previous premenstrual phase with high internal consistency: sum of responses to 28 of 30 possible items each scored 0 to 3 points with total scoring (0=no symptoms, 84=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat cohort. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Visit 1 |
31.85
(9.14)
|
30.92
(7.62)
|
28.85
(9.97)
|
Visit 2 |
14.08
(9.53)
|
25.77
(7.74)
|
20.69
(12.20)
|
Visit 3 |
11.44
(7.94)
|
18.55
(10.40)
|
20.15
(14.25)
|
Visit 4 |
11.78
(8.50)
|
18.50
(9.01)
|
16.46
(11.00)
|
Visit 5 |
10.00
(6.41)
|
19.55
(9.04)
|
18.08
(9.17)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -2.63 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.51 to 0.24 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group IDS score as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.94 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.10 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.85 to 2.65 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in calcium group IDS scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 1.15 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.94 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.10 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Title | Comparison of the Change in PMTS Symptom Scores Among Groups |
---|---|
Description | PMTS = Premenstrual Tension Syndrome (Observer Rating) Scale: a clinician-administered retrospective scale developed for the study of PMS, a sum of responses to 10 items each with 4 points (0=no symptoms, 40=most severe). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat cohort. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Visit 1 |
24.15
(5.40)
|
21.58
(3.73)
|
20.85
(6.62)
|
Visit 2 |
11.15
(5.77)
|
18.54
(5.36)
|
16.00
(8.15)
|
Visit 3 |
10.33
(6.40)
|
13.36
(5.75)
|
16.38
(10.52)
|
Visit 4 |
12.11
(7.13)
|
12.83
(4.73)
|
12.77
(8.21)
|
Visit 5 |
10.13
(3.56)
|
11.91
(4.48)
|
14.58
(7.58)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.10 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -1.63 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.60 to 0.34 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group PMTS scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.40 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.81 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2.71 to 1.09 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in calcium group PMTS scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.10 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 1.06 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.40 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.37 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Title | Comparison of the Change in CGI-S Symptom Scores Among Groups |
---|---|
Description | CGI-S = Clinical Global Impression-Severity: a severity scale widely used in psychopharmacology research (1=normal not at all ill, 7=among most extremely ill). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat cohort. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Visit 1 |
4.92
(0.95)
|
4.46
(1.27)
|
4.15
(1.28)
|
Visit 2 |
2.54
(1.13)
|
4.23
(1.01)
|
3.38
(1.66)
|
Visit 3 |
2.33
(1.00)
|
3.00
(1.10)
|
3.38
(1.98)
|
Visit 4 |
2.56
(1.13)
|
2.73
(0.90)
|
2.92
(1.50)
|
Visit 5 |
2.50
(0.76)
|
2.91
(1.04)
|
3.17
(1.47)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.35 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.73 to 0.03 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group CGI-S scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.36 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.17 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.54 to 0.20 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in calcium group CGI-S scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.92 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.36 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.44 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Title | Comparison of the Change in DRSP Symptom Scores Among Groups |
---|---|
Description | DRSP = Daily Record of Severity of Problems, which combines responses to 21 items each with scale: 1=no symptoms, 6=extreme. This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat cohort. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Visit 1 |
2.16
(0.86)
|
1.12
(0.38)
|
1.29
(0.60)
|
Visit 2 |
0.97
(0.72)
|
0.76
(0.78)
|
0.93
(0.54)
|
Visit 3 |
0.27
(0.78)
|
0.61
(0.78)
|
1.19
(1.06)
|
Visit 4 |
0.72
(0.78)
|
0.51
(0.33)
|
0.59
(0.63)
|
Visit 5 |
0.44
(0.34)
|
0.75
(0.42)
|
0.74
(0.54)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.28 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.53 to -0.04 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group DRSP scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.58 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | 0.06 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.16 to 0.28 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in calcium group DRSP scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 2.08 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.58 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.18 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 1 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 1 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Title | Comparison of the Change in CGI Improvement Scores Among Groups |
---|---|
Description | CGI-I = Clinical Global Impression Improvement: the improvement subscale of CGI measuring change at each visit as compared to visit 1 (1=very much improved, 7=very much worse). This outcome is a measure of effect size between the two trial groups and the placebo group, with the placebo effect size value used as a reference. |
Time Frame | over duration of treatment, 4 menstrual cycles averaging 4 months after baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to treat cohort. |
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Visit 1 |
NA
(NA)
|
NA
(NA)
|
NA
(NA)
|
Visit 2 |
2.23
(0.83)
|
3.46
(0.78)
|
3.00
(1.35)
|
Visit 3 |
1.67
(0.87)
|
2.30
(0.82)
|
3.08
(1.50)
|
Visit 4 |
1.75
(1.16)
|
2.36
(1.03)
|
2.77
(1.17)
|
Visit 5 |
1.88
(0.64)
|
2.45
(0.82)
|
2.83
(1.19)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.04 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -1.03 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.70 to -0.35 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in fluoxetine group CGI Improvement scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.54 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Slope |
Estimated Value | -0.20 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.86 to 0.46 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Slope represents average change in calcium group CGI Improvement scores as compared to placebo |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | I: Fluoxetine, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.04 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.80 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the fluoxetine group between visits 2 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 2 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | II: Calcium, III: Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.54 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Cohen's d effect size |
Estimated Value | 0.32 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the difference between changes in the calcium group between visits 2 and 5 and changes in the placebo group between Visits 2 and 5, divided by the std dev in the placebo group at Visit 5 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From patient randomization to completion of study | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Final adverse event data were only available for the 32 patients randomized at the Yale site. There were no severe adverse events by self-report. Events were uncommon and occurred in all 3 groups with a numerically higher number in the calcium group. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo | |||
Arm/Group Description | Fluoxetine : Fluoxetine 20 mg per day for 4 menstrual cycles. | Calcium : 1200 mg of calcium to be taken for 4 menstrual cycles. | Placebo : For 4 cycles, women will receive placebo. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
I: Fluoxetine | II: Calcium | III: Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 4/10 (40%) | 8/11 (72.7%) | 2/11 (18.2%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal ache | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Burping | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Constipation | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Decreased appetite | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 |
Diarrhea | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Nausea | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 4/11 (36.4%) | 4 | 2/11 (18.2%) | 2 |
General disorders | ||||||
Feeling spacy | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 2/11 (18.2%) | 2 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Difficulty Concentrating | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Dizziness | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 2/11 (18.2%) | 2 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Dry mouth | 2/10 (20%) | 2 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Fatigue | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 |
Headache | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 3/11 (27.3%) | 3 | 2/11 (18.2%) | 2 |
Irritability | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 |
Sweating | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Vertigo | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||||
Cramps | 1/10 (10%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Decreased sex drive | 0/10 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Kimberly Yonkers |
---|---|
Organization | Donaghue Medical Research Foundation |
Phone | 1-203-764-6621 |
Kimberly.Yonkers@yale.edu |
- 0001011511
- NCT00683605