urodynaemics: Is Preoperative Urodynamics Essential for Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Sponsor
Alexandria University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04980196
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
7.3
8.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

urodynamic investigation when added in the diagnostic work-up of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction with POP is debatable.

This study was planned to determine the usefulness of preoperative urodynamic study in improving urological outcome following surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary tract dysfunction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: urodynaemic studies

Detailed Description

60 patients, fulfilled the selection criteria were counseled and informed about the trial protocol and a written consent according to declaration of Helsinki was signed. Participants were randomly assigned following simple randomization procedures (computerized random numbers) to group (1) or group (2). Each group consisted of 30 patients. All participants had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging. Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed. Only patients allocated for group 1 were subjected to urodynamic studies before surgical intervention and then corrective procedures for POP had been done .The Urodynamic studies carried out were : uroflowmetry and cystometry. The Uroflowmetry was performed by the gravimeter method, where maximum flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume and residual urine was measured. Maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/sec, and/or residual urine of more than 50 ml or 10% of voided volume in a bladder filled with a minimum of 150 ml was taken as cut off to detect abnormal voiding. Cystometric parameters which indicated normal bladder function were first desire to void between 150 and 200 ml, capacity (taken as strong desire to void) of greater than 400 ml, detrusor pressure rise on filling of less than 15 mm H2O per 500 ml infused, absence of detrusor contractions, no leakage on coughing, no significant pain on filling and finally a detrusor pressure rises on voiding (maximum voiding pressure) of less than 50 cm H2O, with a peak flow rate of more than 15 ml/s for a voided volume over 150 ml. Urodynamic stress incontinence was diagnosed when urethral leakage was seen with increased abdominal pressure, in the absence of detrusor contractions. Detrusor over activity was diagnosed when the patient has involuntary detrusor contractions during filling with or without leakage which may be spontaneous or provoked. All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post operatively.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Is Urodynamic Study an Essential Step in Preoperative Evaluation of Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse With Urinary Tract Dysfunction: Prospective Comparative Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 20, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
(1) URODYNAEMICS GROUP

30 patients allocated for group (1) had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging .Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed. And to urodynamic studies were performed before surgical intervention and then corrective procedures for POP had been done uroflowmetry and cystometry. All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post -operatively

Diagnostic Test: urodynaemic studies
The Urodynamic studies carried out were : uroflowmetry and cystometry. The Uroflowmetry was performed by the gravimetric method Detrusor over activity was diagnosed when the patient has involuntary detrusor contractions during filling with or without leakage which may be spontaneous or provoked,

(2)NON URODYNAMICS GROUP

30 patients allocated for group (2) had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging .Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed and then corrective procedures for POP had been done.All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post-- operatively

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. urological outcome following surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary tract dysfunction. [3months]

    persistence of urinary incontinence

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • pelvic organ prolapse associated with lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • are those who had previous surgery for urinary incontinence, or experienced neurological disorder such as multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injuries were not included. Or had complicated medical disease that made the patient unfit for anesthesia.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Shatby Maternity University Hospital Alexandria El-Khartoum Square Egypt 21131

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Alexandria University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mervat AM Elsersy, MD, Alexandria University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mervit Sersy, Assistant professor, Alexandria University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04980196
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 0304824
First Posted:
Jul 28, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Aug 6, 2021
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Mervit Sersy, Assistant professor, Alexandria University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 6, 2021