Two Points Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients

Sponsor
University of Alexandria (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02479425
Collaborator
(none)
150
2
14

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

The aim of this study is to comparative the impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:
  • Group 1: traditional three points rotation.

  • Group 2: two points rotation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: patient positioning
N/A

Detailed Description

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

Aim of the study:

The aim of this study was designed to evaluate the comparative impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

Patients:

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:
  • Group 1: traditional three points rotation.

  • Group 2: two points rotation.

Methods:
The studied patients were subjected to:

Complete history taking, physical examination, primary ICU diagnosis, routine laboratory investigation and recording Glasgaw coma scale (GCS), use of sedation, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation

Patients in group 1 nursed by traditional protocol [ two hours on the right side in 30 degree lateral position, two hours on the back and two hours on the left side in 30 degree lateral position] Patients in group 2 nursed in lateral position with 30 degree two hours on the right and two hours on the left with elevation of the head of bed by 30 degree in the two groups.

both groups were monitored for bed sores incidence, timing and sites of occurence

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
150 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Two Pints Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 3 point turning

patients nursed by the traditional re-positioning (two hours on back, two hours on right and two hours on left).

Procedure: patient positioning
positioning patients, every 2 hours, either to standard (right, back, left sides) or only to right and left sides

Experimental: 2 points turning

patients nursed on the right and left side sonly in 30ْ avoiding the back

Procedure: patient positioning
positioning patients, every 2 hours, either to standard (right, back, left sides) or only to right and left sides

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. pressure ulcer occurence [21 days]

    incidence

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
16 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients admitted to critical care medicine department and expected to have long stay
Exclusion Criteria:
  • active or healed bed sores

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Alexandria

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ahmed M El-Mehalawy, Ahmed M El-Mehalawy, MD, lecturer of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alexandria
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02479425
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Faculty of Medicine 09052011
First Posted:
Jun 24, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jul 8, 2015
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Ahmed M El-Mehalawy, Ahmed M El-Mehalawy, MD, lecturer of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alexandria
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 8, 2015