LS-HAPU: Optimal Patient Turning for Reducing Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers

Sponsor
Stanford University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02533726
Collaborator
Leaf Healthcare, Inc. (Industry)
1,312
1
2
6
217

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether optimal patient turning, strictly every 2 hours with at least 15 minutes of tissue decompression, reduces the occurrence of hospital acquired pressure ulcers.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Optimal Turning
  • Other: Standard Care Practices
  • Other: Patient Sensor
N/A

Detailed Description

This single site, open label, two arm randomized control trial aims to evaluate whether optimal patient turning, strictly every 2 hours with at least 15 minutes of tissue decompression, reduces the occurrence of hospital acquired pressure ulcers. Optimal turning procedures will be obtained with the use of a patient monitoring system (Leaf Healthcare, Inc.) and compared to standard preventative care practices.

Sensors were placed on all participants as they were admitted to ICU. A nurse's user dashboard was turned on for participants in the Optimal Turning Group, but was not turned on for participants in the Standard Care group.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1312 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Randomized Control Trial Evaluating Optimal Patient Turning Procedures for Reducing Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Treatment - Optimal Turning

All patients will have a sensor applied. Patients within this arm will receive care from nurses who have access to a User Dashboard that provides visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from a wearable patient sensor (Leaf Healthcare, Inc.).

Other: Optimal Turning
Patients within this arm will receive optimal turning practices. Nurses caring for these patients will receive real-time quantitative measures of patient turning procedures from the User Dashboard and provide a visual advisory to the nurse for the time to next turn.
Other Names:
  • Patient Turning
  • Pressure Ulcer Prevention
  • Other: Patient Sensor
    A small sensor with adhesive backing is applied to the upper chest (midline) of the patient. Sensor tracks and records body movement and position, and displays this on a User Dashboard located on a computer at the bedside.
    Other Names:
  • Leaf Healthcare Patient Monitoring Sensor
  • Active Comparator: Control - Standard Care

    All patients will have a sensor applied. Patients within this arm will receive care from nurses who DO NOT have access to a User Dashboard that provides visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients will receive standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary.

    Other: Standard Care Practices
    Patients within this arm will receive standard preventative care practices - that is, nurses will provide standard care as necessary, without the aid of visual advisories from a patient sensor.

    Other: Patient Sensor
    A small sensor with adhesive backing is applied to the upper chest (midline) of the patient. Sensor tracks and records body movement and position, and displays this on a User Dashboard located on a computer at the bedside.
    Other Names:
  • Leaf Healthcare Patient Monitoring Sensor
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Count of Participants With Pressure Ulcer According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Criteria for Pressure Ulcers [Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)]

      NPUAP criteria include 4 stages and 2 unstaged criteria. The count of patients with pressure ulcer according to any of the criteria are reported. Stage 1: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Stage 2: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Stage 3: Full-thickness skin loss Stage 4: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss Suspected deep tissue injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Compliance With Patient Turning Procedures [Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)]

      Compliance is reported as the percentage of time during ICU admission that patients received turning every two hours.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adults (>18 years of age)

    • Admission to Intensive Care Unit

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Children (<18 years of age)

    • Adhesive allergy

    • Physical limitation for sensor application

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Stanford Health Care Stanford California United States 94304

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Stanford University
    • Leaf Healthcare, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: David Pickham, PhD, Stanford Health Care

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    David Pickham, Clinical Assistant Professor, Stanford University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02533726
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 33144
    First Posted:
    Aug 27, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by David Pickham, Clinical Assistant Professor, Stanford University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Arm/Group Description All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary.
    Period Title: Initial Allocation
    STARTED 659 653
    COMPLETED 659 653
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: Initial Allocation
    STARTED 709 603
    Per Protocol Population 671 555
    COMPLETED 709 603
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care Total
    Arm/Group Description All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 671 555 1226
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    60
    (17)
    60
    (18)
    60
    (17)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    298
    44.4%
    253
    45.6%
    551
    44.9%
    Male
    373
    55.6%
    302
    54.4%
    675
    55.1%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    113
    16.8%
    82
    14.8%
    195
    15.9%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    538
    80.2%
    458
    82.5%
    996
    81.2%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    20
    3%
    15
    2.7%
    35
    2.9%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Count of Participants With Pressure Ulcer According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Criteria for Pressure Ulcers
    Description NPUAP criteria include 4 stages and 2 unstaged criteria. The count of patients with pressure ulcer according to any of the criteria are reported. Stage 1: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Stage 2: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Stage 3: Full-thickness skin loss Stage 4: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss Suspected deep tissue injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration
    Time Frame Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per protocol population according to treatment received (met minimum monitoring period (>2h) and did not receive both interventions)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Arm/Group Description All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary.
    Measure Participants 671 555
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    5
    0.7%
    15
    2.7%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment - Optimal Turning, Control - Standard Care
    Comments Per-protocol (PP) analysis, consistent with regulatory guidance (FDA).
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .012
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value .27
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    .1 to .75
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment - Optimal Turning, Control - Standard Care
    Comments Per protocol analysis adjusted for admitting team, unit of admission, and risk for pressure injury.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.015
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.20
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.06 to 0.74
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Compliance With Patient Turning Procedures
    Description Compliance is reported as the percentage of time during ICU admission that patients received turning every two hours.
    Time Frame Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per protocol population according to treatment received (met minimum monitoring period (>2h) and did not receive both interventions)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Arm/Group Description All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary.
    Measure Participants 671 555
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of time]
    67
    (19.5)
    54
    (22.3)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Adverse events are reported according to treatment received
    Arm/Group Title Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Arm/Group Description All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary.
    All Cause Mortality
    Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/709 (0%) 0/603 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Treatment - Optimal Turning Control - Standard Care
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/709 (0%) 0/603 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr David Pickham
    Organization Stanford University School of Medicine
    Phone 650 701 6830
    Email dpickham@stanford.edu
    Responsible Party:
    David Pickham, Clinical Assistant Professor, Stanford University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02533726
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 33144
    First Posted:
    Aug 27, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017