The Effect of Sponge Versus No-Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02016898
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
2
34.6
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary focus of this study is to assess intraocular pressure and complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus no-sponge.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effect of Sponge Versus No-Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 17, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 17, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Sponge placement of Mitomycin-C

Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery.

Procedure: Placement of the sponge

Drug: Mitomycin-C

Experimental: Irrigation placement of Mitomycin-C

Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery.

Drug: Mitomycin-C

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Complication Rates [post-operative day 1 to month 6]

    To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Intraocular Pressure [post-operative day 1 to month 6]

    To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Men or women aged 18 years and older at screening.

  2. Diagnosis of chronic angle-closure glaucoma or open-angle glaucoma, phakic or pseudophakic, with visual field or optic disc changes characteristic of glaucoma.

  3. Suitable candidate for trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with MMC in the superonasal quadrant in the study eye which the physician deems as medically necessary.

  4. Capable and willing to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Unable or unwilling to provide consent

  2. Any previous ocular surgeries in the study eye preventing placement of the trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with mitomycin-C in the superonasal quadrant

  3. Any previous glaucoma drainage devices in the study eye

  4. Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect applanation tonometry.

  5. Presence or history of any abnormality or disorder that could interfere with the study procedure or prevent the successful completion of the study.

  6. Presence or history of uveitis within 10 years or any other ocular infection or inflammation within 14 days before day 1.

  7. Any significant unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, hematologic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease.

  8. Known Pregnancy or Breastfeeding

Physical and Laboratory Findings

  1. Conjunctival scarring precluding a superonasal implantation location.

  2. Vitreous in the anterior chamber.

  3. Abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in the study eye.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina United States 27705

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Duke University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leon Herndon, MD, Duke Health

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02016898
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00048136
First Posted:
Dec 20, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Feb 9, 2018
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Duke University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail Two subjects were retroactively removed due to not satisfying the inclusion/exclusion criteria. An additional three subjects had uncertain group allocation due to clerical errors.
Arm/Group Title Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Arm/Group Description Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 50 45
COMPLETED 45 40
NOT COMPLETED 5 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C Total
Arm/Group Description Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 50 45 95
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
68
(9.6)
73.1
(8.3)
70.4
(9.3)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
30
60%
23
51.1%
53
55.8%
Male
20
40%
22
48.9%
42
44.2%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Asian
0
0%
3
6.7%
3
3.2%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
1
2.2%
1
1.1%
Black or African American
26
52%
16
35.6%
42
44.2%
White
23
46%
23
51.1%
46
48.4%
More than one race
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
2%
2
4.4%
3
3.2%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
50
100%
45
100%
95
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Complication Rates
Description To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation
Time Frame post-operative day 1 to month 6

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of MMC
Arm/Group Description Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C
Measure Participants 50 45
Count of Participants [Participants]
29
58%
28
62.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C, Irrigation Placement of MMC
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 0.93
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.67 to 1.29
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Intraocular Pressure
Description To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation
Time Frame post-operative day 1 to month 6

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Five participants in each group were not included due to being lost to follow-up or deceased.
Arm/Group Title Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of MMC
Arm/Group Description Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C
Measure Participants 45 40
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg (millimeters of mercury)]
-8.4
(1.6)
-8.2
(1.2)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C, Irrigation Placement of MMC
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.539
Comments
Method t-test, 1 sided
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 0.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 2.01
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 6 months
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Arm/Group Description Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C
All Cause Mortality
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/50 (2%) 1/45 (2.2%)
Serious Adverse Events
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/50 (0%) 0/45 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 29/50 (58%) 28/45 (62.2%)
Eye disorders
Cystic blebs 8/50 (16%) 5/45 (11.1%)
Shallowing of anterior chamber 1/50 (2%) 3/45 (6.7%)
Hypotony 5/50 (10%) 14/45 (31.1%)
Choroidal effusion 3/50 (6%) 3/45 (6.7%)
Suprachoroidal hemorrhage 0/50 (0%) 1/45 (2.2%)
Hyphema 1/50 (2%) 1/45 (2.2%)
Wound leak 18/50 (36%) 14/45 (31.1%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Michael Quist, MD
Organization Duke University Health System
Phone 718-490-7657
Email michael.quist@duke.edu
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02016898
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00048136
First Posted:
Dec 20, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Feb 9, 2018
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2018