The Effect of Sponge Versus No-Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary focus of this study is to assess intraocular pressure and complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus no-sponge.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sponge placement of Mitomycin-C Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. |
Procedure: Placement of the sponge
Drug: Mitomycin-C
|
Experimental: Irrigation placement of Mitomycin-C Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. |
Drug: Mitomycin-C
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Complication Rates [post-operative day 1 to month 6]
To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Intraocular Pressure [post-operative day 1 to month 6]
To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Men or women aged 18 years and older at screening.
-
Diagnosis of chronic angle-closure glaucoma or open-angle glaucoma, phakic or pseudophakic, with visual field or optic disc changes characteristic of glaucoma.
-
Suitable candidate for trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with MMC in the superonasal quadrant in the study eye which the physician deems as medically necessary.
-
Capable and willing to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unable or unwilling to provide consent
-
Any previous ocular surgeries in the study eye preventing placement of the trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with mitomycin-C in the superonasal quadrant
-
Any previous glaucoma drainage devices in the study eye
-
Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect applanation tonometry.
-
Presence or history of any abnormality or disorder that could interfere with the study procedure or prevent the successful completion of the study.
-
Presence or history of uveitis within 10 years or any other ocular infection or inflammation within 14 days before day 1.
-
Any significant unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, hematologic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease.
-
Known Pregnancy or Breastfeeding
Physical and Laboratory Findings
-
Conjunctival scarring precluding a superonasal implantation location.
-
Vitreous in the anterior chamber.
-
Abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in the study eye.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | United States | 27705 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Duke University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Leon Herndon, MD, Duke Health
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Pro00048136
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Two subjects were retroactively removed due to not satisfying the inclusion/exclusion criteria. An additional three subjects had uncertain group allocation due to clerical errors. |
Arm/Group Title | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 50 | 45 |
COMPLETED | 45 | 40 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C | Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 50 | 45 | 95 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
68
(9.6)
|
73.1
(8.3)
|
70.4
(9.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
30
60%
|
23
51.1%
|
53
55.8%
|
Male |
20
40%
|
22
48.9%
|
42
44.2%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
3
6.7%
|
3
3.2%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
1
2.2%
|
1
1.1%
|
Black or African American |
26
52%
|
16
35.6%
|
42
44.2%
|
White |
23
46%
|
23
51.1%
|
46
48.4%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
2%
|
2
4.4%
|
3
3.2%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
50
100%
|
45
100%
|
95
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Complication Rates |
---|---|
Description | To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation |
Time Frame | post-operative day 1 to month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of MMC |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C | Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C |
Measure Participants | 50 | 45 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
29
58%
|
28
62.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C, Irrigation Placement of MMC |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Ratio (RR) |
Estimated Value | 0.93 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.67 to 1.29 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Intraocular Pressure |
---|---|
Description | To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation |
Time Frame | post-operative day 1 to month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Five participants in each group were not included due to being lost to follow-up or deceased. |
Arm/Group Title | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of MMC |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C | Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C |
Measure Participants | 45 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg (millimeters of mercury)] |
-8.4
(1.6)
|
-8.2
(1.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C, Irrigation Placement of MMC |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.539 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 0.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Deviation Value: 2.01 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C | ||
Arm/Group Description | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C | Randomization stratified by age (age ≥65 or age < 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP < 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/50 (2%) | 1/45 (2.2%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/50 (0%) | 0/45 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C | Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 29/50 (58%) | 28/45 (62.2%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Cystic blebs | 8/50 (16%) | 5/45 (11.1%) | ||
Shallowing of anterior chamber | 1/50 (2%) | 3/45 (6.7%) | ||
Hypotony | 5/50 (10%) | 14/45 (31.1%) | ||
Choroidal effusion | 3/50 (6%) | 3/45 (6.7%) | ||
Suprachoroidal hemorrhage | 0/50 (0%) | 1/45 (2.2%) | ||
Hyphema | 1/50 (2%) | 1/45 (2.2%) | ||
Wound leak | 18/50 (36%) | 14/45 (31.1%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Michael Quist, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Duke University Health System |
Phone | 718-490-7657 |
michael.quist@duke.edu |
- Pro00048136