Evaluation of the Impact of the PRONEtect Education Hub vs. Classic Lecture, on the Competencies of Nursing Students

Sponsor
University Ghent (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05575869
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
2.9
28

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the impact of online educational material versus a classic lecture on the confidence levels, knowledge and knowledge application of final-year nursing students.

Participants will be asked to complete a baseline self-efficacy evaluation and a baseline knowledge test which were validated by the 11-member international expert panel previously established.

After randomization, the control group will be asked to attend a classic 1-hour lecture at the nursing school about the topic of prone positioning and skin/tissue damage prevention.

The experimental group will get access to the PRONEtect educational website containing short simulation videos and other learning materials.

Three weeks later the participants will be asked to complete the self-efficacy evaluation and knowledge assessment again, additionally a knowledge application assessment.

All the questionnaires will be administered via Qualtrics.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: (online) PRONEtect educational material
  • Other: Classic (normal) one hour lesson/lecture
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The lecturers at the nursing schools (x2) will have no access to the results of the surveys. A study number is assigned to the students and with the study number they enter their answers to the questionnaires
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Evaluate the Impact of Online Educational Material (PRONEtect Educational Hub) on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Confidence Levels, and Application of Knowledge Regarding Skin Protection of the Prone Ventilated Patient - a Randomised Controlled Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 27, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 23, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 23, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group: Access to online PRONEtect educational material

A website with educational material (simulation video, protocol, checklist).

Other: (online) PRONEtect educational material
This is a website containing educational material like short simulation videos on how to turn a patient from supine-to-prone and prone-to-supine positioning, how to protect the skin from incontinence, or before securing endotracheal-/nasogastric tubes, how to reposition the patient to prevent pressure injuries, a full protocol regarding prone positioning etc.

Active Comparator: Control group: Classic one-hour lecture

Didactive presentation by the usual nursing school lecturer.

Other: Classic (normal) one hour lesson/lecture
As per normal, a classroom lecture given by the nursing school by one of the nursing school lecturers.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Knowledge assessment (test score) [3 weeks]

    A total sample size of 78 participants (39 in each group, 1:1 allocation ratio) to have at least 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online package (experimental group) compared to the classical lecture (control group) with respect to the mean change from baseline in knowledge at week 3 at the one-sided 1.25% significance level, when the non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point and when we assume a common standard deviation in both groups of 2.5 points, a true difference between the groups of 1 point in favor of the online package, and a drop-out rate of 20%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Confidence levels (survey scores) [3 weeks]

    A total sample size of 78 participants (39 in each group, 1:1 allocation ratio) to have at least 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online package (experimental group) compared to the classical lecture (control group) with respect to the mean change from baseline in knowledge at week 3 at the one-sided 1.25% significance level, when the non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point and when we assume a common standard deviation in both groups of 2.5 points, a true difference between the groups of 1 point in favor of the online package, and a drop-out rate of 20%.

  2. Difference between the "Knowledge application" (test score) between the groups [3 weeks]

    Difference between the "Knowledge application" (test score) of 1-2 points between the groups

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Final year nursing students studying towards their Bachelor in Nursing degree

  • Chosen topics of critical care nursing as supplementary subject or critical care subjects as part of their course or complex wound management as part of their course.

Exclusion Criteria:

Nursing students who are not yet in their final year of studies.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ghent University Ghent Belgium 9000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Ghent

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05575869
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PRONEtection #2
First Posted:
Oct 12, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jan 30, 2023
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 30, 2023