Comparing the Effectiveness of Various Interventions on Improving Lumbar Proprioception

Sponsor
Black Hills State University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04712695
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
4
9.2
8.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

University students ages 18-45, with no recent history of back injury and no history of back surgery, were recruited. Participants completed proprioception testing consisting of a standing side bending and seated spinal flexion test. Participants performed each test once, then were blindfolded and asked to replicate the tests 10 times. After the initial proprioceptive testing, the participants were randomly split into four groups and performed a 10-minute intervention exercise, before repeating the proprioceptive tests for final measurements. The four groups included: graded motor imagery, mirror visual feedback, augmented biofeedback, and diaphragmatic breathing. Participants also completed a Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale to rate their enjoyment of their intervention task

-For the seated forward flexion test, the participants' C7 and S2 vertebrae were identified and used as markers. The participants were asked to bend forward until the tape measure increased 5 cm from the original distance between the C7 and S2 vertebrae. Similar to the seated flexion test, during the side-bending task, the participants were asked to side bend until the tip of their middle finger was 10 cm closer to the floor. The participants were asked to memorize that point in their mind; they were then blindfolded and asked to repeat the movement 10 times, trying to recreate the original position to the best of their ability.

Between initial and final measurements of proprioception, the participants were randomly assigned to one of the following four groups for interventions for a 10-minute training session:

  • Graded Motor Imagery Group: Participants were shown several flashcards with pictures of individuals' back oriented to either the flexed or side bent position. The participants stated which direction the image depicted and visualized themselves making the movement identified in the picture.

  • Mirror Visual Feedback Group:

Participants viewed themselves in a mirror while performing flexion and side bending movements.

-Augmented Biofeedback Group: Participants used an augmented musculoskeletal feedback system smartphone application app and small sensors with Bluetooth technology to translate the movement of the participant into an avatar on the game.

-Diaphragmatic Breathing Group: Participants were told to sit on a chair with their back straight and feet flat on the floor with one hand on their chest and one hand on their stomach. They performed diaphragmatic breathing in a slow 4 second box method: breathing in for 4 seconds, holding for 4 seconds, breathing out for 4 seconds, and then hold for 4 seconds

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Exercise Based Interventions
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparing the Effectiveness of Various Interventions on Improving Lumbar Proprioception
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 3, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 10, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 10, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Graded Motor Imagery Group

Other: Exercise Based Interventions
Proprioception Training Interventions

Experimental: Mirror Visual Feedback Group

Other: Exercise Based Interventions
Proprioception Training Interventions

Experimental: Augmented Biofeedback Group

Other: Exercise Based Interventions
Proprioception Training Interventions

Sham Comparator: Diaphragmatic Breathing Group

Other: Exercise Based Interventions
Proprioception Training Interventions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Proprioception [Day 1]

    Change in lumbar proprioception as assessed through the seated forward flexion test measured in cm following a single training session.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Healthy university students ages 18-35

  • Must be able to perform low intensity exercise

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Past medical history of back surgery

  • Back pain within the past 6 months

  • Musculoskeletal injury within the past 6 months

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Black Hills State University Spearfish South Dakota United States 57783-9575

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Black Hills State University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Craig Triplett, Associate Professor Exercise Science, Black Hills State University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04712695
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BlackHillsSU
First Posted:
Jan 15, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jan 19, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 19, 2021