Prospective Observational Study to Describe Characteristics and Management of Patients Treated With Denosumab (Prolia®) in Routine Clinical Practice
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this prospective, observational study in Czech Republic and Slovakia is to describe per country the characteristics of women treated with denosumab in routine clinical practice and the clinical management of these patients during the first 2 years of treatment. In addition, the study aims to collect safety data in the real-life clinical practice settings on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Denosumab Patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. |
Biological: Denosumab
This is an non-interventional study, therefore denosumab is administered as part of routine care and not for purposes of the study.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician's Office [24 months]
Number of participants who received all injection(s), including baseline injection, from the initial prescribing site irrespective of total number of injections received on study.
- Number of Participants Receiving an Individual Prescription and Injection of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician Office by Each Individual Injection [Baseline (day 1), and at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)]
- Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab [Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively)]
Number of participants receiving all prescriptions and injections of denosumab whether or not the injections are given at the initial prescribing physician's office.
- Number of Participants With a Referral by the Prescribing Physician to Other Health Care Providers for Continuation or Follow-up of Care [24 months]
- Types of Health Care Providers Administering an Individual Injection of Denosumab at the Baseline Injection [Baseline (day 1)]
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the baseline injection.
- Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the First Post-baseline Injection [Month 6]
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the first post-baseline injection.
- Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Second Post-baseline Injection [Month 12]
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the second post-baseline injection.
- Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Third Post-baseline Injection [Month 18]
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the third post-baseline injection.
- Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Fourth Post-baseline Injection [Month 24]
Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the fourth post-baseline injection.
- Number of Denosumab Post-baseline Injections Received by Each Participant [24 months]
- Number of Participants Having Radiologic Bone Assessments [Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and during the study (post-baseline)]
Number of participants having radiologic bone assessments pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study.
- Number of Participants Having Osteoporosis Related Laboratory Examinations [Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and post-baseline]
Number of participants having osteoporosis related laboratory examinations pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study. Participants may not have been given denosumab injection when they attended each visit.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) to Denosumab [24 months]
Adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to denosumab as evaluated by the investigator were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
- Number of Participants With Serious ADRs to Denosumab [24 months]
Serious adverse events that were considered related to denosumab were classified as serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs). A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that also: • is fatal • is life threatening (places the patient at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • is an "other significant medical hazard" that does not meet any of the above criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
-
Women with a clinical diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis
-
Decision has been made to treat with denosumab 60 mg once every 6 months
-
Have received their first injection of denosumab within 8 weeks prior to enrolling in this study.
-
Appropriate written informed consent has been obtained (as required per local country regulations)
Exclusion Criteria
-
Participating in ongoing or have participated in previous denosumab clinical trials
-
Participation in other clinical or device trials in the last 6 months
-
Contra-indicated for treatment with Prolia® according to the approved applicable local product label.
-
Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Research Site | Brno | Czechia | 602 00 | |
2 | Research Site | Brno | Czechia | 638 00 | |
3 | Research Site | Ceske Budejovice | Czechia | 370 01 | |
4 | Research Site | Havlickuv Brod | Czechia | 580 22 | |
5 | Research Site | Karlovy Vary | Czechia | 367 17 | |
6 | Research Site | Kutna Hora | Czechia | 284 01 | |
7 | Research Site | Ostrava-Trebovice | Czechia | 722 00 | |
8 | Research Site | Ostrava | Czechia | 702 00 | |
9 | Research Site | Plzen | Czechia | 323 00 | |
10 | Research Site | Praha 11 | Czechia | 148 00 | |
11 | Research Site | Praha 2 | Czechia | 128 50 | |
12 | Research Site | Praha 4 - Nusle | Czechia | 140 00 | |
13 | Research Site | Trutnov | Czechia | 541 21 | |
14 | Research Site | Vsetin | Czechia | 755 01 | |
15 | Research Site | Zlin | Czechia | 760 01 | |
16 | Osteocentrum Zlin | Zlin | Czechia | ||
17 | Research Site | Banska Bystrica | Slovakia | 974 01 | |
18 | Research Site | Bratislava | Slovakia | 826 06 | |
19 | Research Site | Bratislava | Slovakia | 833 05 | |
20 | Research Site | Humenne | Slovakia | 066 01 | |
21 | Research Site | Kosice-Saca | Slovakia | 040 15 | |
22 | Research Site | Kosice | Slovakia | 040 01 | |
23 | Research Site | Lubochna | Slovakia | 034 91 | |
24 | Research Site | Lucenec | Slovakia | 984 01 | |
25 | Research Site | Martin | Slovakia | 036 01 | |
26 | Research Site | Nitra | Slovakia | 949 01 | |
27 | Research Site | Presov | Slovakia | 080 01 | |
28 | Research Site | Trnava | Slovakia | 917 75 | |
29 | Research Site | Zilina | Slovakia | 010 01 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Amgen
- One Amgen Center Drive
- THOUSAND OAKS
- CA
- 91320-1799
- USA
Investigators
- Study Director: MD, Amgen
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- 20110132
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | The study was conducted at various study centers in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The recruitment period was from 26 June 2012 to 15 May 2013. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 300 | 300 |
COMPLETED | 265 | 279 |
NOT COMPLETED | 35 | 21 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 300 | 300 | 600 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
69.0
(8.7)
|
64.3
(8.6)
|
66.7
(9.0)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
300
100%
|
300
100%
|
600
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age at Menopause (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
48.3
(5.6)
|
48.3
(5.2)
|
48.3
(5.4)
|
Time Since Postmenopausal Osteoarthritis Diagnosis (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
5.3
(5.2)
|
3.0
(4.1)
|
4.1
(4.8)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician's Office |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants who received all injection(s), including baseline injection, from the initial prescribing site irrespective of total number of injections received on study. |
Time Frame | 24 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (all enrolled patients who provided informed consent and received at least one injection) |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
Number [participants] |
295
98.3%
|
296
98.7%
|
Title | Number of Participants Receiving an Individual Prescription and Injection of Denosumab From the Initial Prescribing Physician Office by Each Individual Injection |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline (day 1), and at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set; n = the number of participants who received the corresponding injection |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
Baseline injection (n = 300, 300) |
300
100%
|
298
99.3%
|
First post-baseline injection (n = 283, 293) |
282
94%
|
291
97%
|
Second post-baseline injection (n = 276, 283) |
275
91.7%
|
282
94%
|
Third post-baseline injection (n = 262, 276) |
260
86.7%
|
274
91.3%
|
Fourth post-baseline injection (n = 246, 243) |
245
81.7%
|
240
80%
|
Title | Number of Participants Receiving All Prescriptions and Injections of Denosumab |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants receiving all prescriptions and injections of denosumab whether or not the injections are given at the initial prescribing physician's office. |
Time Frame | Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (corresponding to the first, second, third and fourth post-baseline injections respectively) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
First post-baseline injection |
283
94.3%
|
293
97.7%
|
Second post-baseline injection |
276
92%
|
283
94.3%
|
Third post-baseline injection |
262
87.3%
|
276
92%
|
Fourth post-baseline injection |
246
82%
|
243
81%
|
Title | Number of Participants With a Referral by the Prescribing Physician to Other Health Care Providers for Continuation or Follow-up of Care |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 24 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set participants who discontinued the study prematurely |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 35 | 21 |
Referred to other health care providers (total) |
0
0%
|
2
0.7%
|
Referred to rheumatologist |
0
0%
|
2
0.7%
|
Title | Types of Health Care Providers Administering an Individual Injection of Denosumab at the Baseline Injection |
---|---|
Description | Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the baseline injection. |
Time Frame | Baseline (day 1) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
Prescribing Physician |
54
18%
|
84
28%
|
Other Physician |
19
6.3%
|
21
7%
|
Nurse |
227
75.7%
|
195
65%
|
Title | Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the First Post-baseline Injection |
---|---|
Description | Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the first post-baseline injection. |
Time Frame | Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set participants who received a first post-baseline injection (i.e. at month 6) |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 283 | 293 |
Prescribing Physician |
70
23.3%
|
109
36.3%
|
Other Physician |
8
2.7%
|
0
0%
|
Nurse |
205
68.3%
|
184
61.3%
|
Title | Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Second Post-baseline Injection |
---|---|
Description | Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the second post-baseline injection. |
Time Frame | Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set participants who received a second post-baseline injection (i.e. at month 12) |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 276 | 283 |
Prescribing Physician |
75
25%
|
104
34.7%
|
Other Physician |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Nurse |
201
67%
|
179
59.7%
|
Title | Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Third Post-baseline Injection |
---|---|
Description | Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the third post-baseline injection. |
Time Frame | Month 18 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set participants who received a third post-baseline injection (i.e. at month 18) |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 262 | 276 |
Prescribing Physician |
69
23%
|
113
37.7%
|
Other Physician |
4
1.3%
|
1
0.3%
|
Nurse |
189
63%
|
162
54%
|
Title | Types of Health Care Providers Administering Denosumab at the Fourth Post-baseline Injection |
---|---|
Description | Types of health care providers administering an individual injection of denosumab inside or outside the initial prescribing office at the fourth post-baseline injection. |
Time Frame | Month 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set participants who received a fourth post-baseline injection (i.e. at month 24) |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 246 | 243 |
Prescribing Physician |
76
25.3%
|
93
31%
|
Other Physician |
0
0%
|
6
2%
|
Nurse |
170
56.7%
|
144
48%
|
Title | Number of Denosumab Post-baseline Injections Received by Each Participant |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 24 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
No post-baseline injections |
17
5.7%
|
7
2.3%
|
One post-baseline injection |
7
2.3%
|
10
3.3%
|
Two post-baseline injections |
14
4.7%
|
7
2.3%
|
Three post-baseline injections |
16
5.3%
|
33
11%
|
Four post-baseline injections |
246
82%
|
243
81%
|
Title | Number of Participants Having Radiologic Bone Assessments |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants having radiologic bone assessments pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study. |
Time Frame | Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and during the study (post-baseline) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
Pre-baseline |
297
99%
|
299
99.7%
|
Post-baseline |
253
84.3%
|
216
72%
|
Title | Number of Participants Having Osteoporosis Related Laboratory Examinations |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants having osteoporosis related laboratory examinations pre-treatment with denosumab and during the study. Participants may not have been given denosumab injection when they attended each visit. |
Time Frame | Pre-baseline (before first denosumab injection) and post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set; n = participants with visits at each time point. |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
Baseline injection (n = 300, 300) |
230
76.7%
|
260
86.7%
|
First post-baseline injection (n = 285, 294) |
148
49.3%
|
207
69%
|
Second post-baseline injection (n = 280, 286) |
162
54%
|
224
74.7%
|
Third post-baseline injection (n = 270, 280) |
163
54.3%
|
226
75.3%
|
Fourth post-baseline injection (n = 262, 263) |
174
58%
|
223
74.3%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) to Denosumab |
---|---|
Description | Adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to denosumab as evaluated by the investigator were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs). |
Time Frame | 24 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
All adverse drug reactions |
4
1.3%
|
12
4%
|
ADRs leading to discontinuation of denosumab |
2
0.7%
|
5
1.7%
|
Fatal adverse drug reactions |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Serious ADRs to Denosumab |
---|---|
Description | Serious adverse events that were considered related to denosumab were classified as serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs). A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that also: • is fatal • is life threatening (places the patient at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • is an "other significant medical hazard" that does not meet any of the above criteria. |
Time Frame | 24 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. |
Measure Participants | 300 | 300 |
All serious adverse drug reactions |
0
0%
|
1
0.3%
|
SADRs leading to discontinuation of denosumab |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Fatal serious ADRs |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 24 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions that exceed the indicated frequency threshold. Serious Adverse Events summarizes serious adverse drug reactions which are defined as serious adverse events that are considered related to denosumab. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Czech Republic | Slovakia | ||
Arm/Group Description | Patients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | Patients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Czech Republic | Slovakia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Czech Republic | Slovakia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/300 (0%) | 1/300 (0.3%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Myocardial infarction | 0/300 (0%) | 1/300 (0.3%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Czech Republic | Slovakia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/300 (0%) | 0/300 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Study Director |
---|---|
Organization | Amgen Inc. |
Phone | 866-572-6436 |
- 20110132