Prospective Study of Veteran Health in Previously Deployed Soldiers
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: Previous deployments like that to the Persian Gulf in 1991 produced veterans with post-deployment symptom-based health problems with no medical explanation. This was termed Gulf War illness or medically unexplained illness (MUI). If previous wars are any indication, some soldiers currently deployed to hostile areas also will return home with unexplained symptom-based illnesses. However, when this study began there was virtually no pre-war, prospective data on risk and resilience factors associated with MUI. This study is attempting to fill that gap.
Objectives: Our goals are to: (a) determine pre- and immediate post-deployment factors predicting later MUI and poor functional status, (b) improve previous methodological problems (e.g., selection bias, recall bias and lack of baseline controls) in studies of MUI, and (c) relate pre-deployment risk factors (e.g., personality, stressor reactivity) and resilience factors (e.g., coping style, social support) to post-deployment functional status.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Background: Previous deployments like that to the Persian Gulf in 1991 produced veterans with post-deployment symptom-based health problems with no medical explanation. This was termed Gulf War illness or medically unexplained illness (MUI). If previous wars are any indication, some soldiers currently deployed to hostile areas also will return home with unexplained symptom-based illnesses. However, was virtually no pre-war, prospective data on risk and resilience factors associated with MUI before 2001. This study will attempt to fill that gap. Objectives: Our goals are to: (a) determine pre- and immediate post-deployment factors predicting later MUI and poor functional status, (b) improve previous methodological problems (e.g., selection bias, recall bias and lack of baseline controls) in studies of MUI, and (c) relate pre-deployment risk factors (e.g., personality, stressor reactivity) and resilience factors (e.g., coping style, social support) to post-deployment functional status. Methods: This study uses a prospective, longitudinal observational design to assess risk and resilience factors for post-war MUI in Reserve and National Guard enlisted personnel. A stratified random sample of more than 700 subjects will be drawn from those undergoing pre- and post-mobilization readiness processing at Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS. Personnel will be tested pre-mobilization (Phase 1), immediately after mobilization (Phase 2) and at 3 months and 1 year post-deployment (Phases 3 & 4). Predictor variables include personality, social support, coping style, non-specific symptoms, sympathetic cardiac stress reactivity, and cortisol stress reactivity. Control variables include prior traumatic events, current distress, PTSD symptoms, socially desirable responding, body mass index, deployment experiences, environmental exposures and demographics (e.g., age, gender). Outcome variables include functional status, healthcare utilization, and MUI status (using CDC criteria for chronic multisymptom illness developed after the first Gulf War). Status: Publications and presentations are being prepared. Impact: The larger, prospective study with soldiers will help us to identify pre- and early post-deployment risk and resilience factors important in MUI, functional status, and healthcare utilization. There is an urgent need for both pre- and post-deployment predictors of later MUI uncontaminated by recall bias, and the selection bias of studying only treatment-seekers. If we are to understand how to best treat veterans presenting with unexplained symptoms, then we need to know which pre-war factors are most useful in predicting who is most likely to be resilient and who is most likely to be at risk for later unexplained illness.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Group 1 Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Non-Specific Physical Symptoms [pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediately post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return from deployment (Phase 3), 1 year post-return from deployment (Phase 4)]
Severity of non-specific physical symptoms from the 15 item Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2002). Scale score range is 0-30. Higher scores indicate greater non-specific physical symptom severity. This scale does not contain subscales.
- Physical Functional Status [pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediate post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return (Phase 3), 1 year post-return (Phase 4)]
Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) from the Veterans RAND (VR) 36 measure (Kazis, 2000). Composite scores are normed to a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Scores can range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
- Mental Functional Status [pre-deployment, immediate post-deployment, 3 months post-return, 1 year post-return]
Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) from the Veterans-RAND (VR) 36 (Kazis, 2000). MCS is a composite score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scale scores range from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better mental function.
- Health Care Utilization [pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediate post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return (Phase 3), 1 year post-return (Phase 4)]
This variable is a sum score of the self-reported number of healthcare provider visits and emergency room visits in the prior 12 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, New Jersey (NJ) and Camp Shelby, Mississippi (MS)
Exclusion Criteria:
- There are some drug exclusions for anything that substantially affects cardiovascular function.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Jackson, MS | Jackson | Mississippi | United States | 39216 |
2 | East Orange Campus of the VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ | East Orange | New Jersey | United States | 07018 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen S. Quigley, PhD, East Orange Campus of the VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- IIR 02-296
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 838 |
COMPLETED | 790 |
NOT COMPLETED | 48 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Overall Participants | 838 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
27.9
(8.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
96
11.5%
|
Male |
742
88.5%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |
White/Causasian |
564
67.3%
|
Hispanic/Latino |
33
3.9%
|
Black/African American/Non-Hispanic |
72
8.6%
|
Black/African American/Hispanic |
1
0.1%
|
Asian |
12
1.4%
|
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander |
10
1.2%
|
American Indian or Alaskan Native |
46
5.5%
|
Unknown/Not Provided |
100
11.9%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
838
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Non-Specific Physical Symptoms |
---|---|
Description | Severity of non-specific physical symptoms from the 15 item Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2002). Scale score range is 0-30. Higher scores indicate greater non-specific physical symptom severity. This scale does not contain subscales. |
Time Frame | pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediately post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return from deployment (Phase 3), 1 year post-return from deployment (Phase 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not all of the 790 completers has complete data on the non-specific physical symptoms measure. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Measure Participants | 767 |
Phase 1 |
5.2
(3.9)
|
Phase 2 |
7.9
(4.9)
|
Phase 3 |
7.7
(5.1)
|
Phase 4 |
7.7
(5.4)
|
Title | Physical Functional Status |
---|---|
Description | Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) from the Veterans RAND (VR) 36 measure (Kazis, 2000). Composite scores are normed to a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. Scores can range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better physical function. |
Time Frame | pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediate post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return (Phase 3), 1 year post-return (Phase 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not all of the 790 completers has complete data on this physical functional status measure. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Measure Participants | 762 |
Phase 1 |
55.5
(5.2)
|
Phase 2 |
53.7
(6.9)
|
Phase 3 |
52.8
(7.6)
|
Phase 4 |
51.5
(8.8)
|
Title | Mental Functional Status |
---|---|
Description | Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) from the Veterans-RAND (VR) 36 (Kazis, 2000). MCS is a composite score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scale scores range from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better mental function. |
Time Frame | pre-deployment, immediate post-deployment, 3 months post-return, 1 year post-return |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not all of the 790 completers has complete data on the mental functional status measure. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Measure Participants | 762 |
Phase 1 |
48.0
(9.1)
|
Phase 2 |
45.7
(10.7)
|
Phase 3 |
45.0
(11.5)
|
Phase 4 |
44.9
(12.4)
|
Title | Health Care Utilization |
---|---|
Description | This variable is a sum score of the self-reported number of healthcare provider visits and emergency room visits in the prior 12 months. |
Time Frame | pre-deployment (Phase 1), immediate post-deployment (Phase 2), 3 months post-return (Phase 3), 1 year post-return (Phase 4) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not all of the 790 completers has complete data on the healthcare utilization measure. |
Arm/Group Title | All Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS |
Measure Participants | 752 |
Phase 1 |
0.78
(0.87)
|
Phase 2 |
0.68
(0.81)
|
Phase 3 |
0.69
(0.74)
|
Phase 4 |
1.11
(0.97)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Data were collected at all 4 time points (pre-deployment=Phase 1, immediate post-deployment=Phase 2, 3 months post-deployment=Phase 3, one year post-deployment=Phase 4). The entire duration was about 2 years given an average deployment of about one year. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | All Participants | |
Arm/Group Description | Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers deploying to a hazardous deployment from Fort Dix, NJ and Camp Shelby, MS | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/838 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
All Participants | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/838 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Karen S. Quigley, Ph.D., Research Physiologist |
---|---|
Organization | Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital |
Phone | 781-687-2273 |
karen.quigley@va.gov |
- IIR 02-296