GrandP/SPCG19: Immediate Curative vs Conservative Treatment in Older Men With M0, High-risk Prostate Cancer

Sponsor
Sven Löffeler (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05448547
Collaborator
Oslo University Hospital (Other), Klinbeforsk (Other)
980
11
2
171
89.1
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

It is currently unclear if immediate curative treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) of high-risk prostate cancer without metastasis in older men (>=75 years) generates the same survival benefits as in younger patients or if the harms/ side-effects of immediate curative treatment outweigh the benefits. In this study the investigators randomize older patients with high-risk, non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer to either immediate curative therapy or to conservative, more problem-oriented therapy to investigate if immediate curative treatment prolongs life, improves quality of life and is cost-effective.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Radiotherapy or surgery
  • Other: initial observation
  • Drug: Hormone therapy
Phase 3

Detailed Description

There is a lack of both level 1 evidence and consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy for older men (>=75 years) with non-metastatic, high-risk prostate cancer. Currently, in Scandinavia, the majority of older patients are treated conservatively, i.e. with hormone therapy or watchful waiting while some centers recommend immediate curative therapy regardless of patient age. Older patients thus risk both undertreatment and overtreatment of their cancer. This randomized clinical trial investigates if immediate curative therapy of high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer prolongs life (as it does in younger patients) and improves health-related quality of life. Furthermore, this trial investigates if the early side effects of immediate curative therapy are compensated by better long-term tumor control, better quality of life, functional status and improved survival.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
980 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
randomized, parallel, open-labelrandomized, parallel, open-label
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel Group Treatment, Phase 3, Two-arm Study to Measure the Effect on Overall Survival and Quality of Life of Immediate Curative Therapy Compared With Standard Conservative Treatment in Older Male Participants Aged ≥ 75 Years With Non-metastatic, High-risk Prostate Cancer
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2029
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2036

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: immediate curative therapy

Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive immediate curative therapy in the form of either radiotherapy to the prostate in combination with hormone therapy (ADT or monotherapy) or surgery (radical prostatectomy). Standard treatment in this arm is radiotherapy + hormone therapy. Surgery is reserved for patients with strong preferences against radiotherapy.

Radiation: Radiotherapy or surgery
see arm/ group description

Active Comparator: initial observation/ hormone therapy

Patients in this arm will either be observed (with localized high-risk prostate cancer) or receive hormone therapy (locally advanced prostate cancer; ADT or monotherapy). Further local or systemic therapy is given at doctor's discretion triggered by local or/ and systemic progression.

Other: initial observation
see arm/ group description

Drug: Hormone therapy
androgen depression therapy (ADT) by either LHRH agonist or antagonist or androgen monotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall survival [10 years following end of recruitment]

    overall survival

  2. Burden of disease [0-10 years]

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life elderly patients with cancer (EORTC ELD 14), burden of disease scale (2 questions, score 0-100, high scores indicate high burden of disease)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Role functioning [0-10 years]

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), RF2 scale (2 questions, score 0-100, high scores indicate a high / healthy level of functioning)

  2. Urinary irritative/ obstructive symptoms [0-10 years]

    Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26),urinary scales (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)

  3. bowel symptoms [0-10 years]

    Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26), bowel scales (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)

  4. Prostate cancer morbidity [0-10 years]

    hospitalizations, interventions, complications due to local progression/ systemic progression)

  5. Prostate-cancer-specific survival [0-10 years]

    Prostate cancer deaths in intervention and control group

  6. Metastasis-free survival [0-10 years]

    time to metastasis detected radiographically due to symptoms or biochemical progression

  7. Symptom-/ intervention-free survival [0-10 years]

    time to symptoms/ need for interventions due to prostate cancer progression

  8. Quality of life-adjusted years [0-10 years]

    Euro QoL group questionaire (EQ-5D-5L) (1 =full health; 0= dead)

  9. need for secondary and tertiary therapy [0-10 years]

    use of second- and third-line therapies

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Institutionalized care [0-10 years]

    at each follow-up visit the living status of the patients will be assessed. If patients have become dependent on permanent nursing home/ assisted care this will be registered.

  2. Health-related quality of life in cancer patients [0-10 years]

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), scales not primary/ secondary outcome measures (All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems)

  3. Health-related quality of life in older cancer patients [0-10 years]

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire for quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30), scales not primary outcome (All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. High scores indicate poor mobility, good family support, much worry about the future, good maintenance of autonomy and purpose)

  4. Quality of Life issues in patients with prostate cancer [0-10 years]

    Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form questionnaire (EPIC-26), scales not secondary outcomes (score 0-100, higher scores indicating better outcomes)

  5. Instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) [0-10 years]

    Lawton and Brody questionnaire (8 questions, minimum score 0, maximum score 5, higher scores indicating need for assistance)

  6. Personal activities of daily living (pADL) [0-10 years]

    Lawton and Brody questionnaire (6 questions, minimum score 0, maximum score 5, higher scores indicating need for assistance)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
75 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Participant must be 75 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent.

  2. Participants who are healthy as determined by medical evaluation and geriatric G8/ miniCOGTM evaluation (G8: Fit, score >14, or reversibly frail; miniCOGTM: score >2)

And who have PCa (diagnosed ≤6 months) with one or both of the following features:
  • Gleason grade 8-10 (ISUP group 4 and 5) other than microscopic, low-volume disease (tumor must be either palpable or visible on MRI, i.e., PIRADS 4 or 5)

  • Locally advanced PCa (T3 or T4) (unequivocal findings of clinical/ radiological T3 or clinical/ radiological T4 on DRE or MRI; broad capsular contact of tumor on MRI is treated as localized disease, T2, in the context of this study)

  • Able to read, understand and fill in HRQoL questionnaires (PROMS)

  1. Male

  2. Capable of giving signed informed consent as described in Appendix 1, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical Conditions

  1. Dementia (unable to consent) Prior/Concomitant Therapy

  2. Prior radiation to the pelvis

  3. Hormone therapy >3 months prior to randomization Diagnostic assessments

  4. Lymph node metastasis (N0) on MRI, CT or PSMA-PET CT (equivocal N-findings =N0; borderline cases will be discussed and called by a study tumor board).

  5. Distant metastasis (M0) on MRI, CT, bone scan or PSMA-PET CT (equivocal bone scan findings need to be confirmed with MRI or CT; borderline cases will be discussed by a study tumor board).

Other Exclusions

  1. Disabled or severe comorbidity (identified by G8 screening)

  2. Unable to read, understand or fill out HRQoL questionnaires (PROMS)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rigshospital Copenhagen Denmark
2 Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
3 Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
4 Sunmøre Hospital Trust Ålesund Møre Og Romsdal Norway
5 Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Rogaland Norway
6 Sørlandet Hospital Trust Kristiansand Sørlandet Norway 4604
7 St. Olavs Hospital Trondheim Trøndelag Norway 7006
8 Vestfold Hospital Trust (Hospital of Vestfold) Tønsberg Vestfold Norway 3103
9 Innlandet Hospital Trust Hamar Norway
10 Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
11 University Hospital of Northern Norway Tromsø Norway

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sven Löffeler
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • Klinbeforsk

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sven Loffeler, MD, PhD, The Hospital of Vestfold

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sven Löffeler, Principal investigator, The Hospital of Vestfold
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05448547
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GrandP
First Posted:
Jul 7, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 13, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sven Löffeler, Principal investigator, The Hospital of Vestfold
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 13, 2022