Micro-ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04832997
Collaborator
(none)
235
1
1
24.5
9.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a monocentre, paired-cohort, prospective study. Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits. The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type prostate biopsies patients will undergo. During the following visit patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3 and PRI-MUS ≥ 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx (Group 4). Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx (Group 1). Patients with only postitive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 2). Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 3).

Our hypothesis is that the sensitivity for csPCa (defined as prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3+4) of Micro-US will be superior or at least equal to that of mpMRI. Despite the introduction of the mpMRI and MRI-TBx has improved the diagnostic pathway of PCa, the proportion of men with negative mpMRI with a csPCa is still difficult to delineate due to the high variability of mpMRI negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity. In this context, a specific standardization of the use of Micro-US may play a crucial role to optimize PCa diagnostic pathway. Moreover, a direct comparison between Micro-US and mpMRI might be useful to determinate whether Micro-US could be more accurate than mpMRI for PCa diagnosis. Furthermore, in patients with suspicion of PCa the combined use between mpMRI and Micro-US might increase the detection of csPCa and reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, improving mpMRI limitations in NPV and specificity. Demonstrating that Micro-US provides a similar sensitivity for csPCa as compared to mpMRI may lead to its definitive inclusion in daily clinical practice, potentially replacing mpMRI, streamlining the current diagnostic pathway of PCa.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Prostate biopsy systematic random prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) + eventual MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) + eventual microUS-targeted (Micro-US-TBx)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
235 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Every patient will receive the same diagnostic test (MRI and Micro-US) in a randomized sequenceEvery patient will receive the same diagnostic test (MRI and Micro-US) in a randomized sequence
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Micro-ultrasound or MRI-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 14, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: mpMRI plus Micro-US

Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits (randomized sequence). The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type of prostate biopsies patients will undergo.

Diagnostic Test: Prostate biopsy systematic random prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) + eventual MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) + eventual microUS-targeted (Micro-US-TBx)
Patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS >= 3 and PRI-MUS >= 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx. Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI [through study completation, an average time of 2 years]

    To compare the sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of clinically significant prostate cancer detected with the inclusion of Micro-US within the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer [through study completation, an average time of 2 years]

    To report the diagnostic benefit related with the use of Micro-US in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway

  2. Proportion of men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer detected by MRI-TBx vs. Micro-US-TBx [through study completation, an average time of 2 years]

  3. Proportion of men with at least one lesion detected by mpMRI vs. Micro-US [through study completation, an average time of 2 years]

  4. Proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer detected by Micro-US-TBx missed by MRI-TBx and vice-versa [through study completation, an average time of 2 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy

  • Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml

  • Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ-confined prostate cancer)

  • Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol

  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer

  • Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer

  • Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated GFR ≤ 50mls/min)

  • Contraindication to prostate biopsy

  • Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI

  • Previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work

  • Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 IRCCS San Raffaele Milan Italy 20132

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • IRCCS San Raffaele

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Prof. Alberto Briganti, Full Professor, IRCCS San Raffaele
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04832997
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • US-MIRROR
First Posted:
Apr 6, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Apr 6, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 6, 2021