CivaSheet With Radical Prostatectomy & Adjuvant External Beam Radiation

Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03657108
Collaborator
(none)
12
2
4
56.2
6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A phase I single-arm open label dose escalation study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of Civasheet® with radical prostatectomy (RP) and adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a 3+3 dose escalation design among participants with high risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Civasheet 60 Gy
  • Radiation: Civasheet 75 Gy
  • Radiation: Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Using preoperative MRI imaging to identify areas suspicious of local advancement in addition to identifying areas with a higher likelihood of a positive margin during RP due to the presence of high risk features, Civasheet® and its inherently flexible structure allow the sheet to be directly implanted on areas suspicious for local advancement and positive surgical margins for direct application of radiation to these areas. The custom, single planar layer, integrative gold shielding of Civasheet® also allows radiation to be provided unidirectionally to allow healthy tissue (i.e., bladder, rectum) to be shielded from radiation; possibly affording a lower rate of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity and adverse events. During EBRT, radiation especially for high risk PCa is provided at high rates to the entire prostatic bed with the seminal vesicles, pelvic lymph nodes and a surrounding margin often targeted to eliminate positive margins and cancer from locally advanced areas in which the cancer may have spread (i.e., seminal vesicles, bladder neck). These high rates of radiation often damage surrounding tissue and result in rectal and bladder complications in addition to urethral strictures among other adverse complications. Since Civasheet® will provide radiation to the prostatic bed, a lower dose of EBRT will be used to treat the prostatic bed and potentially lower adverse bladder and rectal effects compared to RP + RT at 60 Gy. 103 Pd seeds of Civasheet® also illuminate on imaging. Therefore placing Civasheet® based on pre-operative identification of areas suspicious for local advancement and areas of likely positive surgical margins during RP will allow for targeted EBRT to the locally advanced areas. Since EBRT can be targeted using Civasheet®, a lower and more direct dose of radiation during EBRT may be used to treat local advancement and positive surgical margins which will potentially reduce toxicity and complications associated with higher doses of radiation.

The above properties are likely to facilitate improved cancer control with more direct and local application of radiation to areas of local advancement surrounding the prostate. These features are also likely to facilitate a reduced complication and toxicity profile since Civasheet® allows EBRT to be applied more accurately and at a lower dose and also the unidirectional radiation applied directly by Civasheet® protects surrounding healthy tissue from receiving radiation.No other studies have attempted to use Civasheet® to improve PCa control and reduce toxicity and complications associated with radiation for participants with high-risk prostate cancer. The investigators anticipate that implanting Civasheet® on areas suspicious for local advancement and positive margins based on pre-operative MRI findings and identification of high risk features in addition to relying on the illumination provided by Civasheet® for targeted adjuvant EBRT will provide a safer complication profile and eventually provide evidence for superior cancer control, lower toxicity and less adverse events than EBRT+ RP alone in a future randomized controlled trial. The investigators therefore propose a phase I single-arm open label dose escalation study to evaluate the MTD and safety of Civasheet® with RP and adjuvant EBRT in a 3+3 dose escalation design among participants with high risk PCa.With this study, the investigators to better understand the MTD, safety and toxicity profile of Civasheet® in the setting of RP + adjuvant EBRT in the treatment of high-risk PCa.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
3+3 dose escalation study to determine MTD3+3 dose escalation study to determine MTD
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase I Single-Arm Open Label Dose-Escalation Study of CivaSheet With Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients With High Risk Prostate Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 27, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: group 1 of 60 Gy dose

The first 3 subsequent patients with high risk prostate cancer will be undergoing radical prostatectomy Interventions: Civasheet 60 Gy + Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy

Radiation: Civasheet 60 Gy
implantable proposed doses of Civasheet are 60 Gy

Radiation: Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy
45 Gy in 25 fractions
Other Names:
  • EBRT
  • Experimental: group 2 of 60 Gy dose

    The second 3 subsequent patients with high risk prostate cancer will be undergoing radical prostatectomy Interventions: Civasheet 60 Gy + Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy

    Radiation: Civasheet 60 Gy
    implantable proposed doses of Civasheet are 60 Gy

    Radiation: Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy
    45 Gy in 25 fractions
    Other Names:
  • EBRT
  • Experimental: group 1 of 75 Gy dose

    The third 3 subsequent patients with high risk prostate cancer will be undergoing radical prostatectomy Interventions: Civasheet 75 Gy + Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy

    Radiation: Civasheet 75 Gy
    implantable proposed doses of Civasheet are 75 Gy

    Radiation: Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy
    45 Gy in 25 fractions
    Other Names:
  • EBRT
  • Experimental: group 2 of 75 Gy dose

    The fourth 3 subsequent patients with high risk prostate cancer will be undergoing radical prostatectomy Interventions: Civasheet 75 Gy + Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy

    Radiation: Civasheet 75 Gy
    implantable proposed doses of Civasheet are 75 Gy

    Radiation: Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy
    45 Gy in 25 fractions
    Other Names:
  • EBRT
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) [90 days]

      MTD is defined as the highest dose of the Civasheet® not yielding unacceptable toxicity. Specifically if > 33 % of subjects experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at any dose level, the dose level below that level will be considered the MTD.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Surgical Complication Rate [90 days]

      Rate for surgical complications, acute (< 90 days) and late (18 months days)

    2. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) [5 years]

      Serum PSA levels

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Acute radiation toxicity [3 months]

      Acute radiation toxicity scale of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG); 4 Grades where Grade 1 is the better outcome and Grade 4 is the worse outcome

    2. Late radiation toxicity [5 years]

      Late radiation toxicity scale of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG); 4 Grades where Grade 1 is the better outcome and Grade 4 is the worse outcome

    3. Radiation adverse event(s) [5 years]

      National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0); 5 Grades where Grade 1 is the better outcome and Grade 5 is the worse outcome

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Any subject with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) very high or high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate defined as ≥T3a, Gleason score ≥ 8, or PSA > 20 who is eligible for RP (open or robotic) with adjuvant EBRT as an initial treatment option.

    • Any subject with NCCN Intermediate Risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate defined as T2b-T2c, Gleason score 7, or PSA 10-20 who is eligible for RP (open or robotic) with adjuvant EBRT as an initial treatment option and at least one of the following adverse features present in pre-operative imaging: seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI), extracapsular extension (ECE), N1 disease.

    • Subject must have had a pre-operative MRI or must obtain a pre-operative MRI to be eligible for participation in this study.

    • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Any subject who has undergone prior radiation to the pelvis.

    • Subjects presenting with distant metastases.

    • On any investigational drug(s), androgen deprivation therapy or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding screening.

    • Currently taking immunosuppressants, or with poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c >8).

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mount Sinai West New York New York United States 10019
    2 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York United States 10029

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ketan K. Badani, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ketan Badani, Principal Investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03657108
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • GCO 16-1314
    • PD 16-03067
    First Posted:
    Sep 4, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 29, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Ketan Badani, Principal Investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 29, 2021