HYPO-5: Ultra Hypofractionnated Radiotherapy With HDR Brachytherapy Boost.

Sponsor
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05786742
Collaborator
(none)
205
1
2
236
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Phase 1-2 study, comparing ultra-hypofractionnated (UH) to a moderately hypofractionnated (MH) radiation therapy, with image guided HDR prostate brachytherapy. Using iso-equivalent doses, a non-inferiority analysis will be done in order to prove UH non-inferior to MH, toxicity wise. Acceptability, tolerability, acute and late toxicity will be reported. MRI visible dominant intra-prostatic lesion will be outlines and variability between radiation oncologists and radiologists will be reported. As secondary objective, biochemical and clinical failure free survival will be reported at 5 & 10 years.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: grade and compare reported side effects between groups
N/A

Detailed Description

Phase 1 : consists in a feasibility study (First 28 patients).

Phase 2 : monocentric prospective comparative cohort study.

Recruitment :
  • "Centre intégré de cancérologie du CHU de Québec-Université Laval."

  • Recruitment period: December 2015 to June 2023

Brachytherapy :
  • Implantation under general or spinal anesthesia

  • Foley catheter insertion in bladder.

  • TRUS prostate localisation.

  • Prostate volume measurement.

  • Gold fiducial markers (3) insertion.

  • Prostate brachytherapy catheters (14 à 21) insertion.

  • Cystoscopy for bladder and urethra integrity control.

  • Re-insertion of foley catheter after cystoscopy.

Planning imaging: TRUS or CT scan (has needed).

Structures delineation by radiation oncologist (brachytherapist).

  • Prostate

  • Seminale vesicles

  • Rectum

  • Colon sigmoïde

  • Bladder

  • Urethra

  • Penile bulb

Dosimetric optimisation

  • Oncentra Prostate v. 4.2.2 d'Elekta brachytherapy (Veenendaal, The Netherlands)

  • Oncentra Brachy version 4.6 (if under CT scan).

Treatment (brachytherapy dose delivery).

  • 15 Gy in one fraction

  • Direct interstitial dose monitoring (20 patients or more). Fiber-optic dosimeter inserted in prostate brachytherpy catheter for live dose delivery mesurements.

Foley ablation under full bladder, same day or day after therapy.

Radiotherapy:
  • Via IMRT, VMAT or SBRT technics.

  • Dose : 25 Gy in 5 fractions administered over a 7 days period. 2 to 3 fractions separated by 2 days, weekend break.

  • PTV includes prostate and the first centimeter of seminal vesicle.

Simulation

  • one week post brachytherapy

  • standard has described in the department procedure manual.

  • maximal CT scan slice thickness : 2-3mm.

  • uretro-graphy done to identify urogenital sphincter.

Multiparametric MRI

  • If no counter-indication and available,

  • a T2 tridimensional sequence for prostate delineation

  • slice thickness : 1 mm.

  • a diffusion weighted sequence will be done.

  • a DTI with tractography can be done optionally.

  • contrast media (gadolinium) is optional.

Physique

  • Linac energy (between 6 MV to 18 MV).

  • ARC therapy technique will be used

  • planification softwares: Éclipse, Pinnacle or Raystation.

  • Portal (kV-kV) imagery will be used for marker match.

  • CBCT will be done at each fraction delivered.

Clinical and dosimetric data will be collected prior treatment.

Primary objectives :
  • Toxicity analysis will be quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) at 1, 2 and 5 years post-therapy, and has needed at FU visits. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis will be used to report toxicity evolution through time.

  • median IPSS scores will be reported at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-therapy. IPSS median time to baseline return will be calculated.

  • IPSS urinary scores, sexual function (SHIM) and GI toxicity (CTCAE-v5) and quality of life questionnaires ( EPIC-26) will be given at 3, 6 months and yearly thereafter (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-treatment.

Secondary objectives : Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) recommendation will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
205 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Prospective comparative cohort study with non inferiority analysis UH-IMRT combined to 15 Gy HDR Brachytherapy will considerably reduce the treatment fraction delivered while maintaining b-DFS and Side-effects at comparable levels to our actual reported prostate cancer patient population, without lymph nodes involvement (risk being less than 15%). We believe that this therapeutic regime will show to be non-inferior to our actual standard therapeutic regimeProspective comparative cohort study with non inferiority analysis UH-IMRT combined to 15 Gy HDR Brachytherapy will considerably reduce the treatment fraction delivered while maintaining b-DFS and Side-effects at comparable levels to our actual reported prostate cancer patient population, without lymph nodes involvement (risk being less than 15%). We believe that this therapeutic regime will show to be non-inferior to our actual standard therapeutic regime
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
ULTRA-HYPO Fractionated (UHF) Compared to Moderate-HYPO Fractionated (MHF) Prostate IGRT With HDR Brachytherapy BOOST : A Phase 1-2 Study.
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2033

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: ultra hypo fractionation radiation therapy

comparative PRO's of 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions (Ultra hypo fractionation) administered to prostate and 1st centimeter of proximal seminal vesicle, starting mid week and ending mid following week.

Radiation: grade and compare reported side effects between groups
Compare experimental ultra hypo fractionation (25 Gy in 5 daily fractions administered starting mid week and ending mid following week) to our standard fractionation (either 37,5 Gy given in 15 daily fractions, or 36 Gy in 12 daily fractions). Toxicity analysis will be quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) at 1, 2 and 5 years post-therapy, and has needed at FU visits. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis will be used to report toxicity evolution through time. median IPSS scores will be reported at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-therapy. IPSS median time to baseline return will be calculated. IPSS urinary scores, sexual function (SHIM) and GI toxicity (CTCAE-v5) and quality of life questionnaires ( EPIC-26) will be given at 3, 6 months and yearly thereafter (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-treatment.
Other Names:
  • report and compare IPSS scores
  • report and compare EPIC26 scores
  • report and compare SHIM scores
  • report and compare CTCAE scores
  • report and compare clinical outcomes
  • Active Comparator: moderate hypo fractionation radiation therapy

    PRO's of moderate hypo fractionation, 37,5 Gy in 15 or 36 Gy in 12 daily fractions administered 5 days per week.

    Radiation: grade and compare reported side effects between groups
    Compare experimental ultra hypo fractionation (25 Gy in 5 daily fractions administered starting mid week and ending mid following week) to our standard fractionation (either 37,5 Gy given in 15 daily fractions, or 36 Gy in 12 daily fractions). Toxicity analysis will be quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) at 1, 2 and 5 years post-therapy, and has needed at FU visits. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis will be used to report toxicity evolution through time. median IPSS scores will be reported at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-therapy. IPSS median time to baseline return will be calculated. IPSS urinary scores, sexual function (SHIM) and GI toxicity (CTCAE-v5) and quality of life questionnaires ( EPIC-26) will be given at 3, 6 months and yearly thereafter (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-treatment.
    Other Names:
  • report and compare IPSS scores
  • report and compare EPIC26 scores
  • report and compare SHIM scores
  • report and compare CTCAE scores
  • report and compare clinical outcomes
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at baseline, prior treatment]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    2. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 3 months post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    3. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 6 months post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    4. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 1 year post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    5. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 2 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    6. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 3 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    7. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 4 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    8. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 5 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    9. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at baseline, prior treatment]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    10. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 3 months post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    11. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 6 months post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    12. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 1 year post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    13. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 2 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    14. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 3 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    15. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 4 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    16. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE) [at 5 years post-therapy]

      quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

    17. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at baseline, prior treatment]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at baseline, prior treatment

    18. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 3 months]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-therapy

    19. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 6 months]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-therapy

    20. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 1 year]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-therapy

    21. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 2 years]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-therapy

    22. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 3 years]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-therapy

    23. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 4 years]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-therapy

    24. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS) [at 5 years]

      median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-therapy

    25. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [baseline, prior treatment]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at baseline, prior treatment

    26. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 3 months]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-treatment

    27. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 6 months]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-treatment

    28. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 1 year]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-treatment

    29. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 2 years]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-treatment

    30. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 3 years]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-treatment

    31. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 4 years]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-treatment

    32. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26) [at 5 years]

      median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-treatment

    33. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [baseline, prior treatment]

      median SHIM scores will be reported at baseline prior treatment

    34. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 3 months]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-treatment

    35. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 6 months]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-treatment

    36. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 1 year]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-treatment

    37. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 2 years]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-treatment

    38. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 3 years]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-treatment

    39. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 4 years]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-treatment

    40. sexual function analysis (SHIM) [at 5 years]

      median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-treatment

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Clinical outcomes [at 5 years]

      Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well for disease free survival, metastasis free survival and overall survival.

    2. Clinical outcomes [at 10 years]

      Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well for disease free survival, metastasis free survival and overall survival.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 95 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Biopsy proven Prostate adenocarcinoma

    • Stage T1c, T2 (Annex 2)

    • Stage Nx or N0

    • Stage Mx or M0

    • PSA < 20ng/ml

    • Gleason Score 6 or 7

    • Having the ability to sing a written consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Age < 18ans

    • Clinical Stage T3 or T4

    • Stage N1

    • Stage M1

    • PSA > 20

    • Gleason Score 8 to 10

    • IPSS Score > 20 alpha-blocking medication.

    • Prior pelvic radiotherapy.

    • History of active collagenosis (Lupus, Sclerodermia, Dermatomyosis)

    • Past history of Inflammatory Bowell Disease

    • Bilateral hip prosthesis

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 CHUdeQuebec Quebec Canada G1R 2J6

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Andre-Guy Martin, CHU de Québec

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    André-Guy Martin, Clinical professor, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.C., CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05786742
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • HYPO-5
    First Posted:
    Mar 28, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 28, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by André-Guy Martin, Clinical professor, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.C., CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 28, 2023