Urology San Antonio MRI/MicroUS Comparison
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study compares micro-ultrasound image targeted prostate biopsy with multi-parametric MRI targeted biopsy in men indicated for prostate biopsy due to suspicion of prostate cancer. Both imaging techniques will be applied to each subject and compared, along with systematic biopsy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The investigational protocol describes a study designed to compare ultra-high resolution transrectal micro-ultrasound (micro-US), and multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI). These modalities are both used clinically to identify targets for prostate biopsy, however little data is available to compare their sensitivity. While mpMRI is used clinically to identify targets for biopsy, it is not used for real-time biopsy guidance due to challenges performing the biopsy procedure within the MRI gantry. Instead, targets identified on mpMRI are sampled during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy as part of the prostate biopsy procedure, often using software assisted fusion products. For this investigation, the biopsy procedure will be guided by transrectal micro-US (current standard of care at Urology San Antonio), and will include systematic (standard, random, extended sextant) plus image-guided prostate biopsies among men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and an indication for prostate biopsy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Micro-Ultrasound Biopsy
|
Diagnostic Test: Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy
Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system
|
Experimental: MRI Targeted Biopsy
|
Diagnostic Test: mpMRI targeted biopsy
Multiparametric MRI targeted biopsy using software assisted MRI/US fusion
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Cancer [At time of biopsy]
Comparison of subject-level detection rate of clinically significant cancer (csPCa, defined as Grade Group 2 or higher) between micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy and mpMRI targeted biopsy.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Men presenting for prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
-
40-75 years old
-
Available mpMRI images and report, performed according to the PI-RADS v2 standard
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Men with anorectal abnormalities preventing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy
-
Men who are unable to provide their own informed consent
-
Prostate volume on MRI > 100cc
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Urology San Antonio - Pasteur Plaza Surgery Center | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Exact Imaging
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David R Talley, MD, Urology San Antonio
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- EVU-2018-001
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Micro-ultrasound Biopsy Then MRI Biopsy |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy: Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system Followed in the same session by MRI biopsy by a second blinded operator |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 120 |
COMPLETED | 118 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Micro-ultrasound Biopsy Then MRI Biopsy |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy: Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system Followed in the same session by... mpMRI targeted biopsy: Multiparametric MRI targeted biopsy using software assisted MRI/US fusion |
Overall Participants | 118 |
Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
67
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
0
0%
|
Male |
118
100%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |
United States |
118
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Cancer |
---|---|
Description | Comparison of subject-level detection rate of clinically significant cancer (csPCa, defined as Grade Group 2 or higher) between micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy and mpMRI targeted biopsy. |
Time Frame | At time of biopsy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Micro-ultrasound Biopsy | MRI Targeted Biopsy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Micro-ultrasound biopsy: Micro-ultrasound biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system | mpMRI targeted biopsy: Multiparametric MRI targeted biopsy using software assisted MRI/US fusion |
Measure Participants | 118 | 118 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
38
32.2%
|
31
NaN
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | During biopsy procedure | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Micro-ultrasound Targeted Biopsy | MRI Targeted Biopsy | ||
Arm/Group Description | Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy: Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system | mpMRI targeted biopsy: Multiparametric MRI targeted biopsy using software assisted MRI/US fusion | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Micro-ultrasound Targeted Biopsy | MRI Targeted Biopsy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/118 (0%) | 0/118 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Micro-ultrasound Targeted Biopsy | MRI Targeted Biopsy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/118 (0%) | 0/118 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Micro-ultrasound Targeted Biopsy | MRI Targeted Biopsy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/118 (0%) | 0/118 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Brian Wodlinger |
---|---|
Organization | Exact Imaging |
Phone | 6475279032 |
bwodlinger@exactimaging.com |
- EVU-2018-001