PRO-IMPACT: Prospective Clinical Utility Study to Assess the Impact of Decipher on Treatment Decisions After Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The influence of Decipher test on urologist and patient treatment plan choices immediately post RP and at the time of PSA rise or BCR
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This prospectively decision impact study will evaluate physicians and patient treatment plan choices before and after reviewing Decipher results for eligible patient cases. The clinical utility of Decipher will be evaluated for patients meeting the inclusion criteria at two time-points post-RP:
-
In the adjuvant setting: within 12 months after surgery (in the absence of detectable PSA rise of BCR)
-
In the salvage setting: post-RP with evidence of PSA rise or BCR (defined as PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations)
A total of 150 patient cases, in each arm, will be prospectively selected from clinical sites. The study as a whole will enroll 300 patient cases.
As a condition of participation in the study, each clinical site must agree to provide a minimum of 10 patient cases.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Salvage setting The clinical utility of Decipher will be evaluated for patients meeting the inclusion criteria in the salvage setting: post-RP with evidence of PSA rise or BCR (defined as PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations) |
Other: Decipher
|
Other: Adjuvant setting The clinical utility of Decipher will be evaluated for patients in the adjuvant setting: within 12 months after surgery (in the absence of detectable PSA rise of BCR) |
Other: Decipher
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of participants for which the Decipher test changes the urologist's and patient's treatment plan choices [3 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Measure the number of participants for which treatment was Increased or decreased in the intensity. [3 months]
This outcome will compare recommended treatment pre-Decipher to recommended treatment post-Decipher
- The number of different treatment plans most influenced by Decipher as a measure of clinical utility [12 months]
- Comparison of type of treatment plans between high risk and low risk patients [6 months]
How many treatment plans are similar for those considered at high versus low risk by Decipher test
- Account for the number of specific treatment assignments that correlated with a change in treatment recommendation [12 months]
- Frequency of follow visits as a measure of reproducibility [12 months]
The extent to which the Decipher test results influence urologist recommendations on frequency of follow-up for patients
- Measure the urologist's and patient's Level of confidence in their selected treatment plan through the use of a share decision making tool [3 months]
- Assess the number of physicians that assigned the same treatment treatment recommendations for patient of the same pathological profile as a measure of concordance [12 months]
- A measure of the patient's quality of life (QOL) as a measure of Decipher's clinical utility for patients [12 months]
The extent to which the Decipher test results affect patient comfort level with treatment decisions as based on QOL and treatment regret tools
- Evaluate number of participants which show coherence to treatment decisions [12 months]
For how many cases was the original selected treatment for a patient actually executed upon
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Pathological T3 stage of disease (i.e., EPE or SVI), or
-
Positive surgical margins, or
-
Detectable PSA, defined as PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations
Exclusion Criteria:
-
For adjuvant setting patients: Metastatic Disease (M+) prior to surgery
-
For salvage setting patients: Metastatic Disease at PSA rise
-
Failure of PSA to nadir after surgery
-
Received any neo-adjuvant prostate cancer treatment before radical prostatectomy
-
Received any adjuvant chemotherapy
-
Required patient clinical data is not available for evaluation of eligibility criteria
-
For adjuvant setting patients, any treatment received after surgery
-
For salvage setting patients, lack of documented treatment or management recommendation on file
-
Tissue specimen is inadequate for sampling and analysis
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alaska Urology Institute Alaska Clinical Research Center | Anchorage | Alaska | United States | 99503 |
2 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles, | California | United States | 90048 |
3 | University of Colorado, Denver Medical Campus | Aurora | Colorado | United States | 80045 |
4 | The Urology Center of Colorado | Denver | Colorado | United States | 80211 |
5 | Urological Research Network | Hialeah | Florida | United States | 33016 |
6 | Lakeland Regional Health Systems | Lakeland | Florida | United States | 33805 |
7 | University of Miami Miller School of Medicine | Miami | Florida | United States | 33101 |
8 | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
9 | Spectrum Health Medical Group | Grand Rapids | Michigan | United States | 49546 |
10 | Delaware Valley Urology, LLC | Voorhees | New Jersey | United States | 08043 |
11 | Carolina Urology Partners | Gastonia | North Carolina | United States | 28054 |
12 | Lancaster Urology | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | United States | 17604 |
13 | Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19107 |
14 | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19111 |
15 | UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | United States | 753910-9110 |
16 | Huntsman Cancer Hospital | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84112 |
17 | University of Vermont Medical Center | Burlington | Vermont | United States | 05401 |
18 | Virginia Urology | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23235 |
19 | University of Washington | Seattle | Washington | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- GenomeDx Biosciences Corp
- Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel W Lin, MD, The Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)
- Principal Investigator: John L Gore, MD, University of Washington
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Badani K, Thompson DJ, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Garrison J, Ghadessi M, Mitra AP, Wood PJ, Hornberger J. Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group. Oncotarget. 2013 Apr;4(4):600-9.
- Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, Verbaeys A, Bosset JF, van Velthoven R, Colombel M, van de Beek C, Verhagen P, van den Bergh A, Sternberg C, Gasser T, van Tienhoven G, Scalliet P, Haustermans K, Collette L; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Radiation Oncology and Genito-Urinary Groups. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61253-7. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
- Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA, Mitra AP, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Bergstralh EJ, Kollmeyer T, Fink S, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Ballman KV, Triche TJ, Black PC, Karnes RJ, Klee G, Davicioni E, Jenkins RB. Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066855. Print 2013.
- Hoffman KE, Nguyen PL, Chen MH, Chen RC, Choueiri TK, Hu JC, Kuban DA, D'Amico AV. Recommendations for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy in the United States before and after the presentation of randomized trials. J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.086. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
- Karnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Mitra AP, Crisan A, Erho N, Vergara IA, Lam LL, Carlson R, Thompson DJ, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Triche TJ, Kollmeyer T, Ballman KV, Black PC, Klee GG, Jenkins RB. Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2047-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
- Moinpour CM, Hayden KA, Unger JM, Thompson IM Jr, Redman MW, Canby-Hagino ED, Higgins BA, Sullivan JW, Lemmon D, Breslin S, Crawford ED, Southwest Oncology Group. Health-related quality of life results in pathologic stage C prostate cancer from a Southwest Oncology Group trial comparing radical prostatectomy alone with radical prostatectomy plus radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):112-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4505.
- Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Choi WW, Lei Y, Hoffman KE, Hu JC. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 20;29(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1217. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
- Silberstein JL, Vickers AJ, Power NE, Fine SW, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Laudone VP. Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4855-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26132. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
- Swanson GP, Basler JW. Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy. J Cancer. 2010 Dec 7;2:1-19.
- Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2329-35.
- Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
- Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, Siegmann A, Golz R, Störkel S, Willich N, Semjonow A, Souchon R, Stöckle M, Rübe C, Weissbach L, Althaus P, Rebmann U, Kälble T, Feldmann HJ, Wirth M, Hinke A, Hinkelbein W, Miller K. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2924-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9563. Epub 2009 May 11.
- Zelefsky MJ, Eastham JA, Cronin AM, Fuks Z, Zhang Z, Yamada Y, Vickers A, Scardino PT. Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1508-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2265. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
- CU 004