PARTIQoL: Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT01617161
Collaborator
University of Pennsylvania (Other), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH), Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center (Other), ProCure Proton Therapy Center (Other), Washington University School of Medicine (Other), University of Washington (Other), Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (Other), Provision Center for Proton Therapy (Other), Mayo Clinic (Other), University of Maryland Medical Center (Other), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Other), University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute (Other)
454
13
2
172.2
34.9
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

We are studying whether men being treated for prostate cancer have the same amount of side effects from either one of two different external radiation treatments: IMRT or PBT. With IMRT, a number of x-ray beams are used to shape the radiation to the prostate. PBT is another type of external radiation treatment for prostate cancer that is used in a few centers in the United States. Protons are tiny particles with positive charge that can be controlled to travel a certain distance and stop. PBT is precise like IMRT, but it uses proton beams instead of x-ray beams.

IMRT and PBT aim to deliver most of the radiation to the prostate cancer while sparing surrounding tissues. Both IMRT and PBT have been used in the treatment of prostate cancer and are thought to be equally effective at curing prostate cancer. However, both treatments have also been shown to cause the potential side effects of radiation, including bowel, urinary and erectile problems. It is possible that side effect rates with PBT will be lower, the same, or even higher than with IMRT, but this has not been studied well to date. Though both of these radiation therapies have been used in the past to treat prostate cancer, there has never been a study that compares the effects of these two therapies to see which one has less side effects.

In this research study, we are comparing IMRT to PBT to determine which therapy best minimizes the side effects of treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Proton Beam Therapy
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Because no one knows which of the study options is best, you will be "randomized" into one of the study groups: IMRT or PBT. Randomization means that you are put into a group by chance, like flipping a coin. Neither you nor the research doctor will choose which group you will be in. You will have an equal chance of being placed in either group. Randomization makes the study better from a scientific point of view because it helps ensure that patients receiving IMRT and proton therapy are similar. You will be receiving only one type of radiation, either IMRT or PBT throughout your participation in the study.

Before you begin radiation therapy you will have a pelvic CT scan in order to design your radiation treatment. Doctors will use information gathered from these scans to plan the best way to deliver radiation to your tumor.

Both types of radiation therapy will be given once a day for 5 days (no weekends or holidays) for up to 9 weeks. Both IMRT and PBT will require that you lie on a table for less than 15 minutes to obtain your treatment.

During each visit you will be asked questions about your general health and specific questions about any problems that you might be having and any medications you might be taking. You will also undergo a physical exam and complete some quality of life questionnaires.

After your radiation therapy you will have follow up visits at 3,6,9,12,18,24,36,48 and 60 months.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
454 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prostate Advanced Radiation Technologies Investigating Quality of Life (PARTIQoL): A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Therapy vs IMRT for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 25, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: PBT

Proton Beam Therapy

Radiation: Proton Beam Therapy
5 days per week up to 9 weeks

Active Comparator: IMRT

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
5 times per week up to 9 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy of PBT vs. IMRT [2 years]

    Compare the reduction in mean EPIC bowel scores for men with low or low-intermediate risk PCa treated with PBT versus IMRT at 24 months following radiation (where higher scores represent better outcomes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Disease Specific Quality of Life [2 years]

    Assess the effectiveness of PBT versus IMRT for men with low or low-intermediate risk PCa in terms of disease-specific quality of life as measured by patient-reported outcomes, perceptions of care and adverse events

  2. Cost Effectiveness of PBT vs. IMRT [2 years]

    Assess the cost-effectiveness of PBT versus IMRT under current conditions and model future cost-effectiveness for alternative treatment delivery and cost scenarios

  3. Radiation Dose and Bowel, Urinary and Erectile Function [2 years]

    Develop predictive models to examine the associations between selected metrics of individual radiation dose distributions and patient reported bowel, urinary and erectile function

  4. Identification and Evaluation Biomarkers of PCa Behavior [2 years]

    Identify and evaluate biomarkers of prostate cancer behavior and response to radiotherapy

  5. Long Term Survival [10 years]

    Assess longer-term rates of disease-specific and overall survival as well as development of late effects such as second cancers

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosed with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate based on core-biopsy within 1 year of study entry from TRUS

  • Clinical stages T1c to T2c

  • PSA <20, within 6 months of study entry

  • Participants who are currently receiving Dutasteride (or have received it within the last 90 days) or Finasteride (or have received it within the last 30 days) must have a PSA of ≤ 10

  • Gleason score ≤6, 3 + 4 = 7, or 4 + 3 = 7

  • ECOG Performance Status 0-1 as documented within 3 months prior to study entry

  • Must have complete history and physical examination within 45 days of study entry and digital rectal examination of prostate within 180 days of study entry

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Prior surgery (not including TURP), cryosurgery, radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy or radiation for PCa

  • Prior or planned androgen deprivation or bilateral orchiectomy

  • Distant metastases, or clinically or pathologically involved lymph nodes confirmed by a CT scan within 365 days of study entry

  • Hip prosthesis, inflammatory bowel disease or connective tissue disorder such as active scleroderma or lupus

  • Individuals with a history of other malignancies are ineligible unless 1) they have been disease-free for at least 5 years OR 2) are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy with no plans for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and have received overall principal investigator approval.

  • Individuals who have AIDS (CD4 < 200 or an AIDS-defining illness) or are HIV positive and not on HAART therapy are ineligible.

  • Major medical or psychiatric illness

  • Individuals with any of the following conditions are excluded from this study:

  • Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months.

  • Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months.

  • Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration.

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration

  • History of Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects within the last 12 months

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute Jacksonville Florida United States 32206
2 Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center Chicago Illinois United States 60190
3 University of Maryland Medical Center College Park Maryland United States 20742
4 Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
5 Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center Danvers Massachusetts United States 01923
6 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905
7 Washington University Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
8 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey United States 08903
9 Princeton ProCure Proton Therapy Center Somerset New Jersey United States 08873
10 University Hospital of Cleveland Cleveland Ohio United States 44106
11 Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
12 Provision Proton Therapy Center Knoxville Tennessee United States 37909
13 University of Washington Medical Center Seattle Washington United States 98195

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center
  • ProCure Proton Therapy Center
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • University of Washington
  • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
  • Provision Center for Proton Therapy
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
  • University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason A Efstathiou, MD, DPhil, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Justin E Bekelman, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jason Efstathiou, Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01617161
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 11-497
First Posted:
Jun 12, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Aug 24, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Keywords provided by Jason Efstathiou, Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 24, 2022