MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy

Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT04026763
Collaborator
Philips Healthcare (Industry)
520
1
1
42.7
12.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will determine if targeted (Magnetic Resonance (MR) / Ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy) plus conventional biopsy is superior to conventional biopsy alone in diagnosing subjects with prostate cancer.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: prostate biopsy
  • Procedure: MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
  • Device: MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
N/A

Detailed Description

The efficacy of targeting lesions for surgery may be limited by the visibility of a target during the procedure. The successful outcome of surgical intervention depends upon accurate device placement, which may be very challenging in certain settings, such as when a kidney tumor only is visible for a brief moment during the transient arterial phase of a contrast injection, and soon disappearing on dynamic imaging.

Historically, prostate cancer was diagnosed by digitally guided trans-rectal prostate biopsies. With PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) screening and improvements in ultrasonography, trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy have become the standard of care to screen and diagnose localized prostate cancer. Standard US 12-14 core prostate biopsy is now common practice, detecting cancer in 27% to 44% of patients.

Prostate MR imaging at 3 Tesla magnet dramatically improves diagnostic utility dramatically but biopsies are difficult, time-consuming, and require specialized equipment, which increases the cost significantly.

To meet this challenge TRUS images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system. The urologist then performs directed prostate biopsies at MR-identified targets in addition to the standard prostate biopsies.

This study will consist of comparison of the standard of care prostate biopsy with the protocol biopsy which consists of a US guided prostate biopsy and a MR/US fusion tracked prostate biopsy. Each patient will act as their own control.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
520 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy- An Improved Way To Detect And Quantify Prostate Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
May 11, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Males with Prostate Cancer

Each participant will receive standard of care prostate biopsy as well as a US guided prostate biopsy and a MR/TRUS Fusion Guided prostate biopsy guided prostate biopsy.

Procedure: prostate biopsy
standard of care

Procedure: MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided fusion prostate biopsy, Transperineal Ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy
Other Names:
  • Fusion Biopsy
  • Device: MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    TRUS images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system. The urologist then performs directed prostate biopsies at MR-identified targets in addition to the standard prostate biopsies.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence of Prostate Cancer [Day 0 - day of procedure]

      Incidence of diagnosing subjects with prostate cancer with MR visible lesions

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence of adverse events [1 month]

      the incidence of adverse events occurring after a targeted and ultrasound guided prostate biopsy

    2. Pirads score [1 month]

      The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score classifies MRI lesions on a scale from 1 to 5, which reflects their level of suspicion from least to most. Higher score indicates more suspicion.

    3. Gleason score [1 month]

      The Gleason Score ranges from 1-5 and describes how much the cancer from a biopsy looks like healthy tissue (lower score) or abnormal tissue (higher score). Sum of the gleason grade of the most predominant tumor pattern and a second gleason grade of the second most predominant pattern. Full score from 2 to 10, with higher score indicating more clinically significance.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All patients must have a pre-operative MRI performed in accordance with the MT Sinai/NIH MR prostate imaging guidelines.

    • Age greater than 18 years.

    • No serious concurrent medical illness that would preclude the patient from making a rational informed decision on participation.

    • The ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and to comply with the protocol. If in question, an ethics consult will be obtained.

    • Ability to tolerate sedation and or general anesthesia if required.

    • PSA >2.5 or Abnormal digital rectal exam or current recommendations for biopsy from the American Urological Association

    • Pre-biopsy prostate MRI as described above, showing targetable lesions within 4 months of biopsy

    • Able to tolerate a ultrasound guided biopsy

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with an altered mental status that precludes understanding or consenting for the biopsy procedure will be excluded from this study.

    • Patients unlikely able to hold reasonably still on a procedure table for the length of the procedure.

    • Patients with pacemakers or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators (contraindications to MRI)

    • Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathies.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York United States 11101

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    • Philips Healthcare

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ardeshir Rastinehad, DO, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Associate Professor of Radiology and Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04026763
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • GCO 15-0768
    First Posted:
    Jul 19, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 19, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2019
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Associate Professor of Radiology and Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 19, 2019