Maintenance and Tissues Conditions of Fixed Screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis Versus Implant-Retained Ball Overdentures
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the prosthetic maintenance requirements between implant-retained ball overdentures versus fixed screw- retained implant prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic changes in peri-implant tissue with using PGE2 as a PICF biomarker were also evaluated. Selected patients had been divided into two groups:
-
Group (I): twenty seven patients had received implant-Supported ball over dentures.
-
Group (II): twenty-seven patients had received screw retained restorations Interventions and study procedures
Surgical and prosthetic procedures:
Surgical Procedures A radiopaque radiographic stent was formed and was positioned in the patient's mouth during cone beam scanning. Four implants were planned with two virtual replicas, in the place of the lateral incisor and the second premolar.
The stent was fabricated. After the healing period of four months finished, the patients were recalled and the super structure was fabricated according to the type of restoration Follow-up During the 12 months follow-up period, prosthodontic complications were recorded and calculated.
Postoperative care Along with a conventional oral hygiene assessment and functional checkup, follow up visits were scheduled every 6 months and up to 12 months total follow up period.
Clinical soft tissue measurements which include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and PPD were measured at the mid-facial, mid-lingual, mid-mesial, and mid-distal aspects of each fixture using a graduated plastic probe to the nearest 0.5 mm. These clinical measurements were recorded after prosthesis delivery, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed radiographically after prosthesis delivery, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
• Collection of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples: PICF was collected.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: screw retained restorations
|
Procedure: Screw retained restoration
Hybrid prosthesis
|
| Other: implant-retained ball overdentures
|
Procedure: implant-retained ball overdentures
Removable prosthesis
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Rate of prosthetic complications [12 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- changes in peri-implant tissue with using PGE2 as a PICF biomarker [12 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Completely edentulous patients have Angle Class I maxilla-mandibular relationship.
-
Age range between 40 and 70.
-
Maxillary and mandibular ridges with no history of fresh extraction.
-
Sufficient bone volume to house four implants in each arch.
-
Sufficient zone of keratinized attached mucosa >5mm over the crest of the upper and lower ridges.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
the patients have a past history of head and neck radiation
-
previous ridge augmentation or grafting
-
Lack of any systemic diseases that could affect osseointegration of implants as uncontrolled diabetes , hypertension , and osteoporosis
-
Heavy smokers who exceeding 20 cigarette/ day
-
para-functional habits for example bruxism or clenching.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faculty of Dentistry , Kafrelshiekh university | Kafr El Sheikh | Egypt | 33511 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Kafrelsheikh University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nourhan Ragheb, PhD, Kafrelsheikh University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- KD/02/20