Protein-bound Uremic Retention Solutes and Long Nocturnal Hemodialysis: a Longitudinal Analysis

Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00417339
Collaborator
(none)
38
4
96
9.5
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Study on intradialytic kinetics of protein-bound uremic retention solutes during long nocturnal hemodialysis

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: hemodialysis

Detailed Description

Although remarkable progress has been made, chronic kidney disease still poses a major burden on both individual patients, as well as on society as a whole. There is a strong inverse relationship between decreasing renal function, as estimated by glomerular filtration rate, and mortality rate, especially death due to cardiovascular disease. The exact cause(s) remain to be elucidated. Uremic toxins might play an important role.

In the course of decreasing renal function the concentration of numerous intracellular and extracellular compounds vary from the non-uremic state. A still increasing number of uremic retention solutes are being identified. Renal replacement strategies aim to remove potentially harmful substances from the body. Traditionally much attention has been paid to small water-soluble molecules such as urea nitrogen and creatinine. Based on the results of the recent HEMO and ADEMEX studies, increases of small water-soluble solute removal above the level reached with modern dialysis techniques (HD, PD) seem not to be advantageous with regard to patient outcome. These findings may point to the importance of other distinct groups of uremic retention solutes. In view of the data described above, protein-bound solutes might be good candidates.

Several advantages of long duration hemodialysis have been observed, including a better control of blood pressure by decreasing extracellular fluid volume, lowering peripheral vascular resistance and improving endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. A normalization of heart rate variability and improvement of left-ventricular function was noted as well. Furthermore, anemia control has been shown to be easier and several nutritional parameters improved in patients treated with long duration HD. The therapy results in higher small water-soluble solute removal, phosphate removal and greater elimination of larger molecules (e.g. β2-microglobulin).

It seems an appealing question whether a better control of the serum levels of protein-bound solutes can be achieved by long duration (nocturnal) hemodialysis. This might be another advantage of this therapeutic modality, or may even in part explain the better outcome of patients treated this way.

The study compares intermittent hemodialysis with long nocturnal hemodialysis with respect to serum concentrations of several protein bound uremic toxins, as well as solute removal.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
38 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
A Multicentric Observational Trial on Protein Bound Uremic Toxins in Nocturnal Hemodialysis
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
hemodialysis, 4h, twice weekly

hemodialysis, four hours, twice weekly

Procedure: hemodialysis
individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, twice weekly

hemodialysis, eight hours, twice weekly

Procedure: hemodialysis
individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, every other day

hemodialysis, eight hours, every other day

Procedure: hemodialysis
individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, six days per week

hemodialysis, eight hours, six days per week

Procedure: hemodialysis
individualised

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Start hemodialysis during 2007

    • Age over 18 years

    • Informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Non consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Monash Medical Centre Clayton Victoria Australia 3168
    2 Geelong Hospital Geelong Victoria Australia 3220
    3 Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Leuven Brabant Belgium 3000
    4 Virga Jesseziekenhuis Hasselt Limburg Belgium 3500

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Björn KI Meijers, MD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
    • Study Director: Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
    • Principal Investigator: Tom Dejagere, MD, Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis
    • Principal Investigator: Nigel Toussaint, MD, Geelong Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Björn Meijers, Prof, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00417339
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NHD002
    First Posted:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    May 13, 2016
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Björn Meijers, Prof, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 13, 2016