ECLIPSE: A Study to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis

Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03090100
Collaborator
(none)
1,048
142
2
16.8
7.4
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared with secukinumab for the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The study consists of Screening Phase(4 weeks before administration of study drug),Active Treatment Phase(Week 0-Week 44),Follow Up Phase(Week 44-Week 56).During various study periods,safety assessments(example[e.g] recording of adverse events,Vital signs,Tuberculosis evaluation,Chest radiograph,Urine pregnancy Test);Efficacy assessments(e.g IGA,PASI);Clinical Laboratory Assessments(e.g haematology,chemistry);Biomarkers/Genetic evaluations,will be performed per the study procedures.The primary hypotheses are that guselkumab treatment is non-inferior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48 with noninferiority margin of 10% and,once non-inferiority is established,that guselkumab is superior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1048 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 27, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 2, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 20, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group I: Guselkumab Plus Placebo

Participants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections will be administered to maintain the blind.

Drug: Guselkumab
Participants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44.

Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive 1 injection of placebo at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and 2 injections of placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40.

Active Comparator: Group II: Secukinumab

Participants will receive 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44.

Drug: Secukinumab
Participants will receive 2 injections of active secukinumab at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44.
Other Names:
  • Cosentyx
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48 [Week 48]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Both Week 12 and 48 [Week 12 and 48]

      Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 response at both Week 12 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 12 [Week 12]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Due to failing to achieve superiority of prior secondary endpoint, no formal statistical testing was performed for endpoints from this point onwards.

    3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 12 [Week 12]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-100 Response at Week 48 [Week 48]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 100 response was defined as 100% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    5. Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) at Week 48 [Week 48]

      The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    6. Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 48 [Week 48]

      The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Both Week 16 and 48 [Week 16 and 48]

      Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 response at both Week 16 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 16 [Week 16]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 16 [Week 16]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at All 7 Visits From Week 24 Through Week 48 [Week 24 up to Week 48]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Percentage of participants who achieved a PASI-90 response at all 7 visits from Week 24 to 48 (Week 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48) was reported.

    11. Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 [Week 16]

      The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    12. Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 12 [Week 12]

      The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-75 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-75 Responders at Week 12 [Week 48]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    14. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-90 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-90 Responders at Week 16 [Week 48]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

    15. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Response (PASI 100, PASI-90, PASI-75 and PASI-50) Over Time From Week 1 to Week 56 [Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56]

      PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively.

    16. Percentage of Participants With IGA Responses Through Week 56 [Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56]

      The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    17. Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 56 [Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and Week 56]

      The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without [Psoriatic Arthritis]PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug

    • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at Week 0 and agree to urine pregnancy testing before receiving injections

    • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 3 months after the last administration of study drug

    • Agree not to receive a Bacille Calmette-GuĂ©rin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug

    • Agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during study

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances

    • Has previously received guselkumab or secukinumab

    • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers

    • Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly

    • Is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures because of poor tolerability or lack of easy access to veins

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Alabama Birmingham Birmingham Alabama United States 35233
    2 Southern California Permanente Medical Group Los Angeles California United States 90027
    3 Dermatology Specialists Oceanside California United States 92056
    4 MedDerm Associates San Diego California United States 92103
    5 San Luis Dermatology & Laser Clinic, Inc San Luis Obispo California United States 93405
    6 Southern California Dermatology Santa Ana California United States 92701
    7 Clinical Research Center of Connecticut Danbury Connecticut United States 06810
    8 Olympian Clinical Research Clearwater Florida United States 33757
    9 Florida Academic Dermatology Centers Coral Gables Florida United States 33134
    10 Renstar Medical Research Ocala Florida United States 34470
    11 Park Avenue Dermatology Orange Park Florida United States 32073
    12 Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center Alpharetta Georgia United States 30022
    13 Advanced Medical Research Atlanta Georgia United States 30328
    14 Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research Marietta Georgia United States 30060
    15 Arlington Dermatology Rolling Meadows Illinois United States 60008
    16 Northshore Universite Healthsystem Skokie Illinois United States 60077
    17 Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group Indianapolis Indiana United States 46256
    18 Indiana Clinical Trial Center Plainfield Indiana United States 46168
    19 Dermatology Specialists Louisville Kentucky United States 40241
    20 DermAssociates, PC Rockville Maryland United States 20850
    21 Great Lakes Research Group Bay City Michigan United States 48706
    22 Henry Ford Medical Center Detroit Michigan United States 49202
    23 Hamzavi Dermatology Fort Gratiot Michigan United States 48059
    24 Somerset Skin Centre Troy Michigan United States 48084
    25 Minnesota Clinical Study Center Fridley Minnesota United States 55432
    26 Central Dermatology Saint Louis Missouri United States 63117
    27 Windsor Dermatology East Windsor New Jersey United States 08520-2505
    28 Academic Dermatology Associates Albuquerque New Mexico United States 87106
    29 Dermatology Consulting Services, PLLC High Point North Carolina United States 27262
    30 Dermatologists of Greater Columbus Bexley Ohio United States 43209
    31 The Ohio State University Gahanna Ohio United States 43230
    32 Central Sooner Research Norman Oklahoma United States 73071
    33 Oregon Dermatology and Research Center Portland Oregon United States 97210
    34 Oregon Medical Research Center Portland Oregon United States 97223
    35 University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15213
    36 Clinical Partners Johnston Rhode Island United States 02919
    37 Austin Dermatology Associates Austin Texas United States 78705
    38 Modern Research Associates Dallas Texas United States 75231
    39 Menter Dermatology Research Institute Dallas Texas United States 75246-1615
    40 Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research Houston Texas United States 77056-4132
    41 Progressive Clinical Research San Antonio Texas United States 78213
    42 Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio San Antonio Texas United States 78229
    43 Virginia Clinical Research Norfolk Virginia United States 23322
    44 Dermatology Associates of Seattle Seattle Washington United States 98101-1498
    45 The Skin Centre Benowa Australia 4217
    46 Sinclair Dermatology East Melbourne Australia 3002
    47 Fremantle Dermatology Fremantle Australia 6160
    48 Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd Hectorville Australia 5073
    49 Premier Specialists Kogarah Australia 2217
    50 St George Dermatology & Skin Cancer Centre Kogarah Australia 2217
    51 Skin&Cancer Foundation Inc Melbourne Australia 3053
    52 Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Australia 3050
    53 Westmead Hospital Westmead Australia 2145
    54 Woden Dermatology Woden Australia 2606
    55 Veracity Clinical Research Woolloongabba Australia 4102
    56 Dermatrials Research Hamilton Ontario Canada L8N 1Y2
    57 Guenther Dermatology Research Centre London Ontario Canada N6A 3H7
    58 North Bay Dermatology Centre North Bay Ontario Canada P1B 3Z7
    59 Skin Centre for Dermatology Peterborough Ontario Canada K9J 5K2
    60 Toronto Research Centre Toronto Ontario Canada M3H5Y8
    61 CCA Medical Research Corporation Ajax Canada L1S7K8
    62 Stratica Medical Edmonton Canada T5K 1X3
    63 Eastern Canada Research Associates Halifax Canada B3H 1Z2
    64 DermEdge Research Mississauga Canada L5H 1G9
    65 Innovaderm Research Montreal Canada H2K4L5
    66 Centre Dermatologique Quebec Canada G1V 4X7
    67 Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Surrey Canada V3R 6A7
    68 K. Papp Clinical Research Waterloo Canada N2J 1C4
    69 XLR8 Medical Research Windsor Canada N8W 1E6
    70 Nemocnice Jihlava Jihlava Czechia 586 33
    71 Kozni ambulance Kutna Hora, s.r.o. Kutna Hora Czechia 248 01
    72 DERMAMEDICA s.r.o. Nachod Czechia 547 01
    73 Nemocnice Novy Jicin a.s. Novy Jicin Czechia 741 01
    74 Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava Ostrava- Poruba Czechia 708 52
    75 Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady Praha Czechia 775 20
    76 Dermatologicka ambulance Svitavy Czechia 568 02
    77 Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem Usti Nad Labem Czechia
    78 CHU Bordeaux - Hopital St Andre Bordeaux France 33000
    79 ICH Hopital A. Morvan Brest France 29200
    80 Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis La Rochelle France 17019
    81 Le Bateau Blanc Martigues France 13500
    82 CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu Nantes France 44093
    83 CHU de Nice Hopital de l Archet Nice France 06200
    84 Hopital Charles Nicolle Rouen France 76031
    85 Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France 31000
    86 Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte (CCM) Allergie Center Berlin Germany 10117
    87 ISA GmbH Berlin Germany 10789
    88 Universitatsklinikum Bonn Bonn Germany 53105
    89 Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH Dresden Germany 01069
    90 University Hospital Dresden Dresden Germany 01307
    91 Universitatsklinikum Essen Essen Germany 45122
    92 Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany 60590
    93 Universitaetsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany 20246
    94 SCIderm GmbH Hamburg Germany 20354
    95 MensingDerma research GmbH Hamburg Germany 22391
    96 Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Kiel Kiel Germany 24105
    97 Universitaetsklinik Luebeck Luebeck Germany 23538
    98 Hautarztpraxis Mahlow Germany 15831
    99 Technische Universitaet Muenchen Muenchen Germany 80802
    100 Universitaetsklinikum Muenster Muenster Germany 48149
    101 Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany 72076
    102 Centrovital Witten Germany 58453
    103 Semmelweis Egyetem Budapest Hungary 1085
    104 Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont Debrecen Hungary 4032
    105 Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktatokorhaz Kaposvar Hungary 7400
    106 Bacs-kiskun Megyei Korhaz Kecskemet Hungary 6000
    107 Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz Miskolc Hungary 3529
    108 Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Pecs Hungary 7632
    109 Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Szeged Hungary 6720
    110 Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz Szombathely Hungary 9700
    111 Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt. Veszprem Hungary 8200
    112 NZOZ Osteo-Medic S.C. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik Bialystok Poland 15-351
    113 Specderm Poznańska sp. j. Bialystok Poland 15-375
    114 Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza Bydgoszcz Poland 85-094
    115 Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze Elblag Poland 82-300
    116 Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o.o Gdansk Poland 80-298
    117 Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne Krakow Poland 30-510
    118 Centrum Badawcze Wspolczesnej Terapii Lodz Poland 90-242
    119 Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o Lodz Poland 90-265
    120 Solumed S.C. Poznan Poland 60-529
    121 CRC Sp. z o.o. Poznan Poland 60-848
    122 Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne Swidnik Poland 21-040
    123 NZOZ Poradnia Dermatologiczno-Wenerologiczna Mediderm Torun Poland 87-100
    124 Przychodnia Specjalistyczna High-Med Warszawa Poland 01-817
    125 Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny Warszawa Poland 04-141
    126 DermMedica Sp. z o.o. Wroclaw Poland 51-318
    127 Centrum Medyczne WroMedica Wroclaw Poland 51-685
    128 Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon Alcorcon Spain 28922
    129 Hosp. Gral. Univ. de Alicante Alicante Spain 03010
    130 Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol Badalona Spain 08916
    131 Hosp. Univ. de Cruces Barakaldo Spain 48903
    132 Hosp. Del Mar Barcelona Spain 08003
    133 Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau Barcelona Spain 8041
    134 Hosp. Univ. de Basurto Bilbao Vizcaya Spain 48009
    135 Hosp. Reina Sofia Cordoba Spain 14004
    136 Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain 28031
    137 Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain 28041
    138 Hosp. Univ. La Paz Madrid Spain 28046
    139 Hosp. Univ. de Torrejon Madrid Spain 28850
    140 Hosp. de Manises Manises Spain 46940
    141 Hosp. Provincial de Pontevedra Pontevedra Spain 36003
    142 Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe Valencia Spain 046026

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03090100
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CR108278
    • 2016-002995-29
    • CNTO1959PSO3009
    First Posted:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2019
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail Out of total 1,048 randomized participants, 534 were assigned to receive Guselkumab + Placebo and 514 subjects were assigned to receive Secukinumab.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 534 514
    Treated 534 511
    COMPLETED 507 466
    NOT COMPLETED 27 48

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 534 514 1048
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    6
    1.1%
    2
    0.4%
    8
    0.8%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    474
    88.8%
    467
    90.9%
    941
    89.8%
    >=65 years
    54
    10.1%
    45
    8.8%
    99
    9.4%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    46.3
    (13.67)
    45.3
    (13.57)
    45.8
    (13.63)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    169
    31.6%
    172
    33.5%
    341
    32.5%
    Male
    365
    68.4%
    342
    66.5%
    707
    67.5%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    27
    5.1%
    36
    7%
    63
    6%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    502
    94%
    472
    91.8%
    974
    92.9%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    5
    0.9%
    6
    1.2%
    11
    1%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    2
    0.4%
    2
    0.4%
    4
    0.4%
    Asian
    18
    3.4%
    12
    2.3%
    30
    2.9%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    3
    0.6%
    3
    0.3%
    Black or African American
    5
    0.9%
    11
    2.1%
    16
    1.5%
    White
    499
    93.4%
    480
    93.4%
    979
    93.4%
    More than one race
    4
    0.7%
    0
    0%
    4
    0.4%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    6
    1.1%
    6
    1.2%
    12
    1.1%
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    AUSTRALIA
    35
    6.6%
    36
    7%
    71
    6.8%
    CANADA
    81
    15.2%
    77
    15%
    158
    15.1%
    CZECH REPUBLIC
    27
    5.1%
    28
    5.4%
    55
    5.2%
    FRANCE
    28
    5.2%
    30
    5.8%
    58
    5.5%
    GERMANY
    66
    12.4%
    56
    10.9%
    122
    11.6%
    HUNGARY
    25
    4.7%
    20
    3.9%
    45
    4.3%
    POLAND
    119
    22.3%
    119
    23.2%
    238
    22.7%
    SPAIN
    35
    6.6%
    33
    6.4%
    68
    6.5%
    UNITED STATES
    118
    22.1%
    115
    22.4%
    233
    22.2%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria (who discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or adverse event of psoriasis and/or who initiated protocol-prohibited psoriasis medications/therapies) prior to Week 48 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 48 were considered PASI 90 non-responders at Week 48.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    84.5
    15.8%
    70.0
    13.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
    Comments Non-inferiority margin of 10%
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method z-test
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 14.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    9.2 to 19.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Both Week 12 and 48
    Description Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 response at both Week 12 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 12 and 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria (who discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or adverse event of psoriasis and/or who initiated protocol-prohibited psoriasis medications/therapies) prior to Week 48 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 12 or 48 were considered as non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    84.6
    15.8%
    80.2
    15.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
    Comments Non-inferiority margin of 10%
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method z-test
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 4.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.2 to 8.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.062
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 12
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Due to failing to achieve superiority of prior secondary endpoint, no formal statistical testing was performed for endpoints from this point onwards.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 12, who had a missing PASI score at Week 12 were considered PASI 90 non-responders at Week 12.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    69.1
    12.9%
    76.1
    14.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -7.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -12.2 to -1.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 12
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 12 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 12 were considered PASI 75 non-responders at Week 12.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    89.3
    16.7%
    91.6
    17.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -2.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -6.0 to 1.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-100 Response at Week 48
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 100 response was defined as 100% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 48 were considered PASI 100 non-responders at Week 48.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    58.2
    10.9%
    48.4
    9.4%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 9.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.8 to 15.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) at Week 48
    Description The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had a missing IGA score at Week 48 were considered IGA cleared (0) non-responders at Week 48.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    62.2
    11.6%
    50.4
    9.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 11.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    5.8 to 17.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 48
    Description The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had a missing IGA score at Week 48 were considered IGA cleared (0) or minimal (1) non-responders at Week 48.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    85.0
    15.9%
    74.9
    14.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 9.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    4.9 to 14.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Both Week 16 and 48
    Description Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 response at both Week 16 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 16 and 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 16 or 48 were considered as non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    72.3
    13.5%
    64.4
    12.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 7.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    2.3 to 13.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 16
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 16 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 16 were considered PASI 75 non-responders at Week 16.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    92.7
    17.4%
    92.8
    18.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -0.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -3.5 to 3.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 16
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 16 or who had a missing PASI score at Week 16 were considered PASI 90 non-responders at Week 16.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    78.5
    14.7%
    79.6
    15.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -1.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -6.2 to 3.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at All 7 Visits From Week 24 Through Week 48
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Percentage of participants who achieved a PASI-90 response at all 7 visits from Week 24 to 48 (Week 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48) was reported.
    Time Frame Week 24 up to Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS population included. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had missing PASI score at any visit from Week 24 through 48 were considered as non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    71.0
    13.3%
    61.5
    12%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 9.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    4.2 to 15.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
    Description The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
    Time Frame Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 16 or who had a missing IGA score at Week 16 were considered non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    86.7
    16.2%
    86.6
    16.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -0.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -4.2 to 3.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 12
    Description The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 12 or who had a missing IGA score at Week 12 were considered non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    85.6
    16%
    86.4
    16.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo, Secukinumab 300 mg
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value -0.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.0 to 3.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-75 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-75 Responders at Week 12
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0 and who achieved PASI 75 response at Week 12. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had missing PASI score at Week 48 were considered as non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 477 471
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    94.8
    17.8%
    87.5
    17%
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-90 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-90 Responders at Week 16
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.
    Time Frame Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0 and who achieved PASI-90 response at Week 16. Participants who met treatment failure criteria prior to Week 48 or who had missing PASI score at Week 48 were considered as non-responders for this endpoint.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 419 409
    Number [Percentage of participants]
    92.1
    17.2%
    80.9
    15.7%
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Response (PASI 100, PASI-90, PASI-75 and PASI-50) Over Time From Week 1 to Week 56
    Description PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively.
    Time Frame Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria or who had missing PASI score were considered as non-responders for the specific visit.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Week 1: 100% improvement
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Week 1: >=90% improvement
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Week 1: >=75% improvement
    2.1
    0.4%
    1.8
    0.4%
    Week 1: >=50% improvement
    10.7
    2%
    12.8
    2.5%
    Week 2: 100% improvement
    0.2
    0%
    0.6
    0.1%
    Week 2: >=90% improvement
    1.1
    0.2%
    2.7
    0.5%
    Week 2: >=75% improvement
    6.4
    1.2%
    11.5
    2.2%
    Week 2: >=50% improvement
    30.9
    5.8%
    42.0
    8.2%
    Week 3: 100% improvement
    1.7
    0.3%
    1.6
    0.3%
    Week 3: >=90% improvement
    5.6
    1%
    8.6
    1.7%
    Week 3: >=75% improvement
    19.5
    3.7%
    28.4
    5.5%
    Week 3: >=50% improvement
    56.4
    10.6%
    66.9
    13%
    Week 4: 100% improvement
    4.1
    0.8%
    5.1
    1%
    Week 4: >=90% improvement
    13.1
    2.5%
    21.8
    4.2%
    Week 4: >=75% improvement
    39.3
    7.4%
    50.2
    9.8%
    Week 4: >=50% improvement
    73.4
    13.7%
    85.4
    16.6%
    Week 8: 100% improvement
    20.0
    3.7%
    27.2
    5.3%
    Week 8: >=90% improvement
    48.7
    9.1%
    62.1
    12.1%
    Week 8: >=75% improvement
    76.4
    14.3%
    86.2
    16.8%
    Week 8: >=50% improvement
    95.3
    17.8%
    96.9
    18.9%
    Week 12: 100% improvement
    37.8
    7.1%
    42.0
    8.2%
    Week 12: >=90% improvement
    69.1
    12.9%
    76.1
    14.8%
    Week 12: >=75% improvement
    89.3
    16.7%
    91.6
    17.8%
    Week 12: >=50% improvement
    96.8
    18.1%
    96.1
    18.7%
    Week 16: 100% improvement
    47.8
    9%
    46.1
    9%
    Week 16: >=90% improvement
    78.5
    14.7%
    79.6
    15.5%
    Week 16: >=75% improvement
    92.7
    17.4%
    92.8
    18.1%
    Week 16: >=50% improvement
    97.6
    18.3%
    96.3
    18.7%
    Week 20: 100% improvement
    51.3
    9.6%
    48.6
    9.5%
    Week 20: >=90% improvement
    80.1
    15%
    81.1
    15.8%
    Week 20: >=75% improvement
    93.6
    17.5%
    92.4
    18%
    Week 20: >=50% improvement
    97.6
    18.3%
    95.1
    18.5%
    Week 24: 100% improvement
    54.7
    10.2%
    50.4
    9.8%
    Week 24: >=90% improvement
    83.1
    15.6%
    78.2
    15.2%
    Week 24: >=75% improvement
    94.2
    17.6%
    90.3
    17.6%
    Week 24: >=50% improvement
    97.8
    18.3%
    93.0
    18.1%
    Week 28: 100% improvement
    57.1
    10.7%
    51.0
    9.9%
    Week 28: >=90% improvement
    85.4
    16%
    77.2
    15%
    Week 28: >=75% improvement
    94.0
    17.6%
    90.3
    17.6%
    Week 28: >=50% improvement
    97.2
    18.2%
    93.0
    18.1%
    Week 32: 100% improvement
    57.5
    10.8%
    50.2
    9.8%
    Week 32:>=90 % improvement
    84.8
    15.9%
    77.4
    15.1%
    Week 32: >=75% improvement
    94.0
    17.6%
    89.3
    17.4%
    Week 32: >=50% improvement
    97.0
    18.2%
    93.0
    18.1%
    Week 36: 100% improvement
    58.6
    11%
    50.0
    9.7%
    Week 36: >=90% improvement
    84.5
    15.8%
    75.7
    14.7%
    Week 36: >=75% improvement
    93.6
    17.5%
    87.0
    16.9%
    Week 36: >=50% improvement
    97.2
    18.2%
    92.2
    17.9%
    Week 40: 100% improvement
    58.2
    10.9%
    48.6
    9.5%
    Week 40: >=90% improvement
    84.6
    15.8%
    73.7
    14.3%
    Week 40: >=75% improvement
    92.9
    17.4%
    85.8
    16.7%
    Week 40: >=50% improvement
    95.9
    18%
    90.9
    17.7%
    Week 44: 100% improvement
    58.6
    11%
    49.4
    9.6%
    Week 44: >=90% improvement
    84.1
    15.7%
    72.6
    14.1%
    Week 44: >=75% improvement
    92.3
    17.3%
    85.2
    16.6%
    Week 44: >=50% improvement
    94.2
    17.6%
    91.4
    17.8%
    Week 48: 100% improvement
    58.2
    10.9%
    48.4
    9.4%
    Week 48: >=90% improvement
    84.5
    15.8%
    70.0
    13.6%
    Week 48: >=75% improvement
    92.1
    17.2%
    83.5
    16.2%
    Week 48: >=50% improvement
    94.0
    17.6%
    89.3
    17.4%
    Week 56: 100% improvement
    50.4
    9.4%
    27.0
    5.3%
    Week 56: >=90% improvement
    77.3
    14.5%
    51.4
    10%
    Week 56: >=75% improvement
    88.0
    16.5%
    70.4
    13.7%
    Week 56: >=50% improvement
    91.0
    17%
    82.1
    16%
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With IGA Responses Through Week 56
    Description The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
    Time Frame Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Participants who met treatment failure criteria or who had missing IGA score were considered as non-responders for the specific visit.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Week 1: cleared (0)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Week 1: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    3.4
    0.6%
    2.5
    0.5%
    Week 1: mild or better (=<2)
    27.2
    5.1%
    34.2
    6.7%
    Week 2: cleared (0)
    0.2
    0%
    0.8
    0.2%
    Week 2: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    12.4
    2.3%
    20.2
    3.9%
    Week 2: mild or better (=<2)
    54.1
    10.1%
    63.8
    12.4%
    Week 3: cleared (0)
    2.6
    0.5%
    3.3
    0.6%
    Week 3: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    27.2
    5.1%
    39.9
    7.8%
    Week 3: mild or better (=<2)
    75.3
    14.1%
    82.5
    16.1%
    Week 4: cleared (0)
    6.7
    1.3%
    9.7
    1.9%
    Week 4: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    44.2
    8.3%
    59.3
    11.5%
    Week 4: mild or better (=<2)
    85.6
    16%
    92.2
    17.9%
    Week 8: cleared (0)
    29.2
    5.5%
    35.8
    7%
    Week 8: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    76.6
    14.3%
    83.5
    16.2%
    Week 8: mild or better (=<2)
    96.3
    18%
    96.3
    18.7%
    Week 12: cleared (0)
    46.3
    8.7%
    50.2
    9.8%
    Week 12: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    85.6
    16%
    86.4
    16.8%
    Week 12: mild or better (=<2)
    96.8
    18.1%
    95.3
    18.5%
    Week 16: cleared (0)
    55.4
    10.4%
    53.5
    10.4%
    Week 16: mild or better (=<2)
    96.8
    18.1%
    94.7
    18.4%
    Week 16: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    86.7
    16.2%
    86.6
    16.8%
    Week 20: cleared (0)
    56.9
    10.7%
    53.9
    10.5%
    Week 20: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    87.8
    16.4%
    85.6
    16.7%
    Week 20: mild or better (=<2)
    95.3
    17.8%
    93.2
    18.1%
    Week 24: cleared (0)
    61.0
    11.4%
    56.0
    10.9%
    Week 24: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    88.6
    16.6%
    82.7
    16.1%
    Week 24: mild or better (=<2)
    96.3
    18%
    91.6
    17.8%
    Week 28: cleared (0)
    62.2
    11.6%
    56.2
    10.9%
    Week 28: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    87.8
    16.4%
    82.9
    16.1%
    Week 28: mild or better (<=2)
    95.5
    17.9%
    90.9
    17.7%
    Week 32: cleared (0)
    63.1
    11.8%
    54.5
    10.6%
    Week 32: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    88.6
    16.6%
    81.5
    15.9%
    Week 32: mild or better (=<2)
    95.5
    17.9%
    90.5
    17.6%
    Week 36: cleared (0)
    60.7
    11.4%
    53.7
    10.4%
    Week 36: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    86.5
    16.2%
    79.6
    15.5%
    Week 36: mild or better (=<2)
    95.5
    17.9%
    88.9
    17.3%
    Week 40: cleared (0)
    63.1
    11.8%
    52.3
    10.2%
    Week 40: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    86.3
    16.2%
    78.0
    15.2%
    Week 40: mild or better (=<2)
    93.6
    17.5%
    87.9
    17.1%
    Week 44: cleared (0)
    62.2
    11.6%
    51.9
    10.1%
    Week 44: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    86.0
    16.1%
    76.5
    14.9%
    Week 44: mild or better (=<2)
    92.3
    17.3%
    87.5
    17%
    Week 48: cleared (0)
    62.2
    11.6%
    50.4
    9.8%
    Week 48: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    85.0
    15.9%
    74.9
    14.6%
    Week 48: mild or better (=<2)
    92.7
    17.4%
    86.8
    16.9%
    Week 56: cleared (0)
    54.3
    10.2%
    29.4
    5.7%
    Week 56: cleared (0) or minimal (1)
    78.8
    14.8%
    58.2
    11.3%
    Week 56: mild or better (=<2)
    87.5
    16.4%
    76.3
    14.8%
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 56
    Description The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
    Time Frame Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and Week 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all the participants randomized at Week 0. Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at specified point. Zero percent improvement was assigned from the point when participants met treatment failure criteria and no other data imputation was applied.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    Measure Participants 534 514
    Week 1
    20.30
    (20.743)
    24.72
    (20.711)
    Week 2
    37.85
    (23.567)
    44.56
    (23.600)
    Week 3
    52.76
    (24.186)
    60.57
    (21.871)
    Week 4
    64.63
    (22.862)
    72.80
    (19.478)
    Week 8
    84.36
    (17.278)
    89.40
    (13.579)
    Week 12
    90.85
    (14.484)
    92.60
    (13.703)
    Week 16
    93.65
    (12.849)
    93.94
    (12.123)
    Week 20
    94.35
    (11.525)
    94.41
    (12.152)
    Week 24
    95.27
    (9.848)
    93.75
    (14.314)
    Week 28
    95.58
    (9.663)
    92.96
    (16.835)
    Week 32
    95.74
    (9.336)
    92.95
    (16.641)
    Week 36
    95.45
    (11.119)
    92.40
    (17.125)
    Week 40
    95.78
    (10.456)
    91.77
    (17.733)
    Week 44
    95.45
    (12.293)
    91.34
    (18.246)
    Week 48
    95.76
    (11.629)
    90.87
    (19.181)
    Week 56
    93.35
    (16.116)
    81.67
    (27.627)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Up to Week 56
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Safety analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent (partial or complete) at Week 0 according to the actual treatment received during the study.
    Arm/Group Title Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections were administered to maintain the blind. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56. Participants received 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44. Participants were continued to follow-up period from Week 44 through Week 56.
    All Cause Mortality
    Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/534 (0%) 0/511 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 33/534 (6.2%) 37/511 (7.2%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial Fibrillation 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Atrioventricular Block Complete 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Cardiac Failure Congestive 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Coronary Artery Occlusion 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Macular Fibrosis 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Crohn's Disease 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Haemorrhoids 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Leukoplakia Oral 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Umbilical Hernia 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    General disorders
    Chest Pain 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Exercise Tolerance Decreased 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    General Physical Health Deterioration 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Non-Cardiac Chest Pain 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholecystitis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Cholecystitis Acute 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Cholelithiasis 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Drug-Induced Liver Injury 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Immune system disorders
    Anaphylactoid Reaction 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Infections and infestations
    Abscess Limb 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Appendicitis 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Cellulitis 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Labyrinthitis 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Neuroborreliosis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Pneumonia 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Pyelonephritis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Clavicle Fracture 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Femoral Neck Fracture 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Foot Fracture 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Ligament Rupture 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Meniscus Injury 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Skull Fracture 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Tendon Rupture 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Upper Limb Fracture 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Investigations
    Electrocardiogram Repolarisation Abnormality 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Intervertebral Disc Protrusion 0/534 (0%) 2/511 (0.4%)
    Osteoarthritis 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Rotator Cuff Syndrome 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Spinal Column Stenosis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Spinal Osteoarthritis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular Accident 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Headache 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Syncope 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Depression 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Mixed Anxiety and Depressive Disorder 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute Kidney Injury 1/534 (0.2%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Nephrolithiasis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Bartholin's Cyst 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Endometriosis 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Prostatomegaly 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Interstitial Lung Disease 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Nasal Cyst 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Nasal Polyps 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Pneumonia Aspiration 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Pulmonary Embolism 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Drug Eruption 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Psoriasis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Rash Morbilliform 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Finger Amputation 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Vascular disorders
    Arteriosclerosis 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Deep Vein Thrombosis 0/534 (0%) 1/511 (0.2%)
    Hypotension 1/534 (0.2%) 0/511 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Guselkumab 100 mg + Placebo Secukinumab 300 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 249/534 (46.6%) 254/511 (49.7%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea 27/534 (5.1%) 20/511 (3.9%)
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis 118/534 (22.1%) 125/511 (24.5%)
    Upper Respiratory Tract Infection 83/534 (15.5%) 92/511 (18%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 30/534 (5.6%) 25/511 (4.9%)
    Back Pain 29/534 (5.4%) 18/511 (3.5%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 48/534 (9%) 48/511 (9.4%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Director
    Organization Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    Phone 844-434-4210
    Email ClinicalTrialDisclosure@its.jnj.com
    Responsible Party:
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03090100
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CR108278
    • 2016-002995-29
    • CNTO1959PSO3009
    First Posted:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2019