A 12-Day Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle and Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Six Concentrations of Topical E6201 Gel in Subjects With Psoriasis Vulgaris

Sponsor
Eisai Limited (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01268527
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
8.9
3.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and the concentration/response relationship of E6201 in subjects with psoriasis vulgaris.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 0.03% E6201
  • Drug: 0.1% E6201
  • Drug: 0.2% E6201
  • Drug: 0.005% E6201
  • Drug: 0.01% E6201
  • Drug: 0.05% E6201
  • Other: Placebo - 0.03% gel vehicle
  • Other: Placebo - 0.1% gel vehicle
  • Other: Placebo - 0.2% gel vehicle
  • Other: Placebo - 0.05% gel vehicle
  • Other: Placebo - 0.01% gel vehicle
  • Other: Placebo - 0.05% gel vehicle
  • Drug: Calcipotriene
Phase 2

Detailed Description

This is a single center, randomized, blinded, intra-individual comparison in two sequential cohorts of 15 subjects each (30 subjects in total) in an outpatient setting, in which each subject simultaneously receives five topical treatments (3 active, 1 vehicle, and 1 positive control) within one or two psoriatic plaques. Treatments consisted of 3 concentrations of E6201 gel, a negative control (gel vehicle), and a positive control (0.005% calcipotriene cream). The different concentrations of E6201 gel and vehicle control were double-blinded, while the calciprotriene cream was single-blinded. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A 12-Day Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle and Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Six Concentrations of Topical E6201 Gel in Subjects With Psoriasis Vulgaris
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 15, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 11, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 11, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1

Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.2%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. The 3 concentrations of E6201 gel were dosed first in Cohort 1 to establish the safety and tolerability prior to dosing in Cohort 2.

Drug: 0.03% E6201
Topical 0.03% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Drug: 0.1% E6201
Topical 0.1% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Drug: 0.2% E6201
Topical 0.2% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Other: Placebo - 0.03% gel vehicle
Topical 0.03% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Other: Placebo - 0.1% gel vehicle
Topical 0.1% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Other: Placebo - 0.2% gel vehicle
Topical 0.2% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

Drug: Calcipotriene
Topical 0.005% calcipotriene (positive control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.
Other Names:
  • Daivonex
  • Experimental: Cohort 2

    Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.05%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated.

    Drug: 0.005% E6201
    Topical 0.005% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Drug: 0.01% E6201
    Topical 0.01% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Drug: 0.05% E6201
    Topical 0.05% E6201 gel was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Other: Placebo - 0.05% gel vehicle
    Topical 0.005% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Other: Placebo - 0.01% gel vehicle
    Topical 0.01% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Other: Placebo - 0.05% gel vehicle
    Topical 0.05% gel vehicle (negative control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.

    Drug: Calcipotriene
    Topical 0.005% calcipotriene (positive control) was applied once daily to individual specific regions of the psoriatic plaque.
    Other Names:
  • Daivonex
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Summary Statistics and Primary Pairwise Comparison (Vehicle-E6201) of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Baseline-Corrected Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate [Day 0 (Baseline), Day 8 (Visit 10), and Day 12 (End of Treatment)]

      The AUC was based on the baseline-corrected thickness of the psoriatic infiltrate (20 megahertz (MHz) Sonographic measurement) at specified days for each treatment field calculated by applying the linear trapezoidal rule. Sonographic measurements were performed using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial A-scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore, exact measurement of skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent band below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. The thickness was measured in micrometers (um) and was denoted as T.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to End of Treatment (Day 12/Discontinuation) [Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)]

      Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). Least Squares Means (LSM) and Confidence Intervals (CI) were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.

    2. Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to Day 8 [Day 8 (Visit 10)]

      Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). LSM and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.

    3. Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation [Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)]

      Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).

    4. Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8 [Day 8 (Visit 10)]

      Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).

    5. Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.]

      TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment (baseline), or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Safety variables included TEAEs including skin reactions, diascopy and biopsy findings, clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, and physical examinations. For Cohort 2, special attention was given to a close, daily monitoring of the application site for signs of skin irritation. Any suspected ecchymoses or petechiae were to be followed up with a diascopy test that was to be documented with digital photographs. Any positive diascopy test was to be followed up by biopsy for skin ultrastructural analysis (if agreed to by the participant, sponsor, and investigator). Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion:
    • Chronic stable plaque psoriasis with one or two stable psoriatic plaques(s) suitable in size and location for five separate treatment fields to be assessed within it.

    • Males and females aged between 18 and 75 years of age

    • The general physical examination should be normal (excluding the skin examination for psoriasis) unless the Investigator considers an abnormality not to be clinically significant with regard to the study

    • Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin at Visit 1 (Screening) and a negative urine pregnancy test prior to starting study drug(s) (Visit 2). Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or to use a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

    • Provide written informed consent

    • Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

    Exclusion:
    • Any clinically significant skin diseases other then chronic stable plaque psoriasis

    • Other types of psoriasis than chronic stable plaque variant eg, guttate, pustular, erythodermic, etc

    • An unstable course of the disease defined as flare(s) in the previous month

    • Subjects who used any concommitant topical treatment for the psoriatic plaque(s) to be studied (other than emollients or salicylic acid) within 8 weeks before the Baseline visit eg corticosteroids or topical immunomodulators, anthralin (dithranil), vitamin D derivatives, ultraviolet-light therapy including sunbathing , or retinoids.

    • Subjects who used any of the following systemic treatments within 12 weeks before the Baseline visit eg: corticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone analogs, retinoids such as acitretin or isotretinoin, cyclosporin, interferon, methotrexate, other immuno-suppressive/immunomodulating drugs, psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy, or biologics

    • Subjects planning on significant exposure to sun (sun-bathing)

    • Treatment with systemic or locally acting medications which might counter or influence the study aim (eg monoamine oxidase inhibitors, anti-epileptic drugs, anti-psychotic drugs) or medications which are known to provoke or aggravate psoriasis, eg Beta-blockers, antimalarial drugs, and lithium within two weeks before the Baseline visit

    • Subject is a dependent person, ie, a relative/family member of the Investigator and/or is a member of the Investigator's staff

    • Clinical study participation with any investigational drug less than 30 days prior to study entry or planning to receive an investigational drug during the study period

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Bioskin GmbH Berlin Germany

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Eisai Limited

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Joseph Mercer, Eisai Limited

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Eisai Limited
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01268527
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • E6201-E044-204
    • 2009-014815-11
    First Posted:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 11, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021
    Keywords provided by Eisai Limited
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Cohort 1 Cohort 2
    Arm/Group Description Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.2%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using separate tuberculin syringes that were filled with approximately 200 uL of each concentration of study treatment and comparator. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. The 3 concentrations of E6201 gel were dosed first in Cohort 1 to establish the safety and tolerability prior to dosing in Cohort 2. Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.05%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described for Cohort 1. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 15 15
    COMPLETED 15 15
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Total
    Arm/Group Description Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.2%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using separate tuberculin syringes that were filled with approximately 200 uL of each concentration of study treatment and comparator. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. The 3 concentrations of E6201 gel were dosed first in Cohort 1 to establish the safety and tolerability prior to dosing in Cohort 2. Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.05%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described for Cohort 1. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 15 15 30
    Age (Years) [Geometric Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Geometric Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    47.4
    (12.44)
    50.6
    (7.01)
    49.0
    (10.05)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    2
    13.3%
    3
    20%
    5
    16.7%
    Male
    13
    86.7%
    12
    80%
    25
    83.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Summary Statistics and Primary Pairwise Comparison (Vehicle-E6201) of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Baseline-Corrected Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate
    Description The AUC was based on the baseline-corrected thickness of the psoriatic infiltrate (20 megahertz (MHz) Sonographic measurement) at specified days for each treatment field calculated by applying the linear trapezoidal rule. Sonographic measurements were performed using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial A-scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore, exact measurement of skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent band below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. The thickness was measured in micrometers (um) and was denoted as T.
    Time Frame Day 0 (Baseline), Day 8 (Visit 10), and Day 12 (End of Treatment)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [um.day]
    -1449.2
    17.0
    -694.4
    -1102.8
    -763.1
    -1758.2
    -904.4
    -920.8
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.005% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, Least Squares Means (LSM), and Confidence Intervals (CI) were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0038
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 711.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    292.5 to 1130.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.01% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 1119.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    858.9 to 1380.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.03% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0523
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 780.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -8.5 to 1568.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.05% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 1775.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1392.3 to 2158.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.1% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 921.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    515.7 to 1327.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0115
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 937.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    267.6 to 1607.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to End of Treatment (Day 12/Discontinuation)
    Description Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). Least Squares Means (LSM) and Confidence Intervals (CI) were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Time Frame Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201-vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [um]
    -205.3
    7.1
    -94.4
    -175.3
    -162.4
    -239.5
    -125.2
    -137.9
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.005% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0042
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 101.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    36.0 to 167.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.01% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 182.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    140.3 to 224.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.03% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 169.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    127.4 to 211.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.05% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 246.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    185.0 to 308.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.1% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0043
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 132.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    53.9 to 210.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM) and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0036
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 145.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    64.2 to 225.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to Day 8
    Description Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). LSM and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Time Frame Day 8 (Visit 10)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201-vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [um]
    -151.7
    17.3
    -63.4
    -110.7
    -92.9
    -190.3
    -108.0
    -102.7
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.005% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0013
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 80.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    34.6 to 126.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.01% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 127.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    92.4 to 163.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.03% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0458
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 110.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    2.4 to 218.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.05% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 207.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    155.2 to 259.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.1% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0003
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 125.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    71.5 to 179.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection E6201 Vehicle, 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Comments The following hypotheses were based on the Full Analysis Population: null Hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. P values, LSM, and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0029
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in LSM (vehicle - E6201 gel)
    Estimated Value 128.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    93.9 to 163.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
    Description Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).
    Time Frame Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201-vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    Worsened
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Unchanged (no effect)
    6.7
    44.7%
    90.0
    600%
    20.0
    66.7%
    0
    NaN
    6.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Slight improvement
    56.7
    378%
    10.0
    66.7%
    66.7
    222.3%
    33.3
    NaN
    46.7
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    83.3
    NaN
    83.3
    NaN
    Clear improvement but not completely healed
    33.3
    222%
    0
    0%
    13.3
    44.3%
    66.7
    NaN
    46.7
    NaN
    86.7
    NaN
    16.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Completely healed
    3.3
    22%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    16.7
    NaN
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
    Description Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).
    Time Frame Day 8 (Visit 10)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201-vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    Worsened
    3.3
    22%
    3.3
    22%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    6.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Unchanged (no effect)
    20.0
    133.3%
    90.0
    600%
    33.3
    111%
    6.7
    NaN
    6.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    16.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Slight improvement
    46.7
    311.3%
    6.7
    44.7%
    66.7
    222.3%
    53.3
    NaN
    60.0
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    83.3
    NaN
    100
    NaN
    Clear improvement but not completely healed
    30.0
    200%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    40.0
    NaN
    26.7
    NaN
    86.7
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Completely healed
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
    Description TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment (baseline), or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Safety variables included TEAEs including skin reactions, diascopy and biopsy findings, clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, and physical examinations. For Cohort 2, special attention was given to a close, daily monitoring of the application site for signs of skin irritation. Any suspected ecchymoses or petechiae were to be followed up with a diascopy test that was to be documented with digital photographs. Any positive diascopy test was to be followed up by biopsy for skin ultrastructural analysis (if agreed to by the participant, sponsor, and investigator). Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
    Time Frame From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postdose safety assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    Measure Participants 30 30 15 15 15 15 6 6
    TEAEs
    3
    20%
    1
    6.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    4
    NaN
    5
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    Treatment-related TEAEs
    3
    20%
    1
    6.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    4
    NaN
    5
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    6
    NaN
    Severe TEAEs
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Serious TEAEs
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    TEAEs leading to study treatment withdrawal
    1
    6.7%
    1
    6.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    1
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    TEAEs leading to study treatment dose decrease
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    TEAEs leading to study treatment interruption
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
    Arm/Group Title Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Arm/Group Description Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier. E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
    All Cause Mortality
    Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/6 (0%) 0/6 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/6 (0%) 0/6 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream) E6201 Vehicle 0.005% E6201 Gel 0.01% E6201 Gel 0.03% E6201 Gel 0.05% E6201 Gel 0.1% E6201 Gel 0.2% E6201 Gel
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 3/30 (10%) 1/30 (3.3%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 4/15 (26.7%) 5/15 (33.3%) 6/6 (100%) 6/6 (100%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Pain in extremity 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/6 (16.7%) 1/6 (16.7%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash erythematous 2/30 (6.7%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 2/15 (13.3%) 0/15 (0%) 5/6 (83.3%) 4/6 (66.7%)
    Erythema 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 5/15 (33.3%) 0/6 (0%) 0/6 (0%)
    Scab 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 3/6 (50%) 5/6 (83.3%)
    Lividity 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/15 (0%) 1/6 (16.7%) 2/6 (33.3%)
    Dermatitis contact 1/30 (3.3%) 1/30 (3.3%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/15 (0%) 0/6 (0%) 0/6 (0%)
    Skin erosion 1/30 (3.3%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 1/15 (6.7%) 0/15 (0%) 1/6 (16.7%) 0/6 (0%)
    Skin haemorrhage 0/30 (0%) 0/30 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%) 0/6 (0%) 1/6 (16.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Eisai Medical Information
    Organization Eisai Medical Research Inc.
    Phone 1-888-274-2378
    Email esi_medinfo@eisai.com
    Responsible Party:
    Eisai Limited
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01268527
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • E6201-E044-204
    • 2009-014815-11
    First Posted:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 11, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021