Psychological Mobile Interventions to Reduce Distress

Sponsor
Babes-Bolyai University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05294809
Collaborator
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Other)
430
1
3
6.8
63.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Investigating the effectiveness of two mobile psychological interventions and the mechanisms of change involved in reducing the symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, on an adult population with a mild to moderate level of symptoms (sub-clinical).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: PsyPills
  • Behavioral: Online-Contingent Attention Training, OCAT
  • Behavioral: shamOCAT
N/A

Detailed Description

The research design will be a 3-arm controlled clinical trial, with 4 waves of data collection. Once selected using a symptomatic screening questionnaire, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 2 experimental conditions (PsyPills and OCAT) and an active control group (shamOCAT).

Measurements will be collected before allocation (baseline), during the intervention (through a momentary ecological assessment paradigm), at the end (post) and at an interval of one month after the intervention (follow-up). Among the constructs evaluated are symptomatic level, affectivity, cognitive processes, emotional regulation and attentional bias. All measurement steps will be collected online.

The interventions consist of an attentional training (Online-Contingent Attention Training, OCAT) which seeks to facilitate the disengagement from the negative content and the engagement on the positive of some personally relevant information by providing instructions and feedback on performance; and prescribing personalized rational thinking strategies to change the intensity of dysfunctional emotionality (PsyPills). The active control group consists of a "fake" version of OCAT (shamOCAT), by offering the same attentional training, without training and feedback on performance. All interventions are delivered in the form of smartphone applications.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
430 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 2 experimental conditions and an active control group.Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 2 experimental conditions and an active control group.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participants in all categories will be announced that they have received a mobile intervention aimed at distress reduction, without knowing the the rationale and specifics of each intervention. Outcomes will be assessed only by online questionnaires, so no assessor is involved.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Change of Two Mobile Psychological Interventions in Reducing Depressive, Anxiety and Stress Symptoms: PsyPills and Online-Contingent Attention Training (OCAT)
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 6, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: PsyPills

The participants randomized in this condition will receive the mobile health application "PsyPills".

Behavioral: PsyPills
Prescribing personalized rational thinking strategies to change levels of dysfunctional emotionality.

Experimental: OCAT

The participants randomized in this condition will receive the mobile health application "OCAT".

Behavioral: Online-Contingent Attention Training, OCAT
Facilitating the disengagement from negative content and engagement of positive one of personally relevant information by providing instruction and feedback on performance.

Placebo Comparator: OCAT sham

The active control group, which consists of the "fake" version of the OCAT intervention, by offering the same attentional training, without training and feedback on performance.

Behavioral: shamOCAT
The active control group, which consists of the "fake" version of the OCAT intervention, by offering the same attentional training, without training and feedback on performance.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Depressive, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms [Baseline]

    DASS-21, with scores from 0 to 63, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  2. Change from Baseline Depressive, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    DASS-21, with scores from 0 to 63, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  3. Change from Baseline Depressive, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms at 10 days [Post intervention (10 day)]

    DASS-21, with scores from 0 to 63, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  4. Change from Baseline Depressive, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    DASS-21, with scores from 0 to 63, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Functional Reappraisal [Baseline]

    Acceptance, Putting into perspective and inversed scores of Catastrophizing subscales of CERQ-SF, with scores from 6 to 30, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  2. Change from Baseline Functional Reappraisal at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    Acceptance, Putting into perspective and inversed scores of Catastrophizing subscales of CERQ-SF, with scores from 6 to 30, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  3. Change from Baseline Functional Reappraisal at 10 days [Post intervention (10 day)]

    Acceptance, Putting into perspective and inversed scores of Catastrophizing subscales of CERQ-SF, with scores from 6 to 30, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  4. Change from Baseline Functional Reappraisal at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    Acceptance, Putting into perspective and inversed scores of Catastrophizing subscales of CERQ-SF, with scores from 6 to 30, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  5. Positive Reappraisal [Baseline]

    Positive reappraisal subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  6. Change from Baseline Positive Reappraisal at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    Positive reappraisal subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  7. Change from Baseline Positive Reappraisal at 10 days [Post intervention (10 days)]

    Positive reappraisal subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  8. Change from Baseline Positive Reappraisal at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    Positive reappraisal subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning better outcomes

  9. Rational and Irrational Beliefs [Baseline]

    HABS-AV, with scores from 24 to 120, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  10. Change from Baseline Rational and Irrational Beliefs at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    HABS-AV, with scores from 24 to 120, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  11. Change from Baseline Rational and Irrational Beliefs at 10 days [Post intervention (10 days)]

    HABS-AV, with scores from 24 to 120, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  12. Change from Baseline Rational and Irrational Beliefs at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    HABS-AV, with scores from 24 to 120, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  13. Rumination [Baseline]

    Focus on thought/rumination subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  14. Change from Baseline Rumination at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    Focus on thought/rumination subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  15. Change from Baseline Rumination at 10 days [Post intervention (10 days)]

    Focus on thought/rumination subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  16. Change from Baseline Rumination at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    Focus on thought/rumination subscale of CERQ-SF, with scores from 2 to 10, higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  17. Functional and Dysfunctional Emotions [Baseline]

    PAD, functional emotions subscale, with scores from 12 to 60, and dysfunctional emotions subscale, with scores from 14 to 70, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  18. Change from Baseline Functional and Dysfunctional Emotions at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    PAD, functional emotions subscale, with scores from 12 to 60, and dysfunctional emotions subscale, with scores from 14 to 70, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  19. Change from Baseline Functional and Dysfunctional Emotions at 10 days [Post intervention (10 days)]

    PAD, functional emotions subscale, with scores from 12 to 60, and dysfunctional emotions subscale, with scores from 14 to 70, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  20. Change from Baseline Functional and Dysfunctional Emotions at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    PAD, functional emotions subscale, with scores from 12 to 60, and dysfunctional emotions subscale, with scores from 14 to 70, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

  21. Attention bias [Baseline]

    Engagement in positive information and inhibition of negative information web measures with an index of attention bias for processing positive vs. negative material computed by dividing the total fixation time on positive words by the total fixation time on emotional (positive and negative) words

  22. Change from Baseline Attention Bias at 5 days [Mid of intervention (5 days)]

    Engagement in positive information and inhibition of negative information web measures with an index of attention bias for processing positive vs. negative material computed by dividing the total fixation time on positive words by the total fixation time on emotional (positive and negative) words

  23. Change from Baseline Attention Bias at 10 days [Post intervention (10 days)]

    Engagement in positive information and inhibition of negative information web measures with an index of attention bias for processing positive vs. negative material computed by dividing the total fixation time on positive words by the total fixation time on emotional (positive and negative) words

  24. Change from Baseline Attention Bias at 1 month [Follow-up (1 month)]

    Engagement in positive information and inhibition of negative information web measures with an index of attention bias for processing positive vs. negative material computed by dividing the total fixation time on positive words by the total fixation time on emotional (positive and negative) words

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) questionnaire [During the intervention (3 times daily from day 1 to day 10)]

    Items selected from the main scales, including 8 items for rational/irrational beliefs, 9 affective state items, 5 items from the subscales of interest of CERQ-SF, on a visual analog scale (VAS) format; the direction of scores is the same with those of the original scales and subscales from which th items are taken from

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Mild and moderate levels of Depression or Anxiety or Stress symptomatology

  • Have access and able to use a smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Normal and above moderate levels of Depression or Anxiety or Stress symptomatology

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca Romania 400084

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Babes-Bolyai University
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Investigators

  • Study Director: Oana David, Dr., Babes-Bolyai University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sîrbu Vasile, PhD student, Babes-Bolyai University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05294809
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 13.912 / 29.10.2021
First Posted:
Mar 24, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sîrbu Vasile, PhD student, Babes-Bolyai University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 21, 2022