ASCI: Social Cognition Intervention
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder experience high levels of disability and poor community outcome, and these poor functional outcomes constitute a major public health concern. The treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders has shifted fundamentally from a focus on symptom reduction to a focus on recovery and improving aspects of functioning. Needed improvements in community outcome for patients with these disorders will not occur simply through better control of clinical symptoms. Instead, it is necessary to find new treatments that address the key determinants of poor functional outcome, including social cognition. Both basic (non-social) cognition and social cognition are considered key determinants of functional outcome for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Basic cognition includes the domains of: learning and memory, vigilance / attention, speed of processing, reasoning and problem solving, and working memory. Social cognition generally refers to mental operations that underlie social interactions, including perceiving, interpreting, managing, and generating responses to socially relevant stimuli, including the intentions and behaviors of others. As part of the investigators' previous Merit grant, they have developed a training program for social cognition and are in the process of validating it. Initial results suggest that the program improves performance on measures of social cognition and functional capacity.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate whether adding an in vivo component (training activities that occur in the community) to the current social cognition intervention facilitates generalization of training effects to community outcome and subjective satisfaction. Outcome measures of social cognition and functional capacity will be examined during the 12 week training program, and durability of benefits will be assessed at a 3-month follow up. Generalization to community functioning and subjective satisfaction will be assessed at the end of training and at the 3-month follow up. The investigators will enroll 105 patients across the 5 years of the study with random assignment to training group (social cognition intervention with in vivo exercises, social cognition intervention without in vivo exercises and control). Subjects will receive assessments at baseline, 6 weeks (mid-point), completion of training (12 weeks), and the 3-month follow up.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm 1: vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation |
Behavioral: social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation
24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises
|
Active Comparator: Arm 2: social cognitive social cognitive training |
Behavioral: social cognitive training
30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises
|
Active Comparator: Arm 3: non-social skills non-social skills training |
Behavioral: non-social skills training
30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) [baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months.]
A standardized measure of emotion processing. It is scored as a standard score with a population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. It can range from 0 to 200. Higher is better. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) [baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months.]
A measure of mentalizing (i.e., making inferences about other people). It is scored for accuracy in which higher is better. It ranges from 0 - 64. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study.
- Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS) [baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months.]
A measure of social perception. It is scored as number correct and higher is better. It ranges from 0 - 110. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients must be diagnosed with Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) according to Diagnosis and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) criteria. In addition, the subjects will meet the following criteria:
-
Between 18 and 60 years of age
-
Estimated premorbid intelligence quota > 70 (based on reading ability)
-
Understand spoken English sufficiently to comprehend testing procedures
-
Clinically stable (e.g., no inpatient hospitalization in the 8 weeks prior to enrollment, no significant changes in medication in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment, and none anticipated for the 3 months of participation)
-
In sufficient health to be able to walk outdoors unaided for at least 15 minutes.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
No clinically significant neurological disease as determined by medical history
-
No history of serious head injury (e.g., loss of consciousness longer than 1 hour)
-
No physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of data
-
No evidence of drug or alcohol dependence in the past six months, and not intoxicated at time of testing based on urine toxicology screen and saliva alcohol test strip. Subjects who test positive will not be disqualified but instead will be asked to return for testing on a different day. However, subjects who test positive on 3 consecutive occasions will be disqualified from the study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA | West Los Angeles | California | United States | 90073 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Development
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael F Green, PhD, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- MHBB-004-10S
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 47 | 53 | 53 |
COMPLETED | 41 | 47 | 47 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 41 | 47 | 47 | 135 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
46.3
(11.3)
|
48.8
(9.1)
|
46.7
(10.2)
|
47.3
(10.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
9
22%
|
21
44.7%
|
11
23.4%
|
41
30.4%
|
Male |
32
78%
|
26
55.3%
|
36
76.6%
|
94
69.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) |
---|---|
Description | A standardized measure of emotion processing. It is scored as a standard score with a population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. It can range from 0 to 200. Higher is better. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study. |
Time Frame | baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content |
Measure Participants | 41 | 47 | 47 |
Baseline |
87.30
(1.12)
|
87.30
(1.12)
|
88.46
(1.58)
|
6 weeks |
89.23
(1.16)
|
89.23
(1.16)
|
87.61
(1.62)
|
12 weeks |
87.84
(1.76)
|
89.78
(1.36)
|
87.68
(1.62)
|
3 months |
86.78
(1.87)
|
90.42
(1.46)
|
86.51
(1.87)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation, Arm 2: Social Cognitive, Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|
Comments | This is a statistical analysis to determine the training effect of social cognitive skills training (in vivo and social cog versus control). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < .05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments |
Title | The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) |
---|---|
Description | A measure of mentalizing (i.e., making inferences about other people). It is scored for accuracy in which higher is better. It ranges from 0 - 64. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study. |
Time Frame | baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content |
Measure Participants | 41 | 47 | 47 |
Baseline |
44.67
(.82)
|
44.67
(.82)
|
46.79
(.93)
|
6 weeks |
45.45
(.77)
|
45.45
(.77)
|
46.22
(1.04)
|
12 weeks |
46.00
(1.24)
|
46.91
(1.05)
|
46.81
(1.02)
|
3 months |
45.83
(1.4)
|
46.91
(1.05)
|
46.73
(1.00)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation, Arm 2: Social Cognitive, Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments |
Title | Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS) |
---|---|
Description | A measure of social perception. It is scored as number correct and higher is better. It ranges from 0 - 110. Note: Two of the study arms (in vivo and social cognitive training) receive identical procedures and produce identical outcome numbers for the first 6 weeks of the study. |
Time Frame | baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 3 months. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content |
Measure Participants | 41 | 47 | 47 |
baseline |
75.76
(.91)
|
75.76
(.91)
|
77.41
(1.16)
|
6 weeks |
78.90
(.79)
|
78.90
(.79)
|
79.24
(1.11)
|
12 weeks |
76.83
(1.52)
|
78.60
(1.04)
|
79.89
(1.16)
|
3 months |
76.72
(1.94)
|
79.28
(1.28)
|
80.56
(1.00)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation, Arm 2: Social Cognitive, Arm 3: Non-social Skills |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills | |||
Arm/Group Description | social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation social cognitive training with in vivo augmentation: 24 sessions of social cognitive training plus 6 sessions of in vivo exercises | social cognitive training social cognitive training: 30 sessions of social cognitive training without in vivo exercises | non-social skills training non-social skills training: 30 sessions of skills training that has no specific social content | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/47 (10.6%) | 4/53 (7.5%) | 3/53 (5.7%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
cardiac arrest | 0/47 (0%) | 0 | 1/53 (1.9%) | 1 | 0/53 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
diabetic incident | 0/47 (0%) | 0 | 0/53 (0%) | 0 | 1/53 (1.9%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
acute exacerbation of symptoms | 5/47 (10.6%) | 5 | 3/53 (5.7%) | 3 | 2/53 (3.8%) | 2 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Arm 1: Vivo Augmentation | Arm 2: Social Cognitive | Arm 3: Non-social Skills | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/47 (0%) | 0/53 (0%) | 0/53 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Michael F. Green, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | VA Greater Los Angeles, VISN 22 MIRECC |
Phone | (310) 268-3376 |
mgreen@ucla.edu |
- MHBB-004-10S