Ultrasound-guided Alveolar Recruitment in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study aims to compare the degree of atelectasis between ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment group and conventional alveolar recruitment group in patients receiving laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: LUS-guided alveolar recruitment Lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment maneuver will be performed |
Procedure: lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment
Alveolar recruitment maneuver will be performed under lung ultrasound-guidance. Positive pressure will be not exceed 40cmH2O and duration of positive pressure inflation will not exceed 10 seconds.
|
Active Comparator: conventional alveolar recruitment Alveolar recruitment maneuver will be provided with positive pressure of 30 cmH2O for 10 seconds. |
Procedure: conventional alveolar recruitment
Alveolar recruitment will be provided with positive pressure of 30cmH2O for 10 seconds
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- modified lung ultrasound score at the end of surgery [At the end of surgery]
Both lung ultrasound scores can be calculated by adding up the 12 individual pulmonary quadrant scores yielding a score between 0 (no aeration loss) and 36 (complete aeration loss).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- modified lung ultrasound score at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) [intraoperative]
Both lung ultrasound scores can be calculated by adding up the 12 individual pulmonary quadrant scores yielding a score between 0 (no aeration loss) and 36 (complete aeration loss).
- incidence of atelectasis diagnosed by ultrasonography [intraoperative]
the presence of atelectasis by ultrasonography
- arterial blood gas analyses [intraoperative]
PaO2, PaCO2, SaO2, O2 index (PaO2/FiO2)
- incidence of postoperative complications [during the postoperative period until discharge from hospital, an average of 3 days]
fever, pneumonia, atelectasis diagnosed by chest X-ray
- intraoperative mean arterial pressure [intraoperative]
mean arterial pressure in mmHg
- intraoperative SpO2 [intraoperative]
SpO2 in %
- intraoperative peak airway pressure [intraoperative]
peak airway pressure in cmH2O
- Incidence of postoperative shoulder pain at POD #1 [assessed at postoperative day 1]
patients will be asked whether they have shoulder pain or not, using NRS (0 to 10) scale
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery (laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy or laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopic myomectomy) under general anesthesia, with ASA physical status classification I or II
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previous history of lung surgery
-
Patients having pneumonia, pneumothorax, or pleural effusion in preoperative chest X-ray
-
Patients with COPD, emphysema
-
Patients with previous history of pneumothorax, or bullae
-
Morbid cardiac disease
-
Adolescent aged < 18 years
-
Anticipated duration of surgery < 1 hour
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jin-Tae Kim | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | ||
2 | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | Korea, Republic of |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jin-Tae Kim, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):494-504. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001603.
- Song IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, Ro S, Kim HS, Kim JT. Effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre guided by lung ultrasound on anaesthesia-induced atelectasis in infants: a randomised, controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2017 Feb;72(2):214-222. doi: 10.1111/anae.13713. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- H-1805-148-948