Does Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Therapy Improve Recovery From Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

Sponsor
La Trobe University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01101282
Collaborator
The Alfred (Other), Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia (Other)
92
2
2
30.1
46
1.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves clinically important outcomes in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is hypothesized that those who receive the additional PEP mask therapy will show greater improvements than those who do not.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves symptoms, quality of life and risk of re-exacerbation in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

A PEP mask is a small hand-held device that is self-applied over the nose and mouth. It creates a resistance against exhalation (outward) breaths which helps facilitate movement of sputum from the lungs towards the mouth.

Participants will be recruited from two tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia and randomised to receive either 'usual care' (comprising medical management, non-invasive ventilation if required, rehabilitation and allied health interventions) or 'usual care' plus PEP mask therapy for the duration of their hospital admission. All participants will then complete daily diaries for six months after discharge.

The effect of PEP mask therapy will be evaluated using a range of outcomes important to both patients and health care providers.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
92 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Does the Addition of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Mask Therapy to Usual Medical Care Improve Patients' Symptoms, Quality or Life and Risk of Future Exacerbations in Individuals With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)?
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: 'Usual care'

Participants will receive 'usual medical care' consisting of the following: Medical management: Bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics and supplemental oxygen will be provided (where appropriate) in accordance with Australian and New Zealand COPD management guidelines (COPDX guidelines). Non-invasive ventilation: if clinically indicated and prescribed in accordance with standardised hospital guidelines. Physical rehabilitation: Participants will be assessed by a physiotherapist and prescribed appropriate exercises to facilitate a safe and timely discharge. Participants will perform physical rehabilitation according to a standardised protocol with an aim of maximising physical function at discharge. Other allied health (e.g. occupational therapy, speech pathology, dietician) assessments and interventions, as required.

Experimental: 'Usual care' plus PEP mask therapy

This will comprise: 'Usual care' PEP mask therapy

Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy
PEP mask therapy will be performed once/day, supervised, by an experienced physiotherapist until hospital discharge or ≥ 24 hours without sputum expectoration (whichever comes first). Written instructions shall also be provided, encouraging two more independent PEP mask sessions per day. Each session will comprise up to 5 cycles of 8-10 slightly active breaths, followed by 2 huffs (FET) and 2 coughs. A target pressure of 10-20 cms H20 during the middle of expiration shall be used (monitored via a pressure manometer).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Symptom severity [Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1)]

    Measured via the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS).

  2. Symptom severity [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    Measured via the BCSS

  3. Symptom severity [8 weeks following hospital discharge]

    Measured via the BCSS

  4. Symptom severity [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured via the BCSS

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Disease-specific quality of life [Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1)]

    Measured via the 4-week English (Australian) version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

  2. Disease-specific quality of life [8 weeks following hospital discharge]

    Measured via the SGRQ

  3. Disease-specific quality of life [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured via the SGRQ

  4. Need for assisted (non-invasive and/or invasive) ventilation during hospitalisation (within, and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital) [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    The number of participants needing non-invasive or invasive ventilation during their inpatient stay shall be assessed. As early non-invasive ventilation is commonly used for the management of acute exacerbations of COPD, this outcome shall be assessed both within and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital. This aims to differentiate usual care from clinical deterioration.

  5. Hospital length of stay [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    Measured as number of days

  6. Time to first exacerbation [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of days

  7. Time to first hospitalisation (due to respiratory illness) [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of days

  8. Number of acute exacerbations [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of events

  9. Number of hospitalisations (due to respiratory illness) [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of events

  10. Total number of hospitalised days [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of hospitalised days

  11. Lung function (spirometry) [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%

  12. Lung function (spirometry) [6 months following hospital discharge]

    e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%

  13. Mortality (actual, all cause) [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    Measured as number of events

  14. Mortality (actual, all cause) [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured as number of events

  15. Mortality (predicted) [At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)]

    Measured via calculation of the BODE index. The BODE index is derived from: Body mass index, Obstruction severity (spirometry), Dyspnoea (MRC dyspnoea scale) and Exercise tolerance (6 minute walk test).

  16. Mortality (predicted) [6 months following hospital discharge]

    Measured via BODE index

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria (all of the following criteria must be met):
  • The primary reason for hospital admission is an acute exacerbation of clinically diagnosed COPD

  • There is evidence of sputum expectoration or they are a chronic sputum producer ('regularly expectorates sputum on most days')

  • They are able and willing to provide written, informed consent

  • Recent (within the last 6 months) lung function data indicates obstructive lung disease (of any severity), according to the GOLD criteria: post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 (only if available)

  • They have a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack/years (only if diagnosis unclear)

Exclusion Criteria (none of the following criteria must be present):
  • They are breathing via an artificial airway (e.g. endotracheal or tracheostomy tube)

  • They have a more significant respiratory disease other than COPD (e.g. primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, asthma, lung cancer)

  • They have had recent (within the last 6 months) lung volume reduction procedure(s) (e.g. surgery, valve or stent insertion, or other), lung transplantation or pneumonectomy

  • The intervention is contraindicated (including but not limited to evidence of undrained pneumothorax, significant frank haemoptysis, recent facial, oral, oesophageal or skull surgery/trauma, altered conscious state or inability to co-operate)

  • They have poor oxygen saturation at rest (SpO2 < 88%) despite supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal prongs

  • They intend to continue performing established ACT routines throughout the study period

  • It is more than 48 hours since being admitted as an inpatient to hospital.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The Austin Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia 3084
2 The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia 3181

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • La Trobe University
  • The Alfred
  • Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian R Osadnik, Bachelor of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Christian Osadnik, Physiotherapist, PhD candidate, La Trobe University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01101282
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • (not yet specified)
First Posted:
Apr 9, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Feb 15, 2013
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2013
Keywords provided by Christian Osadnik, Physiotherapist, PhD candidate, La Trobe University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 15, 2013