EQuiP COPD: Pragmatic Trial to Enhance Quality Safety, and Patient Experience in COPD

Sponsor
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05718102
Collaborator
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Other)
4,000
5
2
43.6
800
18.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background: Over 26 million Americans have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Unfortunately, few patients receive proven therapies and many receive therapies known to have safer alternatives. One major reason is the competing demands of primary care providers (PCPs) who manage 90% of patients with COPD. The research team has developed a population management approach where pulmonary specialists provide evidence-based recommendations as an E-consult with unsigned orders to PCPs. PCPs can then quickly review the E-consult and sign, modify, or discontinue these orders. The investigators found this intervention led to marked improvements in the quality-of-care delivered and patients' COPD-related quality-of-life. While promising, this approach is limited by a paucity of pulmonary providers nationwide. Clinical pharmacists are 20 times more prevalent as pulmonary specialists and some regions of VA (VISN 17, COPD Cares) have assigned clinical pharmacists a role in the management of patients with COPD. However, the relative effectiveness of pharmacist-led management is yet to be established.

Study Description: The goal is to determine if two forms of usual care population management among patients with COPD is as good as when provided by a pharmacist relative to a pulmonary specialist. The investigators are conducting a cluster randomized clinical trial at five medical centers and their associated clinics within the Department of Veterans Affair. Study staff will randomize PCPs to population management conducted by either pulmonary specialists or pharmacists. Within PCPs' panels, study staff will use VA electronic health record to identify patients with evidence of COPD. Pulmonologists and pharmacists will review these patients and provide guideline-based recommendations to PCPs. Pulmonary specialists and pharmacists will then deliver evidence-based recommendations through E-consults coupled with unsigned orders for primary care providers to sign, modify or decline.

Outcomes: Investigators will assess if proactive, population management recommendations by clinical pharmacists and pulmonary specialists lead to non-inferior outcomes for patients with COPD. Primary outcomes will be 1) the proportion of guideline recommended therapies received by patients, 2) COPD-related quality-of-life as measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, and 3) composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or death six month after intervention. Secondary outcomes will include PCP acceptance of recommendations, and each individual outcome within the primary composite endpoint above.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Population-health management
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
4000 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Pragmatic Trial to Enhance Quality Safety, and Patient Experience in COPD
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 16, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Pharmacist led

Pharmacists will conduct population health management for patients with COPD

Other: Population-health management
Population-health management

Active Comparator: Pulmonologist led

Pulmonologists will conduct population health management for patients with COPD

Other: Population-health management
Population-health management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of COPD care [3 months after intervention]

    Proportion of evidence-based practices received

  2. COPD-related quality- of-life [3 months after intervention]

    Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). The CCQ includes 10 items encompassing three domains (symptoms, functional state, and mental state). Response options range from "never" to "almost all the time" and are scored from 0-to-6. The total score is calculated by the addition of each item divided by the total number of items, producing a range of scores between 0-6.

  3. Proportion of patients with COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or Death (composite outcome) [6 months after intervention]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Acceptance of Recommendations [3 months after intervention]

    Proportion of recommendations that are accepted by PCPs

  2. Proportion of patients with COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or Death (individual outcomes) [6 months after intervention]

  3. Heterogeneity of treatment effect on primary and secondary outcomes by subgroup [6 months after intervention]

    Compare heterogeneity of treatment effect on primary and secondary outcomes by intervention priority/risk, age, race, sex, rurality, and multimorbidity.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Participants may be PCP physicians and advance practice providers (APP) practicing at participating sites, and their patients who are diagnosed with or treated for COPD based on the following criteria:
  1. Recent discharge from hospital for COPD exacerbation

  2. Recent outpatient exacerbation (emergency room (ER), primary care)

  3. Received prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) but does not meet criteria for ICS use

  4. Diagnosis of COPD and/or treatment and active smoker not receiving smoking cessation aide

  5. Treatment for COPD without evidence of spirometry within 10 years, or no airflow obstruction on existing spirometry

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Minneapolis VA Health Care System Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55417
2 Portland VA Medical Center Portland Oregon United States 97239
3 Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center Charleston South Carolina United States 29401
4 VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Washington United States 98108
5 Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center Spokane Washington United States 99205

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucas M Donovan, MD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
  • Principal Investigator: David H Au, MD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05718102
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PCORI-23668
First Posted:
Feb 8, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Feb 8, 2023
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 8, 2023