A Randomized Trial Comparing a Ventilatory Strategy To Prevent Atelectasis Versus a Lateral Decubitus Strategy During Robotic Bronchoscopy (VESPA vs. LADS Trial)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To learn if LADS is better than VESPA at preventing atelectasis during a robotic bronchoscopy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
To compare the proportion of patients developing target-obscuring atelectasis when using a lateral decubitus strategy (LADS) vs using a ventilatory strategy to prevent atelectasis (VESPA) during robotic bronchoscopy for posteriorly-located peripheral lung lesions.
Secondary Objectives:
-
To compare the proportion of patients with atelectasis in the target lobe in VESPA vs. LADS during robotic bronchoscopy.
-
To compare the proportion of patients with atelectasis obscuring 100%, 50% or more, and less than 50% of the target during robotic bronchoscopy using LADS vs. VESPA.
-
To compare the proportion of patients in whom a biopsy sample was not taken due to atelectasis using LADS vs. VESPA.
-
To compare the diagnostic yield using LADS vs. VESPA.
-
To compare the proportion of tool in lesion (TIL) using LADS vs. VESPA.
-
To compare the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for malignancy using LADS vs. VESPA.
-
To compare the proportion of LADS-induced vs. VESPA-induced complications.
-
To compare the proportion of bronchoscopy-induced complications in LADS vs. VESPA.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group 1 Group 1, Participants will receive VESAP during the bronchoscopy. Ventilatory Strategy To Prevent Atelectasis versus a Lateral Decubitus Strategy During Robotic Bronchoscopy |
Procedure: Ventilatory Strategy To Prevent Atelectasis
Given
|
Experimental: Group 2 Group 2, Participants will receive LADS Lateral Decubitus Strategy During Robotic Bronchoscopy during the bronchoscopy. |
Procedure: Lateral Decubitus Strategy (LADS)
Given
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Incidence of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version (v) 5.0 [through study completion; an average of 1 year.]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) undergoing diagnostic robotic bronchoscopy for a lung nodule suspicious for malignancy bronchoscopy under general anesthesia.
-
Lung nodules should be up to 3 cm in diameter and located in right or left bronchial segments B2, B6, B9, and B10. Greater than 50% of the volume of the lesion needs to be below a horizontal line traced at the most anterior edge of the corresponding vertebral body.
-
Chest CT performed < 4 weeks prior to bronchoscopy.
-
Voluntary informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with prior lung consolidation, interstitial changes or lung masses (> 3 cm in diameter) as seen on most recent CT
-
Lesions outside of the designated lung areas defined as inclusion criteria.
-
Known pregnancy
-
Vulnerable population
-
Ascites
-
Known diaphragmatic paralysis
-
Smokers or ex-smokers with known or suspected severe air-trapping defined as residual volume > 150% of predicted
-
History of primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
-
Lung bullae > 5 cm
-
Patients with mediastinal or hilar adenopathy with high suspicion for malignancy in whom lymph node sampling is indicated and should occur prior to robotic bronchoscopy of the peripheral lesion.
-
Patient with active COVID pneumonia.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roberto Casal, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- 2022-0756
- NCI-2023-00783