The Efficacy of Laser in Root Canal Disinfection

Sponsor
Future University in Egypt (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05964686
Collaborator
Ain Shams University (Other)
30
1
3
11.9
2.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to assess in vivo the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG/diode laser and Diode/EDTA on post operative pain and bacterial count in root canal treatment in an evidence-based clinical trial. The null hypothesis being tested is that there is no difference in post operative pain and total bacterial count reduction between conventional irrigation and the two types of lasers used.

Thirty patients are equally divided into 3 separate groups :
  • Group A (Conventional): 2.5% NaOCL and 17% EDTA.

  • Group B(Dual): saline along with Er,Cr:YSGG laser and diode laser combination

  • Group C(Combined): saline along with 17% EDTA and diode laser combination Each patient is given pain scale chart Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to record his/her pain level before any endodontic treatment. Microbiological analysis will be done for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using Colony forming units. All data will be collected, tabulated, summarized, and statistically analyzed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Combination Product: Conventional group (NaOCl/EDTA)
  • Combination Product: Dual laser group (Er,Cr:YSGG/Diode):
  • Combination Product: Combined group (EDTA/Diode):
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The use of lasers in disinfection of the root canal has been recently implemented. Lasers have bactericidal effect, and have deep penetration depth inside the root canal up to 1000 um. Thus, it can be used effectively for disinfection of the root canal system following biomechanical instrumentation reaching areas which were considered before non-reachable.

The aim of this study is to assess in vivo the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG/diode laser and Diode/EDTA on post operative pain and bacterial count in root canal treatment in an evidence-based clinical trial. The null hypothesis being tested is that there is no difference in post operative pain and total bacterial count reduction between conventional irrigation and the two types of lasers used.

Thirty patients are equally divided into 3 separate groups :
  • Group A (Conventional): 2.5% NaOCL and 17% EDTA.

  • Group B(Dual): saline along with Er,Cr:YSGG laser and diode laser combination

  • Group C(Combined): saline along with 17% EDTA and diode laser combination Each patient will be given pain scale chart (NRS scale) to record his/her pain level before any endodontic treatment. After disinfection, local anesthetic and tooth isolation and access cavity preparation, the first microbial samples (S1) will be collected using 3 sterile paper points and immediately placed inside sterile tubes containing transport medium of thioglycolate, cleaning and shaping with final disinfection protocol will be performed according to the group in which the participant was allocated to. Followed by S2 sample. obturation using warm vertical compaction technique. Patients are asked to mark on a numeric rating scale (NRS) to determine incidence of postoperative pain and rate its intensity at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours, and 7 days after the procedure Microbiological analysis will be done for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using Colony forming units. All data will be collected, tabulated, summarized, and statistically analyzed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Efficacy of 2780 nm Er,Cr;YSGG and 940 nm Diode Laser in Root Canal Disinfection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional group A

Combination Product: Conventional group (NaOCl/EDTA)
conventional disinfection using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA

Experimental: Dual laser group B

Combination Product: Dual laser group (Er,Cr:YSGG/Diode):
Er,Cr:YSGG intracanal laser irradiation to remove smear layer followed by diode laser for disinfection

Experimental: Combined group C

Combination Product: Combined group (EDTA/Diode):
17% EDTA was used to remove smear layer followed by diode laser for disinfection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Postoperative pain assessment [post operative pain will be assessed by calculating median and mean values of pain scores recorded by the patients after 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours, and up to 7 days after the procedure]

    Patients will be asked to mark Numeric rating scale (NRS) to determine incidence of postoperative pain and rate its intensity. The NRS consisted of a line anchored by two extremes "No pain" and "the worst pain". Pain level assigned to one of 4 categorical scores: No pain (0), Mild (1-3), Moderate (4-6) and Severe (7-10).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quantitative microbiological analysis [baseline (S1): sample will be obtained before canal disinfection. post operative (S2): sample will be obtained after canal disinfection in a single visit]

    aerobic bacterial count will be assessed using colony forming units (CFU) and will be expressed in (CFU/ml). anaerobic bacterial count will be assessed using colony forming units (CFU) and will be expressed in (CFU/ml).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • • Patients who are medically free.

  • Patient's age between 18-35 years.

  • One single rooted maxillary anterior tooth with necrotic pulp and asymptomatic apical periodontitis requiring root canal treatment.

  • Patients complaining of no pain and without fistulous tract.

  • Periapical lesion with a periapical index score of 3 or 4 (Ørstavik, et al. (1986)108

  • Closed apex.

  • Acceptance to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients suffering from any systemic disease.

  • Patients who had received antibiotics during the last month.

  • Patients taking analgesics 12 hours before interventions.

  • Patients with history of tobacco usage

  • Teeth with vital pulp, calcified canals, and immature or incompletely formed apices.

  • Teeth with previous endodontic treatment.

  • Non restorable teeth where rubber dam could not be applied.

  • Teeth with periodontal pocket more than 3 mm.

  • Teeth with greater than grade 1 mobility.

  • Teeth with swelling/sinus tract.

  • Technical difficulties in the course of root canal treatment for example:

  • A tooth with curved roots

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ain Shams University Cairo Abbassia Egypt 11566

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Future University in Egypt
  • Ain Shams University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sara Zakaria Fahim, assistant lecturer, Future University in Egypt
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05964686
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FDASU-Rec ID 041908
First Posted:
Jul 28, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jul 28, 2023
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sara Zakaria Fahim, assistant lecturer, Future University in Egypt
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 28, 2023