Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Pulpotomies in Primary Molars

Sponsor
Marmara University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04115358
Collaborator
(none)
47
1
3
17.1
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol (FC) pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate (FS) treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel (HA) pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay will be removed, the pulp will be amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one of the medicament will be applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide cement, and the primary molars will be restored with a composite filling material or with a stainless steel crown (SSC). A single investigator will perform the procedure. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething
  • Procedure: Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol
  • Procedure: Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat
N/A

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the materials used in pulpotomies, and to evaluate the success of hyaluronic gel over the formocresol and/or ferric sulfate considered as the gold standard for this type of treatment.

Pulpotomy is an endodontic treatment method aiming to maintain primary molar affected from deep caries and acute pulpitis by removing the effected pulpal tissue, leaving the remaining root canal pulp and maintaining its vitality and function until the tooth exfoliates physiologically. In order to remain canals intact and uninflamed various dental materials are used according to treatment purposes; categorized into three groups as devitalizing, preventive and regenerative treatment.

  1. Devitalization: Formocresol, Glutaraldehyde, Electro-surgery

  2. Protective: Ferric Sulfate, Calcium Hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Lasers

  3. Regenerative: Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Enriched Collagen

The ideal agent or method for pulpotomy treatment of the primary teeth has not been determined yet but the earliest method of diluted formocresol is considered by many the gold standard. Formocresol is a strong strain that fixes living tissues. It contains formaldehyde gas, organic structures, dentin channels and narrow side channels until the bacteria are also fixed. 10% formalin solution (14% formaldehyde) is used as a tissue fixative.

Ferric Sulfate an other material for pulpotomy is used in dentistry mainly as a hemostatic agent. It has several advantages over formocresol such as non-mutagenic property and keeping root canal pulp vital.

Hyaluronic acid gel, which is a new product as a pulpotomy material, has been used in dentistry as well as medicine for many years. It is distributed widely in epithelial and connective tissues. Medical uses include joint treatments, skin lotions for atopic dermatitis, cosmetic surgery etc. In dentistry, gingivitis, teething, dental surgery including implants and sinus lifting procedures and oral ulcers are main target for hyaluronic acid treatment. This study extends the use of hyaluronic acid to primary tooth endodontics.

In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. Sample size calculation showed that at first 40 teeth in each group will be required to detect a significant difference (80% power, two-sided 5% significance level).

Ethical approval of the study was taken from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry at Marmara University (No: 2019/288) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients' family will be given information about the pros and cons of the study on the relevant teeth and then a written consent will be obtained.

Patients will be selected for this study according to the following criteria:
  1. Children who have good cooperation, do not require general anesthesia or sedation, and who do not have any systemic disease, allergic reactions, or any use of medications.

  2. No spontaneous, continuous pain in the tooth, no pathological or physiological mobility, no abscess and/or fistula, no tenderness to palpation or percussion.

  3. The tooth can be restored with a stainless steel crown (SSC) or a composite filling material after treatment.

  4. The physiological resorption in the tooth root not exceeding 1/3.

  5. No pathological resorption in the tooth root canals internally and/or externally, no radiolucency in the periapical or furcation regions, no enlargement of periodontal ligaments.

Exclusion criteria:
  1. Children who have any disorders, spontaneous pain, no restorable primary molars, may exfoliate soon and teeth with apical periodontitis, pulp necrosis, abscess, fistula, swelling or mobility.

  2. Families who are not willing to join the study.

After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, local anesthesia is administrated, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay is removed, the roof of the pulp chamber is removed by joining the pulp horns with a bur cut. The coronal pulp is amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one or more cotton pellets is placed over the site and pressure is applied. When the hemostasis is insured, one of the medicament is applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide eugenol cement. The primary molars were restored either with a stainless-steel crown in case of proximal cavities or with a composite filling material in case of occlusal cavities. A single pediatric dentist will perform whole pulpotomy treatments and restorations of all selected teeth. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, 12 months.

The teeth will be evaluated clinically and radiographically according to the following criteria:

  1. Clinical criteria: Spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion and/or palpation, pathological mobility and abscess or fistula.

  2. Radiographic criteria: Periapical or furcal radiolucency, internal or external root resorption, loss of lamina dura.

All evaluations will be performed by two calibrated pediatric dentists. The performing dentist will not be blinded to the treatment materials but the patient and two examiners who evaluated clinical and radiographic findings will be blinded to the treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
47 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate and Hyaluronic Acid Pulpotomies on Human Primary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Hyaluronic acid

Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar.

Procedure: Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething
Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.

Active Comparator: Formocresol

0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar.

Procedure: Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol
Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.

Active Comparator: Ferric sulfate

0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar.

Procedure: Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat
Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe

  2. Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe

  3. Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]

    Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe

  4. Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]

    Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe

  5. Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration

  6. Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 month in 3 groups]

    Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration

  7. Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 month in 3 groups]

    Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration

  8. Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]

    Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration

  9. Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically

  10. Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically

  11. Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]

    Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically

  12. Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]

    Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically

  13. Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically

  14. Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically

  15. Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]

    Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically

  16. Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months]

    Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically

  17. Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined

  18. Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined

  19. Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]

    The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined

  20. Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]

    The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined

  21. Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs

  22. Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs

  23. Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months]

    Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs

  24. Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months]

    Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs

  25. Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]

    Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration

  26. Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]

    Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration

  27. Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]

    Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration

  28. Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]

    Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 1 month]

    The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth

  2. Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 3 months]

    The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth

  3. Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 6 months]

    The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth

  4. Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 12 months]

    The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
5 Years to 9 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • No systemic disease,

  • No pathological mobility and/or resorption of the tooth,

  • No pain and/or abscess,

  • Parents volunteering,

  • The patients are between 5-9 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Systemic disease,

  • Pathological mobility and resorption of the tooth,

  • Pain and/or abscess,

  • Non voluntary,

  • The patients aren't between 5-9 years old.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry Istanbul Turkey 34854

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Marmara University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Mentes, Prof, Marmara University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marmara University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04115358
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MarmaraPD
First Posted:
Oct 4, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 3, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Marmara University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The first participant was enrolled in May 2019 and the last participant was enrolled in September 2019. No important changes in methods or selection criteria have been done. 1st, 3rd and 6th months assessments were made without complications but 1-year examination had some face to face problems with the Covid-19 pandemics. So some final examinations and patient comforts had been done via phone and/or online connections.
Pre-assignment Detail The study was initially carried out on 136 primary molars of 47 children. Three children (2 boys, 1 girl) did not show up in any recalls, so the study was performed in 130 primary molars.
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 34 33 34
COMPLETED 34 33 33
NOT COMPLETED 0 0 1

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate Total
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 34 33 34 101
Overall tooth 51 40 39 130
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
34
100%
33
100%
34
100%
101
100%
Between 18 and 65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
6.65
(0.99)
6.83
(0.98)
6.67
(1.08)
6.71
(1.015)
Sex: Female, Male (tooth) [Count of Units]
Female
32
25
23
80
Male
19
15
16
50
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
Turkey
34
100%
33
100%
34
100%
101
100%
Dental Arch/Tooth Type (tooth) [Count of Units]
Maxillary 1st primary molars
11
9
7
27
Maxillary 2nd primary molars
17
13
8
38
Mandibular 1st primary molars
14
11
15
40
Mandibular 2nd primary molars
9
7
9
25
Dental Arch (tooth) [Count of Units]
Lower Arch
23
18
24
65
Upper Arch
28
22
15
65
Tooth Type (tooth) [Count of Units]
1st primary molars
25
20
22
67
2nd primary molars
26
20
17
63
Final Restoration (tooth) [Count of Units]
SSC
33
28
28
89
Composite
18
12
11
41

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Description Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
7
6
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Description Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 50 teeth are evaluated
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
10
8
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
3. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Description Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group and 1 participant so no observation for 1 tooth and 1 participant in FS
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
11
8
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
4. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Description Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 48 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
2
6
2
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
5. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Description Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
1
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
6. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Description Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth extracted from HA group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
1
0
1
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
7. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Description Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group (1 participant ) so 1 child and 1 tooth is reduced from FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
3
2
1
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
8. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Description Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth but participants still exist
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 48 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
4
4
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
9. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Description Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
1
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
10. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Description Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth extracted from HA group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
11. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Description Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated (one participant) so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced from FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
12. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Description Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 teeth exfoliated in HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 but no participant is reduced
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 48 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
13. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Description Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
1
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
14. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Description Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
15. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Description Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced in FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
16. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Description Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48 but participants are same
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 48 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
17. Primary Outcome
Title Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
Description The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
18. Primary Outcome
Title Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
Description The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
1
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
19. Primary Outcome
Title Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
Description The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
0
0
1
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
20. Primary Outcome
Title Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
Description The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 exfoliations in HA group are shown here
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
2
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
21. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Description Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Periapical resorption
1
1
2
Internal resorption
6
4
1
External resorption
1
0
1
No resorption
43
35
35
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
22. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Description Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth extracted in HA group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Periapical resorption
2
3
4
Internal resorption
9
11
6
External resorption
6
1
3
No resorption
33
25
26
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
23. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Description Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced in FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Periapical resorption
7
5
5
Internal resorption
11
12
10
External resorption
5
5
5
No resorption
27
18
18
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
24. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Description Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 28 26 26
Measure teeth 35 32 31
Periapical resorption
12
8
15
Internal resorption
11
8
5
External resorption
7
6
5
No resorption
5
10
6
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
25. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Description Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
3
1
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
26. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Description Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 1 tooth is reduced but not participant
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Count of Units [teeth]
7
3
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
27. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Description Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are not evaluated in FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Count of Units [teeth]
4
4
3
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
28. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Description Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 28 26 26
Measure teeth 35 32 31
Count of Units [teeth]
4
4
2
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
29. Secondary Outcome
Title Restoration Stability
Description The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 1 month

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 51 40 39
Stainless steel crown
33
28
28
Composite
18
12
11
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
30. Secondary Outcome
Title Restoration Stability
Description The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 3 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth extracted from HA group so reduced to 50 teeth but no participant reduction
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 34
Measure teeth 50 40 39
Stainless steel crown
32
28
28
Composite
18
12
11
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
31. Secondary Outcome
Title Restoration Stability
Description The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 6 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced from FS group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 50 40 38
Stainless steel crown
32
28
27
Composite
18
12
11
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
32. Secondary Outcome
Title Restoration Stability
Description The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time Frame Change from Baseline at 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth in HA group
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
Measure Participants 34 33 33
Measure teeth 48 40 38
Stainless steel crown
31
28
27
Composite
17
12
11
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate
Comments Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame Overall study;1st month,3rd month,6th month and 12th month after the treatments
Adverse Event Reporting Description pain or discomfort may be seen after the treatment of the primary tooth tooth can be exfoliated prematurely
Arm/Group Title Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Arm/Group Description Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material.
All Cause Mortality
Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/34 (0%) 0/33 (0%) 0/34 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/34 (0%) 0/33 (0%) 0/34 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Hyaluronic Acid Formocresol Ferric Sulfate
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/34 (0%) 0/33 (0%) 0/34 (0%)
Infections and infestations
pulpitis 0/34 (0%) 0 0/33 (0%) 0 0/34 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

The limitations of this study included the unfortunate Covid-19 pandemic that interfered with the radiographic results of our study at 12th month, 8 participants did not show up to the dental appointments at 12th month and complicated the follow-up results on radiographs. However we managed to do the clinical examinations of all patients via social video conferencing devices (teledentistry).

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Prof. Dr. Ali Mentes
Organization Marmara University
Phone +90 2164140545
Email alimentes@gmail.com
Responsible Party:
Marmara University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04115358
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MarmaraPD
First Posted:
Oct 4, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 3, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021