Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Pulpotomies in Primary Molars
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol (FC) pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate (FS) treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel (HA) pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay will be removed, the pulp will be amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one of the medicament will be applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide cement, and the primary molars will be restored with a composite filling material or with a stainless steel crown (SSC). A single investigator will perform the procedure. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the materials used in pulpotomies, and to evaluate the success of hyaluronic gel over the formocresol and/or ferric sulfate considered as the gold standard for this type of treatment.
Pulpotomy is an endodontic treatment method aiming to maintain primary molar affected from deep caries and acute pulpitis by removing the effected pulpal tissue, leaving the remaining root canal pulp and maintaining its vitality and function until the tooth exfoliates physiologically. In order to remain canals intact and uninflamed various dental materials are used according to treatment purposes; categorized into three groups as devitalizing, preventive and regenerative treatment.
-
Devitalization: Formocresol, Glutaraldehyde, Electro-surgery
-
Protective: Ferric Sulfate, Calcium Hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Lasers
-
Regenerative: Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Enriched Collagen
The ideal agent or method for pulpotomy treatment of the primary teeth has not been determined yet but the earliest method of diluted formocresol is considered by many the gold standard. Formocresol is a strong strain that fixes living tissues. It contains formaldehyde gas, organic structures, dentin channels and narrow side channels until the bacteria are also fixed. 10% formalin solution (14% formaldehyde) is used as a tissue fixative.
Ferric Sulfate an other material for pulpotomy is used in dentistry mainly as a hemostatic agent. It has several advantages over formocresol such as non-mutagenic property and keeping root canal pulp vital.
Hyaluronic acid gel, which is a new product as a pulpotomy material, has been used in dentistry as well as medicine for many years. It is distributed widely in epithelial and connective tissues. Medical uses include joint treatments, skin lotions for atopic dermatitis, cosmetic surgery etc. In dentistry, gingivitis, teething, dental surgery including implants and sinus lifting procedures and oral ulcers are main target for hyaluronic acid treatment. This study extends the use of hyaluronic acid to primary tooth endodontics.
In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. Sample size calculation showed that at first 40 teeth in each group will be required to detect a significant difference (80% power, two-sided 5% significance level).
Ethical approval of the study was taken from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry at Marmara University (No: 2019/288) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients' family will be given information about the pros and cons of the study on the relevant teeth and then a written consent will be obtained.
Patients will be selected for this study according to the following criteria:
-
Children who have good cooperation, do not require general anesthesia or sedation, and who do not have any systemic disease, allergic reactions, or any use of medications.
-
No spontaneous, continuous pain in the tooth, no pathological or physiological mobility, no abscess and/or fistula, no tenderness to palpation or percussion.
-
The tooth can be restored with a stainless steel crown (SSC) or a composite filling material after treatment.
-
The physiological resorption in the tooth root not exceeding 1/3.
-
No pathological resorption in the tooth root canals internally and/or externally, no radiolucency in the periapical or furcation regions, no enlargement of periodontal ligaments.
Exclusion criteria:
-
Children who have any disorders, spontaneous pain, no restorable primary molars, may exfoliate soon and teeth with apical periodontitis, pulp necrosis, abscess, fistula, swelling or mobility.
-
Families who are not willing to join the study.
After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, local anesthesia is administrated, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay is removed, the roof of the pulp chamber is removed by joining the pulp horns with a bur cut. The coronal pulp is amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one or more cotton pellets is placed over the site and pressure is applied. When the hemostasis is insured, one of the medicament is applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide eugenol cement. The primary molars were restored either with a stainless-steel crown in case of proximal cavities or with a composite filling material in case of occlusal cavities. A single pediatric dentist will perform whole pulpotomy treatments and restorations of all selected teeth. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, 12 months.
The teeth will be evaluated clinically and radiographically according to the following criteria:
-
Clinical criteria: Spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion and/or palpation, pathological mobility and abscess or fistula.
-
Radiographic criteria: Periapical or furcal radiolucency, internal or external root resorption, loss of lamina dura.
All evaluations will be performed by two calibrated pediatric dentists. The performing dentist will not be blinded to the treatment materials but the patient and two examiners who evaluated clinical and radiographic findings will be blinded to the treatment.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Hyaluronic acid Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. |
Procedure: Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething
Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
|
Active Comparator: Formocresol 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. |
Procedure: Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol
Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
|
Active Comparator: Ferric sulfate 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. |
Procedure: Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat
Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
- Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
- Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
- Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
- Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
- Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 month in 3 groups]
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
- Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 month in 3 groups]
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
- Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
- Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
- Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
- Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
- Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
- Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
- Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
- Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
- Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months]
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
- Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
- Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
- Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
- Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
- Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
- Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
- Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months]
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
- Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months]
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
- Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups]
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
- Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups]
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
- Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups]
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
- Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups [Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups]
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 1 month]
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
- Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 3 months]
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
- Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 6 months]
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
- Restoration Stability [Change from Baseline at 12 months]
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
No systemic disease,
-
No pathological mobility and/or resorption of the tooth,
-
No pain and/or abscess,
-
Parents volunteering,
-
The patients are between 5-9 years old.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Systemic disease,
-
Pathological mobility and resorption of the tooth,
-
Pain and/or abscess,
-
Non voluntary,
-
The patients aren't between 5-9 years old.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry | Istanbul | Turkey | 34854 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Marmara University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ali Mentes, Prof, Marmara University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- MarmaraPD
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | The first participant was enrolled in May 2019 and the last participant was enrolled in September 2019. No important changes in methods or selection criteria have been done. 1st, 3rd and 6th months assessments were made without complications but 1-year examination had some face to face problems with the Covid-19 pandemics. So some final examinations and patient comforts had been done via phone and/or online connections. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | The study was initially carried out on 136 primary molars of 47 children. Three children (2 boys, 1 girl) did not show up in any recalls, so the study was performed in 130 primary molars. |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown and composite filling material. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 34 | 33 | 34 |
COMPLETED | 34 | 33 | 33 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar. Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 | 101 |
Overall tooth | 51 | 40 | 39 | 130 |
Age (Count of Participants) | ||||
<=18 years |
34
100%
|
33
100%
|
34
100%
|
101
100%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
6.65
(0.99)
|
6.83
(0.98)
|
6.67
(1.08)
|
6.71
(1.015)
|
Sex: Female, Male (tooth) [Count of Units] | ||||
Female |
32
|
25
|
23
|
80
|
Male |
19
|
15
|
16
|
50
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | ||||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
|||
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | ||||
Turkey |
34
100%
|
33
100%
|
34
100%
|
101
100%
|
Dental Arch/Tooth Type (tooth) [Count of Units] | ||||
Maxillary 1st primary molars |
11
|
9
|
7
|
27
|
Maxillary 2nd primary molars |
17
|
13
|
8
|
38
|
Mandibular 1st primary molars |
14
|
11
|
15
|
40
|
Mandibular 2nd primary molars |
9
|
7
|
9
|
25
|
Dental Arch (tooth) [Count of Units] | ||||
Lower Arch |
23
|
18
|
24
|
65
|
Upper Arch |
28
|
22
|
15
|
65
|
Tooth Type (tooth) [Count of Units] | ||||
1st primary molars |
25
|
20
|
22
|
67
|
2nd primary molars |
26
|
20
|
17
|
63
|
Final Restoration (tooth) [Count of Units] | ||||
SSC |
33
|
28
|
28
|
89
|
Composite |
18
|
12
|
11
|
41
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
7
|
6
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 50 teeth are evaluated |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
10
|
8
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group and 1 participant so no observation for 1 tooth and 1 participant in FS |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
11
|
8
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48 |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 48 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
2
|
6
|
2
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
1
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth extracted from HA group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
1
|
0
|
1
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group (1 participant ) so 1 child and 1 tooth is reduced from FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
3
|
2
|
1
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth but participants still exist |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 48 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
4
|
4
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
1
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth extracted from HA group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated (one participant) so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced from FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 teeth exfoliated in HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 but no participant is reduced |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 48 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
1
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced in FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48 but participants are same |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 48 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
1
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 exfoliations in HA group are shown here |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
2
|
0
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Periapical resorption |
1
|
1
|
2
|
Internal resorption |
6
|
4
|
1
|
External resorption |
1
|
0
|
1
|
No resorption |
43
|
35
|
35
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth extracted in HA group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Periapical resorption |
2
|
3
|
4
|
Internal resorption |
9
|
11
|
6
|
External resorption |
6
|
1
|
3
|
No resorption |
33
|
25
|
26
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced in FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Periapical resorption |
7
|
5
|
5
|
Internal resorption |
11
|
12
|
10
|
External resorption |
5
|
5
|
5
|
No resorption |
27
|
18
|
18
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 26 | 26 |
Measure teeth | 35 | 32 | 31 |
Periapical resorption |
12
|
8
|
15
|
Internal resorption |
11
|
8
|
5
|
External resorption |
7
|
6
|
5
|
No resorption |
5
|
10
|
6
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
3
|
1
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 1 tooth is reduced but not participant |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
7
|
3
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are not evaluated in FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
4
|
4
|
3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups |
---|---|
Description | Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 26 | 26 |
Measure teeth | 35 | 32 | 31 |
Count of Units [teeth] |
4
|
4
|
2
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Restoration Stability |
---|---|
Description | The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 51 | 40 | 39 |
Stainless steel crown |
33
|
28
|
28
|
Composite |
18
|
12
|
11
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Restoration Stability |
---|---|
Description | The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth extracted from HA group so reduced to 50 teeth but no participant reduction |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 34 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 39 |
Stainless steel crown |
32
|
28
|
28
|
Composite |
18
|
12
|
11
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Restoration Stability |
---|---|
Description | The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced from FS group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 50 | 40 | 38 |
Stainless steel crown |
32
|
28
|
27
|
Composite |
18
|
12
|
11
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Restoration Stability |
---|---|
Description | The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth |
Time Frame | Change from Baseline at 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth in HA group |
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. |
Measure Participants | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Measure teeth | 48 | 40 | 38 |
Stainless steel crown |
31
|
28
|
27
|
Composite |
17
|
12
|
11
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Hyaluronic Acid, Formocresol, Ferric Sulfate |
---|---|---|
Comments | Chi-Square Test was used to compare qualitative data.The results were evaluated at the significance level of p<0,05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Overall study;1st month,3rd month,6th month and 12th month after the treatments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | pain or discomfort may be seen after the treatment of the primary tooth tooth can be exfoliated prematurely | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate | |||
Arm/Group Description | Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crown or composite filling material. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/34 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/34 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Hyaluronic Acid | Formocresol | Ferric Sulfate | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/34 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
pulpitis | 0/34 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/34 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Prof. Dr. Ali Mentes |
---|---|
Organization | Marmara University |
Phone | +90 2164140545 |
alimentes@gmail.com |
- MarmaraPD