Study to Assess the Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM) on QT/QTc Intervals in Healthy Adults

Sponsor
Cytokinetics (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04175808
Collaborator
(none)
70
1
2
3.6
19.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of a single therapeutic (50 mg) oral dose of omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) on the QT interval / QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc), relative to placebo, in healthy adults.

The QT interval is the section on an electrocardiogram (ECG) that represents the time it takes for the electrical system to fire an impulse through the ventricles and then recharge, or the time it takes for the heart muscle to contract and then recover.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 1

Detailed Description

The study consists of 2 parts: Part A and Part B. Participants are enrolled in Part A to determine eligibility for Part B.

In Part A participants receive a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil; participants with a resulting maximum observed OM plasma concentration (Cmax) ≤ 350 ng/mL are eligible to enter Part B.

Part B is a 3-period cross-over study in which participants are randomized to receive 3 treatments in 1 of 6 sequences, each separated by a washout of at least 7 days.

This study was conducted by Amgen as the IND holder, with Cytokinetics as a collaborator. Due to the termination of the collaboration agreement between Amgen and Cytokinetics in May 2021 and subsequent transfer of the omecamtiv mecarbil IND from Amgen to Cytokinetics, Cytokinetics is now listed as the sponsor.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
70 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
This was a partially double-blind study. In Part B, placebo and OM treatments were double-blinded, moxifloxacin treatment was open-label, and the core ECG laboratory was blinded to all treatment information. Except for the moxifloxacin treatment in 1 of 3 periods in Part B, treatment assignment was blinded to all participants, site personnel, the Medical Monitor, and Clinical Research Associates.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Single-dose and Randomized, Single-center, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM) on QT/QTc Intervals in Healthy Subjects
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 14, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 4, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 4, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Part A

After an overnight fast of at least 10 hours participants received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil on Day 1.

Drug: Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM)
Oral solution
Other Names:
  • AMG 423
  • Experimental: Part B

    Participants with a maximum observed plasma OM concentration ≤ 350 ng/mL in Part A were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of each the following 3 treatments in one of six treatment sequences: Placebo 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil 400 mg moxifloxacin Each treatment was separated by a washout of at least 7 days.

    Drug: Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM)
    Oral solution
    Other Names:
  • AMG 423
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo oral solution

    Drug: Moxifloxacin
    400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate Based on the Fridericia Method (QTcF) After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose]

      Continuous 12-lead digital ECG recording was performed on day 1 of each period. ECGs were analyzed by a blinded, central reader. At each specified timepoint, ten 14-second 12-lead ECG tracings were extracted from the continuous recordings. The median QT in each replicate was calculated; the mean of available medians was used as the participant's reportable value at that timepoint. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQTcF after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQTcF after placebo. If the upper bound of the confidence interval of ΔΔQTcF was < 10 ms for all post-dose time points, OM was to be concluded to not have a significant effect on QT interval prolongation.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

      Plasma samples at each timepoint were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The lower limit of quantification for plasma samples was 1 ng/mL.

    2. Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil In Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    3. Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    4. Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    5. Apparent Volume of Distribution (VZ/F) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    6. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    7. AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.]

    8. Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate Based on the Fridericia Method (QTcF) After Moxifloxacin Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the moxifloxacin treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Assay sensitivity was validated by analysis of ∆QTcF of moxifloxacin. Continuous 12-lead digital ECG recording was performed on Day 1 of each period. ECGs were analyzed by a blinded, central reader. At each specified timepoint, ten 14-second 12-lead ECG tracings were extracted from the continuous recordings. The median QT in each replicate was calculated; the mean of available medians was used as the participant's reportable value at that timepoint. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQTcF after moxifloxacin dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQTcF after placebo. If ∆∆QTcF was larger than 5 ms at 2, 3, or 4 hours, assay sensitivity was considered to be demonstrated.

    9. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Change from baseline in heart rate (HR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline HR as a covariate.

    10. Change From Baseline in QTcF After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Change from baseline in QTcF was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as a covariate.

    11. Change From Baseline in PR Interval After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      The PR interval is the time from the onset of the P-wave to the start of the next QRS complex. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline PR interval as covariate.

    12. Change From Baseline in QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      The QRS complex is a combination of the Q wave, R wave and S wave on an ECG tracing, and represents ventricular depolarization. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QRS as covariate.

    13. Slope of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Plasma Concentration Estimated From Concentration-QTc Analysis in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      The relationship between omecamtiv mecarbil plasma concentration and ΔQTcF was investigated by linear mixed-effects modeling with ΔQTcF as the dependent variable, time-matched concentration of OM as the explanatory variable (0 for placebo), centered baseline QTcF (i.e., baseline QTcF for individual subject minus the population mean baseline QTcF for all subjects in the same period) as an additional covariate, study treatment (OM = 1 or placebo = 0) and time (i.e., post-dose time point) as fixed effects, and a random intercept and slope per subject. From the model, the slope (i.e., the regression parameter for the concentration) was estimated together with the 2-sided 90% CI.

    14. Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in Heart Rate After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Change from baseline in heart rate (ΔHR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline HR as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔHR (ΔΔHR) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔHR after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔHR after placebo dosing.

    15. Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in PR Interval After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Change from baseline in PR interval (ΔPR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline PR interval as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔPR (ΔΔPR) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔPR after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔPR after placebo dosing.

    16. Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Change from baseline in QRS (ΔQRS) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QRS as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQRS (ΔΔQRS) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQRS after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQRS after placebo dosing.

    17. Number of Participants With Recorded Outlier Values for QTcF, HR, PR, and QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      Outliers were predefined according to the following categories: QTcF: Treatment-emergent value of > 450 and ≤ 480 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Treatment-emergent value of > 480 and ≤ 500 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Treatment-emergent value of > 500 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Increase of QTcF from baseline of > 30 and ≤ 60 ms Increase of QTcF from baseline > 60 ms Increase of PR from baseline > 25% resulting in PR > 200 ms Increase of QRS from baseline > 25% resulting in QRS > 120 ms Decrease of HR from baseline > 25% resulting in HR < 50 bpm Increase of HR from baseline > 25% resulting in HR > 100 bpm

    18. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Changes in T-wave Morphology and U-wave Presence After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B [Day 1 of the OM treatment period at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.]

      T-wave abnormalities were categorized as follows: Flat T-wave: T amplitude < 1 mm (either positive or negative) including flat isoelectric line Notched T-wave (+): Presence of notch(es) of at least 0.05 mV amplitude on ascending or descending arm of the positive T-wave Biphasic: T-wave that contains a second component with an opposite phase that is at least 0.1 mV deep (both positive/negative and negative/positive and polyphasic T-waves included) Normal T-wave (-): T amplitude that is negative, without biphasic T-wave or notches Notched T-wave (-): Presence of notch(es) of at least 0.05 mV amplitude on descending or ascending arm of the negative T-wave U waves: Presence of abnormal U-waves

    19. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [From first dose of study treatment to day 6 of each treatment period]

      A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that started during or after the first dose, or started prior to the first dose and increased in severity after the first dose. A treatment-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE with a relationship of related to the study treatment as determined by the investigator. The Investigator assessed the severity of each AE reported during the study based on the following grading scale: Mild: Aware of sign or symptom, easily tolerated Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity Severe: Incapacitating, inability to work or do usual activity SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: Resulted in Death Was life-threatening Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect Other medically important serious event

    20. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs, Laboratory Tests, or Electrocardiogram Findings [From first dose up to day 6 of each treatment period]

      Blood and urine samples were collected for clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology). Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse rate and body temperature. Standard safety 12-lead ECGs were recorded after the subject had been supine or semi-recumbent and at rest for at least 5 minutes to detect any immediate ECG effects for subject safety. These ECGs were viewed locally. The Investigator determined whether an abnormal value in an individual participant represented a clinically significant change from the participant's baseline values.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 50 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subject has provided informed consent before initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures.

    • Healthy male or healthy female subjects greater than or equal to 18 to less than or equal to 50 years of age.

    • No history or evidence of clinically relevant medical disorders as determined by the Investigator at Screening.

    • Physical examination at Screening and vital signs, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening and Day -1 of each period are clinically acceptable to the Investigator.

    • Body mass index (BMI) greater than, or equal to 18.0 kg/m2 and less than, or equal to 30.0 kg/m2.

    • Willing to maintain current general diet and physical activity regimen.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History or evidence of clinically significant disorder, condition, or disease not otherwise excluded that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion.

    • Any users of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products within 6 months before Day -1 of Part A.

    • History suggestive of esophageal (including esophageal spasm, esophagitis), gastric, or duodenal ulceration or bowel disease (including, but not limited to, peptic ulceration, gastrointestinal bleeding, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or irritable bowel syndrome); or a history of gastrointestinal surgery other than uncomplicated appendectomy.

    • History or current signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease, including but not limited to myocardial infarction, congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, coronary revascularization, or angina.

    • Known substance abuse (eg, alcohol, licit or illicit drugs) within 1 year prior to Screening.

    • Subjects with poor peripheral venous access.

    • Use of any medications/substances outside the allowed timeframes as specified in Section 6.1.2.

    • Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 3 months, or 5 half-lives if longer, prior to receiving the first dose of study drug. Other investigational procedures while participating in this study are excluded.

    • Donated blood from 3 months prior to Screening, plasma from 2 weeks prior to Screening, or platelets from 6 weeks prior to Screening.

    • Subjects who were previously exposed to OM.

    • Hepatic impairment defined by a total bilirubin (TBL) greater than or equal to 1.2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than ULN (and confirmed upon repeat).

    • Systolic blood pressure (BP) greater than 140 mmHg or less than 90 mmHg, or diastolic BP greater than 90 mmHg.

    • QTcF interval greater than 450 msec in male or greater than 470 msec in female or history/evidence of long QT syndrome, or PR of greater than or equal to 200 msec; or 2nd degree atrioventricular (AV) block or 3rd degree AV block, or heart rate greater than 100 bpm (and confirmed upon repeat, except 2nd or 3rd degree AV block, which are exclusionary based on a single finding).

    • Troponin I or creatine kinase MB fraction (CK-MB) greater than ULN at Screening or Check-in for Part A or B.

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 80 mL/min/1.73 m^2 at Screening as calculated by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation;

    • Any positive test for drugs, cotinine (tobacco or nicotine use), and/or alcohol use.

    • Positive hepatitis panel and/or positive human immunodeficiency virus test. Subjects whose results are compatible with prior immunization may be included.

    • Subject has known sensitivity to any of the products or components to be administered during dosing, including history of hypersensitivity to moxifloxacin or any member of the quinolone class of antibacterials.

    • History of tendon rupture or connective tissue disorders.

    • Female subjects with a positive pregnancy test.

    • Female subjects lactating/breastfeeding or who plans to breastfeed during the study through 90 days after the end of study (EOS) visit.

    • Unwilling to adhere to contraceptive requirements through 90 days after the EOS visit.

    • Unwilling to abstain from sperm and ovum donation through 90 days after the EOS visit.

    • Male subjects with a female partner of childbearing potential and not willing to inform his partner of his participation in this clinical study.

    • Male subjects with a pregnant partner or partner planning to become pregnant while the subject is on study through 90 days after the EOS visit.

    • Subject likely to not be available to complete all protocol-required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures (eg, Clinical Outcome Assessments) to the best of the subject and Investigator's knowledge.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Research Site Leeds United Kingdom LS2 9LH

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Cytokinetics

    Investigators

    • Study Director: MD, Amgen

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Cytokinetics
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04175808
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20090231
    • 2018-003157-19
    First Posted:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 4, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Cytokinetics
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Participants were enrolled at a single site in the United Kingdom. The study consisted of 2 parts: Part A and Part B. Part A was a lead-in phase to ensure that omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) plasma concentrations in Part B would not exceed 1000 ng/mL.
    Pre-assignment Detail Participants in Part A received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil; participants with maximum observed OM plasma concentration (Cmax) ≤ 350 ng/mL were eligible to enter Part B. Part B was a 3-period cross-over study in which all participants received a single dose of placebo, omecamtiv mecarbil, and moxifloxacin in 1 of 6 sequences, each separated by a washout of at least 7 days.
    Arm/Group Title Part A Part B: Placebo/OM/Moxifloxacin Part B: OM/Moxifloxacin/Placebo Part B: Moxifloxacin/Placebo/OM Part B: Placebo/Moxifloxacin/OM Part B: Moxifloxacin/OM/Placebo Part B: OM/Placebo/Moxifloxacin
    Arm/Group Description After an overnight fast of at least 10 hours participants received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil on Day 1. Participants received a single dose of placebo oral solution in Period 1, 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 2 and 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Participants received a single dose of 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 1, 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 2, and placebo oral solution in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 1, placebo oral solution in Period 2, and 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Participants received a single dose of placebo oral solution in Period 1, 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 2, and 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 1, 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 2, and placebo oral solution in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Participants received a single dose of 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil oral solution in Period 1, placebo oral solution in Period 2, and 400 mg moxifloxacin oral tablet in Period 3. Each treatment was separated by a washout period of at least 7 days.
    Period Title: Part A
    STARTED 70 0 0 0 0 0 0
    COMPLETED 68 0 0 0 0 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Period Title: Part A
    STARTED 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
    COMPLETED 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Part B
    Arm/Group Description Participants with a maximum observed OM plasma concentration ≤ 350 ng/mL in Part A were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of each the following 3 treatments in one of six treatment sequences: Placebo 50 mg omecamtiv mecarbil 400 mg moxifloxacin Each treatment was separated by a washout of at least 7 days.
    Overall Participants 60
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    32.7
    (8.88)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    26
    43.3%
    Male
    34
    56.7%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    0
    0%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    60
    100%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White
    49
    81.7%
    Black or African American
    6
    10%
    Asian
    4
    6.7%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    Multiple
    1
    1.7%
    QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate Based on the Fridericia Method (QTcF) (ms) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Prior to OM dose
    402.9
    (18.27)
    Prior to moxifloxacin dose
    402.4
    (18.38)
    Prior to placebo dose
    404.1
    (19.06)
    PR Interval (ms) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Prior to OM dose
    151.4
    (22.48)
    Prior to moxifloxacin dose
    150.7
    (22.73)
    Prior to placebo dose
    151.2
    (24.20)
    QRS (ms) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Prior to OM dose
    105.6
    (5.74)
    Prior to moxifloxacin dose
    105.8
    (5.36)
    Prior to placebo dose
    105.8
    (5.52)
    Heart Rate (beats/minute) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Prior to OM dose
    59.2
    (7.87)
    Prior to moxifloxacin dose
    59.5
    (7.36)
    Prior to placebo dose
    58.6
    (8.03)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate Based on the Fridericia Method (QTcF) After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Continuous 12-lead digital ECG recording was performed on day 1 of each period. ECGs were analyzed by a blinded, central reader. At each specified timepoint, ten 14-second 12-lead ECG tracings were extracted from the continuous recordings. The median QT in each replicate was calculated; the mean of available medians was used as the participant's reportable value at that timepoint. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQTcF after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQTcF after placebo. If the upper bound of the confidence interval of ΔΔQTcF was < 10 ms for all post-dose time points, OM was to be concluded to not have a significant effect on QT interval prolongation.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with measurements at baseline as well as on-treatment with at least 1 postdose timepoint with a valid ΔQTcF value in Part B.
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -2.6
    0.5 hours post-dose
    -4.9
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -5.8
    1 hour post-dose
    -6.7
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -4.5
    2 hours post-dose
    -2.7
    3 hours post-dose
    -1.5
    4 hours post-dose
    -0.8
    8 hours post-dose
    -2.2
    12 hours post-dose
    -1.9
    24 hours post-dose
    -1.2
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description Plasma samples at each timepoint were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The lower limit of quantification for plasma samples was 1 ng/mL.
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The pharmacokinetic (PK) population for Part B consisted of all participants who received OM and had evaluable PK data.
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [ng/mL]
    416
    (33.2)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil In Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Median (Full Range) [hours]
    0.583
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [hours]
    20.0
    (2.91)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [L/h]
    10.4
    (21.2)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Apparent Volume of Distribution (VZ/F) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [liters]
    299
    (21.5)
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [h*ng/mL]
    4710
    (21.0)
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Part B
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Part B PK population
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [h*ng/mL]
    4790
    (21.2)
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate Based on the Fridericia Method (QTcF) After Moxifloxacin Dosing in Part B
    Description Assay sensitivity was validated by analysis of ∆QTcF of moxifloxacin. Continuous 12-lead digital ECG recording was performed on Day 1 of each period. ECGs were analyzed by a blinded, central reader. At each specified timepoint, ten 14-second 12-lead ECG tracings were extracted from the continuous recordings. The median QT in each replicate was calculated; the mean of available medians was used as the participant's reportable value at that timepoint. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQTcF after moxifloxacin dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQTcF after placebo. If ∆∆QTcF was larger than 5 ms at 2, 3, or 4 hours, assay sensitivity was considered to be demonstrated.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the moxifloxacin treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    2.2
    0.5 hours post-dose
    8.6
    0.75 hours post-dose
    10.1
    1 hour post-dose
    10.2
    1.5 hours post-dose
    11.1
    2 hours post-dose
    12.7
    3 hours post-dose
    13.1
    4 hours post-dose
    12.9
    8 hours post-dose
    9.7
    12 hours post-dose
    9.0
    24 hours post-dose
    5.3
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Heart Rate After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Change from baseline in heart rate (HR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline HR as a covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    1.3
    0.5 hours post-dose
    1.2
    0.75 hours post-dose
    1.4
    1 hour post-dose
    0.2
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -0.5
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    3 hours post-dose
    1.1
    4 hours post-dose
    1.8
    8 hours post-dose
    7.8
    12 hours post-dose
    8.3
    24 hours post-dose
    2.8
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in QTcF After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Change from baseline in QTcF was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as a covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -6.3
    0.5 hours post-dose
    -9.1
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -8.6
    1 hour post-dose
    -8.1
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -5.5
    2 hours post-dose
    -5.2
    3 hours post-dose
    -4.9
    4 hours post-dose
    -3.3
    8 hours post-dose
    -7.1
    12 hours post-dose
    -6.6
    24 hours post-dose
    -4.1
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in PR Interval After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description The PR interval is the time from the onset of the P-wave to the start of the next QRS complex. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline PR interval as covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.5
    0.5 hours post-dose
    1.0
    0.75 hours post-dose
    0.4
    1 hour post-dose
    0.4
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -1.2
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.8
    3 hours post-dose
    -2.0
    4 hours post-dose
    -3.2
    8 hours post-dose
    -7.5
    12 hours post-dose
    -7.8
    24 hours post-dose
    -2.1
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description The QRS complex is a combination of the Q wave, R wave and S wave on an ECG tracing, and represents ventricular depolarization. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QRS as covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    0.5 hours post-dose
    0.0
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    1 hour post-dose
    0.0
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.3
    3 hours post-dose
    0.00
    4 hours post-dose
    0.1
    8 hours post-dose
    -0.4
    12 hours post-dose
    -0.7
    24 hours post-dose
    -0.3
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Slope of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Plasma Concentration Estimated From Concentration-QTc Analysis in Part B
    Description The relationship between omecamtiv mecarbil plasma concentration and ΔQTcF was investigated by linear mixed-effects modeling with ΔQTcF as the dependent variable, time-matched concentration of OM as the explanatory variable (0 for placebo), centered baseline QTcF (i.e., baseline QTcF for individual subject minus the population mean baseline QTcF for all subjects in the same period) as an additional covariate, study treatment (OM = 1 or placebo = 0) and time (i.e., post-dose time point) as fixed effects, and a random intercept and slope per subject. From the model, the slope (i.e., the regression parameter for the concentration) was estimated together with the 2-sided 90% CI.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The PK/QTc analysis set included all participants who were in both the QT/QTc and PK analysis sets with at least 1 pair of post-dose PK and QTcF data from the same timepoint.
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Number (90% Confidence Interval) [ms per ng/mL]
    -0.011
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in Heart Rate After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Change from baseline in heart rate (ΔHR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline HR as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔHR (ΔΔHR) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔHR after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔHR after placebo dosing.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.9
    0.5 hours post-dose
    -1.3
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -0.6
    1 hour post-dose
    -2.3
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -1.9
    2 hours post-dose
    -1.5
    3 hours post-dose
    -0.9
    4 hours post-dose
    0.5
    8 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    12 hours post-dose
    -1.0
    24 hours post-dose
    -1.7
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in PR Interval After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Change from baseline in PR interval (ΔPR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline PR interval as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔPR (ΔΔPR) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔPR after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔPR after placebo dosing.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    0.6
    0.5 hours post-dose
    0.9
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -0.3
    1 hour post-dose
    1.0
    1.5 hours post-dose
    0.1
    2 hours post-dose
    1.9
    3 hours post-dose
    0.4
    4 hours post-dose
    0.1
    8 hours post-dose
    -1.6
    12 hours post-dose
    -1.0
    24 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Change from baseline in QRS (ΔQRS) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QRS as covariate. Placebo-corrected ΔQRS (ΔΔQRS) was calculated as the adjusted mean ΔQRS after OM dosing minus adjusted mean ΔQRS after placebo dosing.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    0.5 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    1 hour post-dose
    -0.1
    1.5 hours post-dose
    0.0
    2 hours post-dose
    0.1
    3 hours post-dose
    0.1
    4 hours post-dose
    0.1
    8 hours post-dose
    0.3
    12 hours post-dose
    0.4
    24 hours post-dose
    -0.1
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Recorded Outlier Values for QTcF, HR, PR, and QRS After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description Outliers were predefined according to the following categories: QTcF: Treatment-emergent value of > 450 and ≤ 480 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Treatment-emergent value of > 480 and ≤ 500 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Treatment-emergent value of > 500 ms when not present at baseline (new onset) Increase of QTcF from baseline of > 30 and ≤ 60 ms Increase of QTcF from baseline > 60 ms Increase of PR from baseline > 25% resulting in PR > 200 ms Increase of QRS from baseline > 25% resulting in QRS > 120 ms Decrease of HR from baseline > 25% resulting in HR < 50 bpm Increase of HR from baseline > 25% resulting in HR > 100 bpm
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    QTcF > 450 and ≤ 480 ms (new onset)
    1
    1.7%
    QTcF > 480 and ≤ 500 ms (new onset)
    0
    0%
    QTcF > 500 ms (new onset)
    0
    0%
    Increase in ΔQTcF > 30 and ≤ 60 ms
    0
    0%
    Increase in ΔQTcF > 60 ms
    0
    0%
    HR < 50 bpm with a decrease in ΔHR > 25%
    0
    0%
    HR > 100 bpm with an increase in ΔHR > 25%
    0
    0%
    PR > 200 ms with an increase in ΔPR > 25%
    0
    0%
    QRS > 120 ms with an increase in ΔQRS > 25%
    0
    0%
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Changes in T-wave Morphology and U-wave Presence After Omecamtiv Mecarbil Dosing in Part B
    Description T-wave abnormalities were categorized as follows: Flat T-wave: T amplitude < 1 mm (either positive or negative) including flat isoelectric line Notched T-wave (+): Presence of notch(es) of at least 0.05 mV amplitude on ascending or descending arm of the positive T-wave Biphasic: T-wave that contains a second component with an opposite phase that is at least 0.1 mV deep (both positive/negative and negative/positive and polyphasic T-waves included) Normal T-wave (-): T amplitude that is negative, without biphasic T-wave or notches Notched T-wave (-): Presence of notch(es) of at least 0.05 mV amplitude on descending or ascending arm of the negative T-wave U waves: Presence of abnormal U-waves
    Time Frame Day 1 of the OM treatment period at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60
    Flat T-wave
    0
    0%
    Notched T-wave (+)
    0
    0%
    Biphasic T-wave
    0
    0%
    Normal T-wave (-)
    0
    0%
    Notched T-wave (-)
    0
    0%
    U-Wave presence
    0
    0%
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
    Description A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that started during or after the first dose, or started prior to the first dose and increased in severity after the first dose. A treatment-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE with a relationship of related to the study treatment as determined by the investigator. The Investigator assessed the severity of each AE reported during the study based on the following grading scale: Mild: Aware of sign or symptom, easily tolerated Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity Severe: Incapacitating, inability to work or do usual activity SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: Resulted in Death Was life-threatening Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect Other medically important serious event
    Time Frame From first dose of study treatment to day 6 of each treatment period

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (OM, placebo, or moxifloxacin) and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.
    Arm/Group Title Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg
    Arm/Group Description After an overnight fast of at least 10 hours participants received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil on Day 1. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 70 60 60 60
    Any TEAE
    20
    33.3%
    26
    NaN
    24
    NaN
    29
    NaN
    Serious TEAE
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    TEAE leading to discontinuation
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    TEAE leading to death
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Mild TEAE
    19
    31.7%
    25
    NaN
    24
    NaN
    28
    NaN
    Moderate TEAE
    2
    3.3%
    1
    NaN
    1
    NaN
    2
    NaN
    Severe TEAE
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Treatment-related TEAE
    2
    3.3%
    0
    NaN
    4
    NaN
    2
    NaN
    Treatment-related serious TEAE
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Treatment-related TEAE leading to discontinuation
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Treatment-related TEAE leading to death
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Treatment-related mild TEAE
    2
    3.3%
    0
    NaN
    4
    NaN
    2
    NaN
    Treatment-related moderate TEAE
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Treatment-related severe TEAE
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs, Laboratory Tests, or Electrocardiogram Findings
    Description Blood and urine samples were collected for clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology). Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse rate and body temperature. Standard safety 12-lead ECGs were recorded after the subject had been supine or semi-recumbent and at rest for at least 5 minutes to detect any immediate ECG effects for subject safety. These ECGs were viewed locally. The Investigator determined whether an abnormal value in an individual participant represented a clinically significant change from the participant's baseline values.
    Time Frame From first dose up to day 6 of each treatment period

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety population
    Arm/Group Title Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg
    Arm/Group Description After an overnight fast of at least 10 hours participants received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil on Day 1. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 70 60 60 60
    Clinical Laboratory Evaluations
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    Vital Signs
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    12-lead Electrocardiogram
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    22. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in QTcF After Each Treatment In Part 2
    Description Change from baseline in QTcF was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QTcF as a covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Part B: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60 60 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -6.3
    -1.6
    -3.8
    0.5 hours post-dose
    -9.1
    4.4
    -4.2
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -8.6
    7.2
    -2.8
    1 hour post-dose
    -8.1
    8.8
    -1.4
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -5.5
    10.1
    -1.0
    2 hours post-dose
    -5.2
    10.1
    -2.5
    3 hours post-dose
    -4.9
    9.8
    -3.4
    4 hours post-dose
    -3.3
    10.4
    -2.5
    8 hours post-dose
    -7.1
    4.8
    -4.9
    12 hours post-dose
    -6.6
    4.2
    -4.7
    24 hours post-dose
    -4.1
    2.4
    -2.9
    23. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Heart Rate After Each Treatment In Part 2
    Description Change from baseline in heart rate (HR) was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline HR as a covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Part B: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60 60 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    1.3
    2.1
    2.1
    0.5 hours post-dose
    1.2
    4.0
    2.6
    0.75 hours post-dose
    1.4
    5.3
    2.1
    1 hour post-dose
    0.2
    5.4
    2.5
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -0.5
    2.0
    1.4
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    2.0
    1.4
    3 hours post-dose
    1.1
    3.0
    2.0
    4 hours post-dose
    1.8
    2.9
    1.3
    8 hours post-dose
    7.8
    9.1
    8.0
    12 hours post-dose
    8.3
    9.6
    9.3
    24 hours post-dose
    2.8
    3.4
    4.5
    24. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in PR Interval After Each Treatment In Part 2
    Description The PR interval is the time from the onset of the P-wave to the start of the next QRS complex. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline PR interval as covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Part B: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60 60 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.5
    -1.6
    -1.2
    0.5 hours post-dose
    1.0
    -0.6
    0.1
    0.75 hours post-dose
    0.4
    -1.1
    0.7
    1 hour post-dose
    0.4
    -1.5
    -0.6
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -1.2
    -2.1
    -1.3
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.8
    -1.6
    -2.6
    3 hours post-dose
    -2.0
    -3.3
    -2.5
    4 hours post-dose
    -3.2
    -4.5
    -3.3
    8 hours post-dose
    -7.5
    -7.7
    -5.8
    12 hours post-dose
    -7.8
    -7.5
    -6.8
    24 hours post-dose
    -2.1
    -2.6
    -2.1
    25. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in QRS After Each Treatment In Part 2
    Description The QRS complex is a combination of the Q wave, R wave and S wave on an ECG tracing, and represents ventricular depolarization. Change from baseline was calculated based on a linear mixed-effects model with period, sequence, time (categorical), treatment, and time-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects and baseline QRS as covariate.
    Time Frame Baseline (average of samples taken at -1.25, -1, and -0.75 hours predose on day 1 of the OM treatment period) and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The QT/QTc analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Part B: Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment.
    Measure Participants 60 60 60
    0.25 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    -0.2
    -0.2
    0.5 hours post-dose
    0.0
    -0.1
    0.0
    0.75 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    0.0
    -0.1
    1 hour post-dose
    0.0
    0.1
    0.1
    1.5 hours post-dose
    -0.2
    0.0
    -0.2
    2 hours post-dose
    -0.3
    0.1
    -0.3
    3 hours post-dose
    0.00
    0.1
    -0.2
    4 hours post-dose
    0.1
    0.2
    0.0
    8 hours post-dose
    -0.4
    -0.3
    -0.6
    12 hours post-dose
    -0.7
    -0.7
    -1.1
    24 hours post-dose
    -0.3
    0.0
    -0.1

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From first dose of study drug to 6 days post-dose in each treatment period.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Overall
    Arm/Group Description After an overnight fast of at least 10 hours participants received a single oral dose of 25 mg omecamtiv mecarbil on Day 1. Participants received a single oral dose of placebo on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single oral dose of 50 mg OM on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. Participants received a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 of treatment period 1, 2, or 3, depending on sequence assignment. ALL TREATED SUBJECTS
    All Cause Mortality
    Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Overall
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/70 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/70 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Overall
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/70 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/70 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Part A: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg Part B: Placebo Part B: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg Part B: Moxifloxacin 400 mg Overall
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 14/70 (20%) 16/60 (26.7%) 13/60 (21.7%) 18/60 (30%) 39/70 (55.7%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 1/70 (1.4%) 4/60 (6.7%) 1/60 (1.7%) 3/60 (5%) 7/70 (10%)
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis 1/70 (1.4%) 1/60 (1.7%) 2/60 (3.3%) 0/60 (0%) 4/70 (5.7%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Post procedural complication 4/70 (5.7%) 2/60 (3.3%) 3/60 (5%) 1/60 (1.7%) 10/70 (14.3%)
    Post procedural erythema 2/70 (2.9%) 6/60 (10%) 5/60 (8.3%) 5/60 (8.3%) 15/70 (21.4%)
    Procedural pain 0/70 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 1/60 (1.7%) 3/60 (5%) 4/70 (5.7%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Pain in extremity 0/70 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 0/60 (0%) 3/60 (5%) 3/70 (4.3%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/70 (1.4%) 2/60 (3.3%) 0/60 (0%) 2/60 (3.3%) 5/70 (7.1%)
    Headache 1/70 (1.4%) 3/60 (5%) 3/60 (5%) 2/60 (3.3%) 9/70 (12.9%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia 1/70 (1.4%) 2/60 (3.3%) 2/60 (3.3%) 1/60 (1.7%) 6/70 (8.6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Nasal congestion 1/70 (1.4%) 1/60 (1.7%) 0/60 (0%) 2/60 (3.3%) 4/70 (5.7%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 3/70 (4.3%) 0/60 (0%) 3/60 (5%) 1/60 (1.7%) 7/70 (10%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash 1/70 (1.4%) 2/60 (3.3%) 0/60 (0%) 1/60 (1.7%) 4/70 (5.7%)
    Rash papular 2/70 (2.9%) 1/60 (1.7%) 0/60 (0%) 1/60 (1.7%) 4/70 (5.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Study Director
    Organization Amgen Inc.
    Phone 866-572-6436
    Email medinfo@amgen.com
    Responsible Party:
    Cytokinetics
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04175808
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20090231
    • 2018-003157-19
    First Posted:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 4, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2021