INTERPRET-AF I: Qualitative Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Sponsor
Qompium NV (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04374344
Collaborator
(none)
76
1
8.5
8.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Single-lead electrocardiography (ECG) technologies and photoplethysmography (PPG) deriving smartphone apps are gaining interest in the heart rhythm detection space since these apps have the potential to capture and assess heart rhythms. Proprietary arrhythmia detection algorithms are proven to be reliable and accurate. However, insights into the readability of PPG waveforms by human reviewers remain limited. To the investigators' knowledge, there are no publications available regarding the readability of PPG waveforms by human reviewers. The objective of the study was to assess the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG analysis by medical professionals, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis, and investigate whether additional information positively impacts PPG analysis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Qualitative analysis of PPG, single-lead ECG, and 12-lead ECG measurements

Detailed Description

During the study, the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG waveform analysis will be investigated. The objective of the study is to determine the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG measurements, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG, and investigate whether additional information positively impacts the readability of PPG. Medical professionals (cardiologists and cardiology residents), blinded for the patients' characteristics and history, are instructed to separately analyse the following signals, obtained from 30 patients.

  • 30 outputs with PPG waveforms

  • 30 outputs with PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré

  • 30 outputs with PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré, and algorithm interpretation

  • 30 outputs with single-lead ECG waveforms

  • 30 outputs with 12-lead ECG waveforms

Participants report the results of the qualitative analysis via a digital questionnaire with multiple-choice questions. Medical professionals classify each rhythm trace as regular rhythm, one or more ectopic/missed heartbeats, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, unreadable, or other. The tachogram, Poincaré, and the algorithm interpretation are subsequently added to investigate whether the additional information improves the readability of PPG. Based on the provided answers, the study team will determine the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG analysis interpretation, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
76 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Qualitative Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using a Pulse-deriving Smartphone Application
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 10, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 24, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 24, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Medical professionals

Medical professionals including cardiologists and cardiology residents.

Other: Qualitative analysis of PPG, single-lead ECG, and 12-lead ECG measurements
Participants are instructed to qualitatively analyse PPG, single-lead ECG, and 12-lead ECG heart rhythm traces.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between atrial fibrillation and non-atrial fibrillation rhythms [Through study completion, an average of 3 months]

    Readability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG and single-lead ECG signals to detect atrial fibrillation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Required elements to increase the readability of PPG measurements [Through study completion, an average of 3 months]

    Readability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG waveforms, PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré, and PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré and algorithm interpretation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

  2. Diagnostic accuracy of PPG analysis: experienced in PPG analysis vs inexperienced in PPG analysis [Through study completion, an average of 3 months]

    Readability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG waveforms, PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré, and PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré and algorithm interpretation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Cardiologist or cardiology resident

  • Able to understand Dutch or English

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Genk Limburg Belgium 3600

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Qompium NV

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pieter Vandervoort, MD, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Qompium NV
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04374344
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 3
First Posted:
May 5, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Dec 3, 2020
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Qompium NV
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 3, 2020