To a Sustainable Quality Policy

Sponsor
KU Leuven (Other)
Overall Status
Enrolling by invitation
CT.gov ID
NCT04200209
Collaborator
Sint-Trudo Hospital (Other)
400
1
1
33.5
11.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators need stronger feedback loops and a quality monitoring and management system to improve the quality of care in sustainable way. The Chair Sint-Trudo "To a sustainable quality policy" was established to scientifically develop prerequisites for a sustainable quality of care. In this study protocol, a monocentric mixed-method quasi-experimental study will be used to assess the impact of a rapid-cycle quality indicator feedback mechanism on both patients and professionals.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Implementation of a quality indicator feedback mechanism
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
400 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
The Implementation and Impact of a Rapid-cycle Quality Indicator Feedback Mechanism on Patients and Professionals: a Case Study of Sint-Trudo Hospital
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 15, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Hospital

Twelve wards of the hospital will be evaluated at the same time.

Other: Implementation of a quality indicator feedback mechanism
Audit and feedback: A summary of clinical performance and hospital safety culture over a specified period of time. Benchmarking Achievable: benchmarks are calculated from the performance of all members of a peer group and represents a realistic standard of excellence attained by the top performers in that group (i.e. comparing to the top 10% of peers). Educational outreach: A trained independent person or investigator will meet with health professionals or managers in their practice setting to provide information (e.g. feedback of quality indicators). Action planning: The purpose of action planning is to support quality improvement efforts by identifying opportunities for improvement, strategies and steps to accomplish the work.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Hospital mortality [During admission]

    In-hospital mortality rate

  2. Patient experiences [During admission]

    Experiences of patients will be measures by a validated questionnaire (Flemisch Patient Experience Questionnaire). Q: Will you recommend our hospital? (scale min 0 until 10 with 0: not and 10: for sure). For follow questions the scores are 'disagree', 'somewhat agree', 'largely agree', 'totally agree. The higher the score the better the outcome Q: This information was provided by my GP or by healthcare providers in the hospital. Q: I understand the information I received about the cost of my stay. Q: I received sufficient information about the causes of my condition or about the possible treatment methods for my condition or about the consequences of my disease. Q: Nurses or doctors explained things in a way I could understand or treated me with courtesy and respect. Q: My privacy was respected during conversations with caregivers or during examinations, treatment and care. Q: Before any treatment my identity was checked. Q: Hospital staff always introduced themselves

  3. In-hospital length of stay [During admission]

    Length of stay of each patient in the hospital

  4. Adverse events and adverse outcomes [During admission]

    Each adverse event and following adverse outcomes will be measured: urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers, hospital-acquired pneumonia, shock/cardiac arrest, upper-gastrointestinal bleeding, hospital-acquired sepsis, deep venous thrombosis, central nervous system complications, surgical wound infection, pulmonary failure, metabolic derangement, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin resistant Enterococcus, central line associated bloodstream infections, carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae

  5. Failure to rescue rate [During admission]

    The failure to rescue rate for each patient admitted in the hospital will be evaluated

  6. Readmission rate [30 days after discharge]

    Readmission within 30 days of each patient admitted in the hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients admitted in the hospital for more than one night
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients admitted in the hospital for less than one night

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sint-Trudo Ziekenhuis Sint-Truiden Belgium

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • KU Leuven
  • Sint-Trudo Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kris Vanhaecht, MSc, Professor

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Kris Vanhaecht, Professor, KU Leuven
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04200209
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SQP4ST
First Posted:
Dec 16, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 21, 2022