Study Comparing Quantitative Assessments in Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) and/or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate assessments from the Goniometric Lens compared with those from anterior segment imaging in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Patients with OAG and/or OHT Patients with OAG and/or OHT |
Other: No Treatment
No treatment
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens [Day 1]
Intra-rater agreement (for each of the 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
- Inter- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens [Day 1]
Inter-rater agreement (among 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy or sensitivity to diagnostic agents used in study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rochester | New York | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Allergan
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Director, Allergan
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 192024-076
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Patients With OAG and/or OHT |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with OAG and/or OHT. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 102 |
COMPLETED | 100 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Patients With OAG and/or OHT |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with OAG and/or OHT. |
Overall Participants | 102 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
64.1
(12.18)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
53
52%
|
Male |
49
48%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens |
---|---|
Description | Intra-rater agreement (for each of the 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent to Treat: enrolled patients with unobstructed and measurable inferior angles by goniometric reading and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) |
Arm/Group Title | Patients With OAG and/or OHT |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with OAG and/or OHT. |
Measure Participants | 100 |
Number [Kappa statistics] |
0.88
|
Title | Inter- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens |
---|---|
Description | Inter-rater agreement (among 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: <0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect. |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent to Treat: enrolled patients with unobstructed and measurable inferior angles by goniometric reading and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) |
Arm/Group Title | Patients With OAG and/or OHT |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with OAG and/or OHT. |
Measure Participants | 100 |
Number [Kappa statistics] |
0.72
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The Safety Population is used to assess all Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs). The Safety Population includes all enrolled patients who have been examined in the study eye. | |
Arm/Group Title | Patients With OAG and/or OHT | |
Arm/Group Description | Patients with OAG and/or OHT. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Patients With OAG and/or OHT | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Patients With OAG and/or OHT | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/101 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Patients With OAG and/or OHT | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/101 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Therapeutic Area Head, |
---|---|
Organization | Allergan, Inc |
Phone | 714-246-4500 |
clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
- 192024-076