Dual Artery Compression vs. Radial Artery-Only Hemostasis: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion (EASY-RAO)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to demonstrate the superiority in clinical performances of a dual artery compression device (Terry-2 band) compared to a standard radial artery-only hemostasis device (HemoSTOP).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Dual Artery Compression time to hemostasis and incidence of radial artery occlusion will be monitored while using a dual artery compression device (Terry-2-band) to achieve hemostasis. |
Device: Hemostasis
Compression device to achieve hemostasis.
|
Active Comparator: Radial Artery-Only time to hemostasis and incidence of radial artery occlusion will be monitored while using the device currently approved by the institution (Hemo-Stop) and following institutional protocols for hemostasis. |
Device: Hemostasis
Compression device to achieve hemostasis.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Rate of RAO after transradial approach (TRA) at hospital discharge [up to 24 hours]
To determine whether the use of a dual artery compression decreases the rate of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of radial artery patent-hemostasis during hemostasis [throughout intervention, up to 180 minutes]
To determine the conservation of blood flow through the radial artery during compressive hemostasis
- Patient comfort during hemostasis as assessed on a visual scale [throughout intervention, up to 30 days]
To evaluate the level of patient comfort in relation to the device used
- Rates of complications such as repeat bleeding and hematoma (EASY Scale) [throughout intervention, up to 30 days]
To determine the incidence of complications in relation to the device used. Bleeding, spasm and presence of hematomas will be evaluated.
- Nursing involvement in hemostasis management for sensitivity analysis on cost assessment [throughout intervention, up to 24 hours]
To determine the overall nursing involvement (time per nurse per patient) in hemostasis monitoring from end of procedure to patient discharge for a cost-benefit evaluation.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- any patients referred for diagnostic angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patient unable to understand study design or objectives
-
Unable to sign informed consent
-
Patient taking warfarin or other anticoagulant therapy
-
Chronic RAO on both sides precluding TRA
-
Previous ipsilateral transradial approach
-
Inability to comply with the study follow-up
-
Presence of plethysmographic waveform with radial and ulnar occlusive compression
-
Pre-existing local complication (i.e. hematoma, pseudo-aneurysm, ...) precluding access-site evaluation.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IUCPQ - Laval Hospital | Quebec | Canada | G1V 4G5 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Olivier F. Bertrand
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- EASY-RAO
- 2020-3400, 21885