CSALGI2: CryoSpray Ablation(TM)to Determine Safety and Feasibility in Radiation Induced Proctitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, tissue response, and subject side effects of liquid nitrogen sprayed through a catheter (CryoSpray AblationTM, "CSA" or "cryospray therapy") via endoscope in subjects with radiation induced proctitis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
The proposed study is a single center, ten patient pilot study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of sprayed liquid nitrogen through a catheter via endoscope in subjects with radiation proctitis. There will be two groups. Subjects in Group 1 will receive a cryospray applied to healthy tissue for 10 seconds. The cryospray will be repeated four (4) times in sequential fashion for a total of 40 seconds of cryospray therapy. Subjects in Group 2 will receive a cryospray applied to healthy tissue for 20 seconds. The cryospray will be repeated two (2) times in sequential fashion for a total of 40 seconds of cryospray therapy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cryo Spray Ablation Group 1 4 cycles of 10 seconds each |
Device: Cryo Spray Ablation Group 1
Cryo Spray Ablation
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cryo Spray Ablation Group 2 2 cycles of 20 seconds each |
Device: Cryo Spray Ablation Group 2
cryo spray ablation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The primary endpoints for this study are patient safety, treatment efficacy, and feasibility of cryospray therapy in subjects with radiation proctitis. [End of Study]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The secondary endpoints for the study are the cataloging of side effects, and tissue response as determined by endoscopic visual evaluation. [End of Study]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 years of age
-
Have radiation induced proctitis
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant or nursing
-
Planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
-
Planning to sire a child while enrolled in the study
-
Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines.
Subject has prior or concurrent ablation therapy including, but not limited to, photodynamic therapy, multipolar electro coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, laser treatment, radio frequency, etc
-
Refusal or inability to give consent.
-
Concurrent chemotherapy.
-
Medical contraindication or potential problem that would preclude study participation
-
Concurrent participation in other experimental studies
-
Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
-
Portal hypertension due to cirrhosis manifest by esophageal, gastric or rectal varices
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- CSA Medical, Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mary Lee Krinsky, D.O., VA San Diego Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Cash BD, Johnston LR, Johnston MH. Cryospray ablation (CSA) in the palliative treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 16;5:34.
- Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1994 Sep;107(3):747-54.
- Dumot JA. Cryotherapy Ablation for Esophageal HGD or IMCA in High Risk, Non-Surgical Patients. DDW2007 Abstract submission. Cleveland Clinic Foundation (pending publication)
- Eastone JA, Horwhat D, Haluska O, Mathews J, Johnston M. Cryoablation of swine esophageal mucosa: A direct comparison to argon plasma coagulation (APC) and multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC) [Abstract] Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 53: A3448, 2001.
- Eisen GM, Sandler RS, Murray S, Gottfried M. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications with Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):27-31.
- Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Günter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Müller H, Seitz G, Stolte M. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000 Apr;118(4):670-7.
- Greenwald BD. CryoSpray Ablation of Early Esophageal Cancer. DDW 2007 Abstract submission. University of Maryland Medical Center. (pending publication)
- Johnston CM, Schoenfeld LP, Mysore JV, Dubois A. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy: a new technique for mucosal ablation in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):86-92.
- Johnston M, Horwhat J, Dubois A, Schoenfeld P. Endoscopic cryotherapy in the swine esophagus: A follow-up study (Abstract). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 49:AB126, 1999.
- Johnston MH, Cash BD, Dykes CA, Mays HS, Johnston LR. Cryoablation of dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and early stage esophageal cancer [Abstract]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 63 (5): April, 2006.
- Johnston MH, Cash BD, Horwhat JD, Johnston LR, Dykes CA, Mays HS. Cryoablation of Barrett's Esophagus (BE) [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 130 (4, Suppl.2): A640, 2006.
- Johnston MH, Eastone JA, Horwhat JD, Cartledge J, Mathews JS, Foggy JR. Cryoablation of Barrett's esophagus: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Dec;62(6):842-8.
- Johnston MH, Eastone JA, Horwhat JD. Reversal of Barrett's esophagus with cryotherapy [Abstract]. American Journal of Gastroenterology 98(9 Suppl): A30, S11, 2003.
- Johnston MH, Horwhat JD, Haluska, Moses FM. Depth of injury following endoscopic spray cryotherapy: EUS assisted evaluation of mucosal ablation and subsequent healing in the swine model (Abstract). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 51: AB98, 3462, 2000.
- Johnston MH. Cryotherapy and other newer techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003 Jul;13(3):491-504. Review.
- Johnston MH. Endoscopic cryotherapy: A new ice age in gastroenterology? Medscape Gastroenterology 2: 187, 2000.
- Pinsonneault C, Fortier J, Donati F. Tracheal resection and reconstruction. Can J Anaesth. 1999 May;46(5 Pt 1):439-55. Review.
- 17-00016-00