ROCK-RT: Radio-opaque Contrast Agents for Liver Cancer Targeting With KIM During Radiation Therapy: An Observational Feasibility Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This observational study will investigate the properties of image files standardly collected during radiation therapy treatment in a cross-section of liver cancer patients who received stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) after trans-catheter arterial chemo emobilisation (TACE). Specifically, it will determine whether the radio-opaque contrast agents in the image files can be detected by tumour-tracking software (KIM).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
-
Sites will collect image files from the Cancer Radiation Therapy Systems and the medical records of eligible participants. For patient who do not have implanted markers, research personnel (a radiation oncologist, medical physicist or radiation therapist) will manually outline the visible contrast mass. This outline is considered the 'ground truth' of the location of the contrast mass. To ensure its accuracy, the ground truth contrast mass location will be checked by research personnel from another study site.
-
Image and ground truth data collected from 80% of participants will be used by University of Sydney researchers to develop the KIM algorithm to detect and track the radio-opaque contrast agents with sufficient robustness to provide justification for the prospective use of KIM as a real-time image guided radiation therapy tool for liver cancer patients.
-
The developed KIM software will be applied by site Medical Physicist(s) to the treatment imaging data from the remaining 20% of participants the images. Tumour positions produced by KIM will be compared with a 'ground truth' manual delineation.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Contrast mass detection by software [2 weeks]
Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring software detects contrast agent mass on CBCT and intra-treatment images
- Average difference between software and ground truth measure [2 weeks]
Average difference (mm) of location of contrast mass detection on CBCT and treatment images by KIM software compared to the ground truth in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.
- Standard deviation of difference between software and ground truth measure [2 weeks]
Standard deviation difference (mm) of location of contrast mass detection on CBCT and treatment images by KIM software compared to the ground truth in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Modelling of patient or treatment features that contributed to the success or failure of the KIM method [2 weeks]
Using the KIM success rate (primary hypothesis) and patient CT imaging features (contrast agent density, size, shape and location, patient size etc) a generalised linear model, or appropriate alternative, will be used to identity univariate and multivariate patient or treatment features that contributed to the success or failure of the KIM method. Selected features will be identified and developed into a model. If the model predicts the likelihood of KIM success in at least 85% of the patients then the study will be deemed to have achieved the hypothesis.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Received or will receive stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment for liver cancer at a participating site.
-
Received a radio-opaque contrast agent (e.g. Lipiodol™ or DC Bead LUMI™) that is visible on the radiation treatment planning CT scan
-
The radio-opaque contrast agent mass is or will be within the x-ray imaging field of view during the CBCT scan and any planned intra-fraction imaging. Note that there is no requirement of the distance between the contrast agent mass and the treated tumour as the goal of the study is the contrast agent mass tracking.
-
Provides written informed consent (prospectively recruited) or meets criteria for waiving of the requirement for consent (retrospectively recruited)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Less than 18 years of age
-
Minimum image dataset is not available
-
Image dataset is not in a compatible format
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital | Waratah | New South Wales | Australia | 2298 |
2 | Westmead Hospital | Westmead | New South Wales | Australia | 2145 |
3 | Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | Queensland | Australia | 4102 |
4 | Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 |
5 | The Austin Hospital | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Sydney
- Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia
- Western Sydney Local Health District
- Austin Health
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Investigators
- Study Chair: Paul Keall, PhD, University of Sydney
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- IX-2020-DS-ROCKRT