RE-CHALLENGE: Efficacy of Re-challenge With Immune-Checkpoints Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study

Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04069663
Collaborator
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Industry)
144
1
8.7
16.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a multicentre, retrospective, national observational study aiming to describe clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients that performed an ICP re-challenge during their history of disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate the ICP re-challenge efficacy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: No interventional study

Detailed Description

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP), including nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, are currently approved by EMA (European Medicines Agency) and ANSM (National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products) for the treatment of advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in first or second line with different strategies according to the expression of PD-L1. Moreover, durvalumab recently entered the treatment strategy for locally advanced disease in PD-L1 expressing (>1%) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with advanced NSCLC is approximately 3 to 4 months with this kind of drugs and chemotherapy is currently the reference treatment after progression. However, the scientific community is now evaluating the re-challenge strategy. Notably, in patients with metastatic melanoma, different trials have shown the efficacy and the good safety of re-challenge with ipilimumab or a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab after an initial period of disease control with ipilimumab.

To date, no studies have reported the clinical benefit of ICP re-challenge in patients with advanced NSCLC. The effectiveness and tolerance of the re-challenge strategy with the same or another ICP remains therefore a major issue.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
144 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Efficacy of Re-challenge With Immune-checkpoints Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 22, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 15, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 15, 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall Survival [1 year]

    Overall Survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Progression Free Survival [1 year]

    Progression Free Survival

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of NSCLC

  • Advanced disease (stage III-IV) according to the TNM 7th /8th edition classification at the beginning of first ICP

  • Patients must have received at least two lines of ICP during their history of disease

  • Patients with EGFR mutation and/or ALK translocation must have received all specific target agents regularly reimbursed (during the reporting period) prior to the first PCI

Exclusion Criteria:

• Opposition form signed by the living patient or opposition clearly indicated in the deceased patient's medical records

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hosipital, Grenoble La Tronche Isère France 38700

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Grenoble
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

Investigators

  • Study Director: Elisa Gobinni, MD, University Hospital, Grenoble
  • Principal Investigator: Matteo Giaj Levra, pHD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Grenoble
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04069663
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 38RC19.005
First Posted:
Aug 28, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 30, 2020
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 30, 2020