Re-Trabeculectomy Versus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Secondary Surgical Management of Patients With Refractory Glaucoma

Sponsor
Vanak Eye Surgery Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01633775
Collaborator
(none)
100
3
49
33.3
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare three-year outcomes of re-trabeculectomy with those of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in secondary surgical management of patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and a history of previous failed trabeculectomy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Implantation of Ahmed glaucoma tube shunt, and Trabeculectomy with MMC

Detailed Description

Currently, lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only treatment modality to prevent or slow progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Incisional procedures are indicated when medical therapy and/or laser procedures cannot adequately reduce IOP. Trabeculectomy is the most common glaucoma incisional procedure globally. On the other hand, glaucoma drainage devices that have been historically reserved for cases of glaucoma deemed at high risk of failure have increasingly gained popularity particularly in eyes with previous history of glaucoma surgery.

There is still no agreement on the appropriate surgical procedure in those with prior glaucoma surgery. The five-year tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of Baerveldt glaucoma implant versus trabeculectomy, showed that both surgical procedures had similar IOP reduction and use of anti-glaucoma medication; tube shunt surgery had a higher success rate than trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC); the trabeculectomy/MMC had higher incidence of early postoperative complications compared to tube shunt surgery; and rates of late postoperative complications, reoperation for complications, and cataract extraction were comparable in both treatment groups.

In this study, the investigators compared three-year outcomes of re-trabeculectomy with those of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in secondary surgical management of patients with primary open angle glaucoma and a previous history of failed trabeculectomy.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
100 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Re-Trabeculectomy Versus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Secondary Surgical Management of Patients With Refractory Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: a Three-year Comparative Study
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Ahmed glaucoma implant

Procedure: Implantation of Ahmed glaucoma tube shunt, and Trabeculectomy with MMC
In the Ahmed implant group, the tube shunts used were the valved 184-mm2 surface area (Model FP7; New World Medical, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA). In the Trabeculectomy group, a routine trabeculectomy surgery was performed.

Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC)

Procedure: Implantation of Ahmed glaucoma tube shunt, and Trabeculectomy with MMC
In the Ahmed implant group, the tube shunts used were the valved 184-mm2 surface area (Model FP7; New World Medical, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA). In the Trabeculectomy group, a routine trabeculectomy surgery was performed.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in target intraocular pressure (IOP) [day 1, week 1, months 1,3,6,9,12,18,24,30,36]

    All patients had a target IOP that had been assigned for them by the same surgeon prior to their initial failed trabeculectomy/MMC. The routine practice of the surgeon has been to set target IOP based on the Best Practice Treatment Algorithm for POAG. This was based on at least 25% reduction in baseline IOP. Target IOP needs constant reevaluation during the follow-up based on disease progression. In our study, success and failure were considered to be assessed based on change in the target pressure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of anit-glaucoma medications [day 1, week 1, months 1,3,6,9,12,18,24,30,36]

  2. Visual Acuity [day 1, week 1, months 1,3,6,9,12,18,24,30,36]

  3. Mean deviation of visual field exam [Months 6,12,18,24,30,36]

    Only visual field results where consecutive field tests did not show an improvement of 2 dB or more in the mean deviation (MD) over the baseline reading were included as we considered the phenomenon of learning effect in our analysis.

  4. Surgical Success [day 1, week 1, months 1,3,6,9,12,18,24,30,36]

    Surgical failure was defined as persistent IOP of more than target pressure on maximally tolerated medications or IOP less than 6 mm Hg on two consecutive visits, phthisis bulbi, reduction of vision to no light perception, removal of the shunt implant, reoperation for glaucoma, or any devastating intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma defined as (1) IOP not achieving previously assigned target pressure despite prior trabeculectomy and use of maximally tolerated anti-glaucoma medication; and (2) recent progression of the disease based on glaucomatous changes in optic disc appearance and/or worsening of the visual field exam.

  • In the case of two eligible eyes, only the first eye being operated on was enrolled

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Younger than 40 years old

  • Visual acuity of no light perception

  • Lens opacity

  • Elevated IOP associated with silicone oil

  • Prior ocular surgeries other than one trabeculectomy with MMC

  • Previous cyclodestructive treatment

  • Increased risk of endophthalmitis

  • Posterior segment disorders

  • Pre-existing ocular comorbidities (e.g. pterygium,phacodonesis,corneal opacity, or corneal endothelial dystrophies)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Imam Hossein Medical Center Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Negah Eye Hospital Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of
3 Vanak Eye Surgery Center Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Vanak Eye Surgery Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nariman Nassiri, MD, MPH, Vanak Eye Surgery Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
Nariman Nassiri, Prinicpal Investigator, Vanak Eye Surgery Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01633775
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • VESC#2007-056
First Posted:
Jul 4, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Jul 4, 2012
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2012
Keywords provided by Nariman Nassiri, Prinicpal Investigator, Vanak Eye Surgery Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 4, 2012