Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Sponsor
Lahey Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04647643
Collaborator
National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc) (Other), Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization (Other)
8,000
1
13.3
599.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Treatment with paclitaxel-based endovascular devices (PED) has become a common treatment option for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) involving the femoral-popliteal artery. However, an aggregate level meta-analysis identified an association between the use of PED and increased all-cause mortality at both two and five-year follow-up intervals, though there are significant limitations of these analyses. Exploration of real-world data has been suggested as a means to further investigate the safety of PED. The current study explores the association of PED and mortality in real-world data using U.S. commercial claims from the FAIR Health data warehouse.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

Detailed Description

Treatment with paclitaxel-based endovascular devices (PED) has become a common treatment option for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) involving the femoral-popliteal artery. However, an aggregate level meta-analysis identified an association between the use of PED and increased all-cause mortality at both two and five-year follow-up intervals, though there are significant limitations of these analyses. Exploration of real-world data has been suggested as a means to further investigate the safety of PED. The current study explores the association of PED and mortality in real-world data using U.S. commercial claims from the FAIR Health data warehouse.

This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of paclitaxel used as an antiproliferative agent in the treatment of symptomatic PAD in a real-world scenario. We will analyze Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons (DCB) and Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stents (DES), in aggregate and as unique exposures using propensity score-matched survival analysis. (Inverse probability of Treatment Weighting).

Commercial claims of patients who underwent endovascular interventional treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic PAD between 1/1/15 and 12/31/2019 will form the study population. Three separate safety analyses will be performed. 1. Paclitaxel Drug coated balloons (DCB) as compared with propensity-matched patients treated with plain transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). 2. Paclitaxel delivering Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) as compared with propensity-matched cases using bare-metal stents (BMS). 3. Patients treated with either paclitaxel DCB or paclitaxel DES (any PTX) compared with propensity-matched controls (non-PTX,with DCB patients, matched to patients treated with PTA, and DES patients matched to patients treated with BMS).

All proposed analyses will be performed using R 4.01 implemented within the DELTA analytic engine. DELTA is an active surveillance safety system that can monitor clinical data repositories for safety signals and has been validated to support risk-adjusted prospective safety surveillance analyses of complex clinical datasets.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
8000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 20, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon

Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon

Drug: Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
Other Names:
  • Taxol
  • Paclitaxel Drug Coated Stent

    Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated stent

    Drug: Paclitaxel
    Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
    Other Names:
  • Taxol
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Survival [4 years post intervention]

      Freedom from death of any cause

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Survival [2 years post intervention]

      Freedom from death of any cause

    2. Retreatment [2 years post intervention]

      Retreatment with repeat revascularization (open or endovascular)

    3. Amputation [2 years post intervention]

      Freedom from amputation

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Survival for age groups [4 years and 2 years post intervention]

      Freedom from death in the age groups 18-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75 and above

    2. Survival for demographics and special baseline variables [4 years and 2 years post intervention]

      Freedom from death in females, patients with claudication, CKD and dialysis, history of CAD, history of cancer

    3. Survival for special treatment category [4 years and 2 years post intervention]

      Freedom from death in patients with patients receiving paclitaxel-coated device as a second procedure

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All patients, age 18 or older, who had a health insurance claim for outpatient endovascular treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic PAD will be included. The diagnosis and treatment of PAD in the femoral and popliteal arteries will be identified by CPT/HCPCS and ICD-9 and ICD-10 PCS codes.

    • Presence of at least one additional outpatient or inpatient claims, at least 12 months following the index procedure, in order to demonstrate continued enrollment in health insurance coverage.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Age <18 years

    • No qualifying peripheral arterial endovascular procedure

    • Inpatient procedure

    • Patients without any linked claim record more than 12 months after the index procedure, not known to have died or entered hospice care within the first 12 months

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Lahey Clinic, Inc Burlington Massachusetts United States 01805

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Lahey Clinic
    • National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc)
    • Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Sourbha S Dani, MD, MSc, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
    • Study Director: Frederic S Resnic, MD, MSc, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
    • Study Chair: Robbert Zusterzeel, MD, MPH, PhD, NESTcc

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Sourbha Dani, Staff Cardiologist, Lahey Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04647643
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20203069FH
    • 6292-2020-2AS-1001-Phase1
    First Posted:
    Dec 1, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 14, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 14, 2022