Recovery of Upper Limb Paresis at Discharge After Stroke and Its Level of Use in Activities of Daily Living 3 to 6 Months Later (Post AVC-AVQ)

Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03118648
Collaborator
(none)
192
1
35
5.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim is to reduct spontaneous use an activities of daily living of the paretic upper limb after stroke i six months after patient discharge from rehabilitation center. The level of functional recovery at rehabilitation discharge could better guide rehabilitation strategies to enhance independence and participation in daily life.

This study aims to determine, in patients after stroke, the optimal affected upper limb recovery threshold at rehabilitation discharge to predict spontaneous level of use of affected upper limb in activities of daily living, six month later.

This study is a multicentric prognostic prospective cohort study. The main prognostic variable will be the Action Arm Test (ARAT, Lyle, 1981) score at rehabilitation discharge and the predicted variable will be the Motor Activity Log - 28 (Taub et al. 1993) score at 6 months post discharge.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Scale Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

Detailed Description

Adults after stroke will be recruited at post-acute rehabilitation discharge. Three evaluation times will be undertaken: at discharge, three and six months after discharge. Evaluation battery will focus on the three level of the Functioning International Classification: affected upper limb level of strength, proprioception and level of functional recovery, hemineglect, depression, cognition status, and activity level by doing a standardised instrumental task of daily living, and level of participation questionnaire. General characteristics will be taken into account: Age, social status, laterality.

At six months, the spontaneous level of affected upper arm use in daily living will also be assessed using accelerometers.

As the main aim of the study is to build a prediction model, the study size is calculated to observe a minimal number of events by potentially predictive variable. We consider here 7.5 events by independent variable (Vittinghof and McCulloch, 2007) and eight independent variables. According to literature review, we estimated that 35% of adults included in this study would spontaneously use their affected upper arm in activities of daily living six months after discharge. According to these data and considering 10% of protocol deviations, we calculated that 192 subjects will have to be included in the study. The inclusion duration will be 30 months.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
192 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Relations Between the Level Upper Limb Paresis Recovery in Output of the Hospital Unit Continued Care and Rehabilitation and Its Level of Use in Lifestyle at Three and Six Months
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
stroke

Patients over 18 years old leaving the correctional institution with orientation back home First stroke deficit with non-regressive clinical expression in 24 hours Independent in activities of daily living and living at home before stroke. This earlier independence is confirmed by the absence of professional carers in personal care activities Proper oral understanding as measured by score 7 in the Language Screening Test (LAST) (Flamand-Roze et al, 2011) No psychiatric history that led to hospitalization for more than six months Written informed consent after reading the briefing note Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme.

Diagnostic Test: Scale Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Measuring the functional recovery of the paretic upper limb rehabilitation outing with the scale ARAT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Motor Activity [Month 6]

    Score of Motor Activity Log scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Action Arm [Day 0]

    Score of Action Research Arm Test scale

  2. Action Arm [Day 180]

    Score of Action Research Arm Test scale

  3. Cognitive abilities [Day 0]

    Score with kettle test

  4. Cognitive abilities [Day 180]

    Score with kettle test

  5. "Mesure des HAbitudes de VIE" (MHAVIE) [Day 0]

    Score of "Mesure des HAbitudes de VIE" scale (MHAVIE)

  6. "Mesure des HAbitudes de VIE" (MHAVIE) [Day 180]

    Score of "Mesure des HAbitudes de VIE" scale (MHAVIE)

  7. "Montreal Cognitive Assessment" (MoCA) [Day 0]

    Score of "Montreal Cognitive Assessment" (MoCA)

  8. "Montreal Cognitive Assessment" (MoCA) [Day 180]

    Score of "Montreal Cognitive Assessment" (MoCA)

  9. Aphasic Depression Rating (ADRS) [Day 0]

    Score of Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS)

  10. Aphasic Depression Rating (ADRS) [Day 180]

    Score of Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS)

  11. Unilateral spatial neglect (NSU) in the vicinity of extrapersonal space [Day 0]

    Score of "Bell test (test de barrage des cloches)"

  12. Unilateral spatial neglect (NSU) in the vicinity of extrapersonal space [Day 180]

    Score of "Bell test (test de barrage des cloches)"

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients over 18 years old leaving the correctional institution with orientation back home

  • First stroke deficit with non-regressive clinical expression in 24 hours

  • Independent in activities of daily living and living at home and daily activities independence before the stroke. This earlier independence is confirmed by the absence of professional carers in personal care activities (yes / no)

  • Proper oral understanding as measured by score 7 in the language screening test LAST (Flamand-Roze et al, 2011)

  • No psychiatric history that led to hospitalization for more than six months

  • Patient has given its consent within the period provided after reading the briefing note

  • Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Lack of minimum functional motor recovery in paretic upper limb allowing the patient to go put hand to his mouth and to realize do a 45 degrees abduction with the paretic upper limb.

  • Barthel Index score (BI) less than or equal to 40. It is suggested in the literature that a score less than or equal to 40 is a key score of total dependence

  • Persistent severe hemineglect (bells test score > 6).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Bordeaux

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric SORITA, PhD, University Hospital, Bordeaux
  • Study Chair: Paul PEREZ, MD, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique du CHU de Bordeaux

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Bordeaux
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03118648
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CHUBX2015/24
First Posted:
Apr 18, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jun 22, 2017
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Bordeaux
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 22, 2017