Limerick: Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Treatment for Rectal Cancer. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This multicentre randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether an abbreviated MRI is comparable to a combined single venous phase CT with an additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver, in the pretreatment radiological workup in patients with rectal cancer.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The incidence of rectal cancer in the European Union is approximately 125 000 per year, constituting a third of the total colorectal cancer incidence(1). In Sweden approximately 2000 individuals are diagnosed with rectal cancer each year. Evaluation of patients and possible treatment strategies (including neo-adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy, choice of surgical technique and adjuvant chemotherapy) are based on tumor specific characteristics together with patient factors such as general condition and comorbidity. These characteristics include tumor, lymph node and metastasis classification (cTNM), height of tumor (distance from anal verge), engagement of circumferential margin or mesorectal fascia, signs of extramural invasion and the presence of distant metastases. Clinical examination and endoscopy together with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic region are essential in the local staging process, where MRI provides the most accurate radiological assessment, especially for rectal tumors in stage T3 and T4. The recommended methods regarding evaluation of metastases (M stage) include contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) or MRI of the liver/abdomen, CT of the thorax, and in selected cases positron emission tomography (PET)- CT, if extensive extramural vascular invasion is present.
Previous studies have investigated the efficiency of MRI compared to other radiological methods and found that MRI of the liver is superior to contrast enhanced CT, in terms of specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis of liver metastasis (both per patient and per lesion).
Even though MRI has been recommended as the first line modality for evaluating colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients who have not previously undergone therapy the Swedish national guidelines, as well as the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), include recommendations of single venous phased contrast enhanced CT of the liver/abdomen in the pre-treatment radiological workup. Progress within diagnostics has led to development of CT examination with an additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver that may be added to the single venous phase in order to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of liver metastases. However, this has not yet been included in guidelines nor implemented on a national basis in the pre-treatment radiological workup in patients with colorectal cancer.
Objective The primary objective of the present study is to compare percentage of patients requiring further radiological examinations after index examination (due to inconclusive results) between patients randomized to an abbreviated MRI liver protocol and patients randomized to a combined single venous phase CT with an additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver. A secondary aim is to compare time to treatment initiation, survival and development of liver metatstases between patients randomized to either an abbreviated MRI or a combined single-venous phase CT with an additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver.
The study is a multicentre randomized controlled trial where the hypothesis is that there is no clinical difference between the two groups, and the study is designed as a non inferiority trial.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: MRI group An abbreviated MRI of the liver/abdomen |
Radiation: Abbreviated MRI of the liver/abdomen
The MRI examinations of the liver/abdomen will be performed at the same time as the pelvic MRI. A 1,5 T scanner will be used together with a dedicated torso/abdominal coil. An abbreviated MRI liver protocol includes 3 different sequences as follows:
Axial T2-weighted respiratory triggered sequence with 5 mm slice thickness.
Axial diffusion weighted spin echo respiratory triggered sequence with fatsat with b-factors 50/800 s/mm2 and ADC calculation maps, 5 mm slice thickness
An axial breath-hold 3D T1-weighted gradient echo with fatsat with 4 mm slice thickness, gap 2 mm, contrast enhanced venous phase and in a 3 min equilibrium phase, using regular i.v bolus injection of gadolinium contrast medium with standard clinical dose.
|
| Active Comparator: CT group A combined single venous and 3 min equilibrium phase CT of the abdomen/liver |
Radiation: Combined single venous and 3 min equilibrium phase CT of the abdomen/liver
The CT examination of the liver will be performed as a combined examination in a single venous phase starting with the thoracic region directly followed by the abdomen down to the pelvis. An additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver only will end the examination. Regular iodinated low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media will be used of 350 mg I/ml using a power injector, 2-4 ml/s, 100-150 ml dependent on patient weight and kidney function. Reconstructed images in axial, coronal and sagittal plane will be performed.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Need for supplementary radiologic liver examination [3 months]
Number of patients in need for supplementary radiologic liver examination/s before treatment decision, after index examination (CT or MRI) of the abdominal organs, due to inconclusive results.
- Cost effectiveness [12 months]
Costs related to all index radiological examinations will be included. Costs will be collected from national sources such as the Swedish association of local authorities and regions (SKR - Sveriges kommuner och regioner) whenever possible and alternatively from Sahlgrenska university hospital cost-per-patient files. Possibly a more complex model will be relevant depending on outcome, where total health care costs are compared between the two radiological work-up routines. Such an analysis will take survival into account.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to start of treatment [12 months]
Time from index radiological workup to start of treatment
- Recurrence of rectal cancer [12 months]
Number of patients with recurrence of rectal cancer (local or metastatic disease)
- Liver metastasis [36 months]
Number of patients diagnosed with liver metastasis
- Survival [36 months]
Overall survival
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adults >18 years of age
-
Endoscopically or clinically diagnosed with (suspected) rectal cancer and considered for further radiological investigation
-
Are able to understand trial information and provide oral and written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients unable to undergo MRI (causes may include claustrophobia, presence of pacemaker or certain metal components in their body).
-
Patients diagnosed with benign disease of the rectum or squamous cell carcinoma
-
Patients diagnosed with recurrent rectal cancer
-
Patients unable to understand the trial information
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra | Gothenburg | Sweden |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Vastra Gotaland Region
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Park, MD, PhD, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg Sweden
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
- Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 2017
- National Cancer Care Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer [National Cancer Care Guidelines].
Publications
- Achiam MP, Løgager VB, Skjoldbye B, Møller JM, Lorenzen T, Rasmussen VL, Thomsen HS, Mollerup TH, Okholm C, Rosenberg J. Preoperative CT versus diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in patients with rectal cancer; a prospective randomized trial. PeerJ. 2016 Jan 14;4:e1532. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1532. eCollection 2016.
- Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
- Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J. Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):674-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100729. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
- Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, Aranda Aguilar E, Bardelli A, Benson A, Bodoky G, Ciardiello F, D'Hoore A, Diaz-Rubio E, Douillard JY, Ducreux M, Falcone A, Grothey A, Gruenberger T, Haustermans K, Heinemann V, Hoff P, Köhne CH, Labianca R, Laurent-Puig P, Ma B, Maughan T, Muro K, Normanno N, Österlund P, Oyen WJ, Papamichael D, Pentheroudakis G, Pfeiffer P, Price TJ, Punt C, Ricke J, Roth A, Salazar R, Scheithauer W, Schmoll HJ, Tabernero J, Taïeb J, Tejpar S, Wasan H, Yoshino T, Zaanan A, Arnold D. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Limerick