What Benefit With a New Stapler Device in the Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Defecation?

Sponsor
University of Milan (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00810745
Collaborator
(none)
80
2
1
34
40
1.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomized study was designed to compare the 2 year clinical and functional results with the STARR procedure using a new curved cutter stapler or the same operation done with 2 traditional circular staplers.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: starr
Phase 4

Detailed Description

From January to November 2006, 80 women were selected, with clinical examination, constipation score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, and perineography and randomly assigned to 2 groups: 40 patients underwent stapled transanal rectal resection with two staplers PPH-01 (Ethicon Endosurgery Inc, Pomezia, Italy) (STARR group) and 40 had the same operation with new, curved multi-fire stapler Contour R Transtar TM (TRANSTAR group). Patients were followed up with clinical examination, constipation score, and perineography.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
What Benefit With a New Stapler Device in the Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Defecation? Two-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2008

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: rectal resection

Procedure: starr
stapled transanal rectal resection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. incidence of recurrences [2 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. outcomes on symptoms and defecography [2 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
35 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Rectal prolapse

  • Rectocele

  • ODS score > 15

  • Continence score < 3

  • Resting pressure > 40 mm/Hg

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previous anorectal surgery

  • Ods score < 15

  • Continence score > 3

  • Resting pressure < 40

  • Concomitant pelvic floor diseases

  • Psychiatric diseases

  • Absolute contraindications to surgery

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 First department of general surgery university of milan Milan Italy 20122
2 First Department of General Surgery Milan Italy 20122

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Milan

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: paolo boccasanta, md, 1 department of general surgery

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00810745
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • starr
First Posted:
Dec 18, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Feb 26, 2009
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2009
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 26, 2009